Measuring Support for Phylogenies: The “Proportional Support Index”
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] H. Bryant. WHY AUTAPOMORPHIES SHOULD BE REMOVED: A REPLY TO YEATES , 1995, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[2] K. Bremer. Regular ArticleBranch Support and Tree Stability , 1994 .
[3] K. Bremer,et al. BRANCH SUPPORT AND TREE STABILITY , 1994 .
[4] C. Bult,et al. SKEWNESS AND PERMUTATION , 1992, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[5] P. Goloboff. HOMOPLASY AND THE CHOICE AMONG CLADOGRAMS , 1991, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[6] J. Farris. THE RETENTION INDEX AND THE RESCALED CONSISTENCY INDEX , 1989, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[7] J. Carpenter. Choosing Among Multiple Equally Parsimonious Cladograms , 1988, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[8] K. Bremer. THE LIMITS OF AMINO ACID SEQUENCE DATA IN ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENETIC RECONSTRUCTION , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[9] D. Brooks,et al. A Measure of the Information Content of Phylogenetic Trees, and its use as an Optimality Criterion , 1986 .