Sex Differences in the Attractiveness Halo Ef- fect in the Online Dating Environment

The following study with 113 participants analyzes the evaluation bias effects that happen when people are confronted with a typical profile of a online dating service that contains a false photo, i.e. a photo that obviously does not portray the profile owner. It is known that profile photos have a great impact how the profile owner is judged. As predicted by the attractiveness halo effect, an attractive photo leads to better evaluations of the displayed person than an unattractive photo. The results of this study show that even if the evaluator knows that the photo does not actually portray the profile owner, he is nevertheless influenced by the perceived attractiveness of the displayed person. But this is only the case for men judging women. Women seem to be more resistant against this automatic evaluation bias. The findings are fully in line with other empirical findings that support an evolutionary perspective, namely that men ascribe a higher value to physical attractiveness in judging women than women do in judging men.

[1]  Ran R. Hassin,et al.  Facing faces: studies on the cognitive aspects of physiognomy. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  D. Buss,et al.  Strategies of Human Mating , 2006 .

[3]  M. van vugt,et al.  The wandering mind of men: ERP evidence for gender differences in attention bias towards attractive opposite sex faces. , 2011, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[4]  E. Goffman The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[5]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  Looking Smart and Looking Good: Facial Cues to Intelligence and their Origins , 2002 .

[6]  Emir Kamenica,et al.  Gender Differences in Mate Selection: Evidence From a Speed Dating Experiment , 2006 .

[7]  E. Walster,et al.  Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  Martin Gründl,et al.  Beautycheck - Ursachen und Folgen von Attraktivität , 2003 .

[9]  Kari Kumpulainen,et al.  Net-Based Identity and Body Image Among Young IRC-Gallery Users , 2008 .

[10]  D. Buss,et al.  The evolution of human mating. , 2007 .

[11]  M. Zanna,et al.  Physical Appearance, Stigma, and Social Behavior , 2022 .

[12]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. , 1977 .

[13]  M. Bar,et al.  Very first impressions. , 2006, Emotion.

[14]  W. Hager,et al.  Emotionsgehalt Bildhaftigkeit konkretheit und Bedeutungshaltigkeit von 580 Adjektiven: Ein Beitrag zur Normierung und zur Prüfung einiger Zusammenhangshypothesen , 1985 .

[15]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  The truth about lying in online dating profiles , 2007, CHI.

[16]  J. Donovan,et al.  The effects of sex and sexual orientation on attractiveness judgments: An evolutionary interpretation , 1992 .

[17]  G. Kelly The Psychology of Personal Constructs , 2020 .

[18]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  Sensitivity to “Bad Genes” and the Anomalous Face Overgeneralization Effect: Cue Validity, Cue Utilization, and Accuracy in Judging Intelligence and Health , 2004 .

[19]  A. Eagly,et al.  What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. , 1991 .

[20]  P. Vuilleumier,et al.  Faces call for attention: evidence from patients with visual extinction , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  S. Hamann,et al.  Men and women differ in amygdala response to visual sexual stimuli , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  B. Campbell Forces and Strategies in Evolution. (Book Reviews: Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871-1971) , 1972 .

[23]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  Facial Attractiveness: Evolutionary, Cognitive, and Social Perspectives , 2001 .

[24]  Robert M. Kaplan,et al.  Is beauty talent? Sex interaction in the attractiveness halo effect , 1978 .

[25]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  Putting Your Best Face Forward: The Accuracy of Online Dating Photographs , 2009 .

[26]  Nicole B. Ellison,et al.  Managing Impressions Online: Self-Presentation Processes in the Online Dating Environment , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[27]  Sonja Utz,et al.  Types of Deception and Underlying Motivation , 2005 .

[28]  D. Buss,et al.  Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures , 1989, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[29]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  Separating Fact From Fiction: An Examination of Deceptive Self-Presentation in Online Dating Profiles , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[30]  M. Banaji,et al.  Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. , 1995, Psychological review.

[31]  Peter M. Todd,et al.  Different cognitive processes underlie human mate choices and mate preferences , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Alan Feingold,et al.  Sex Differences in the Effects of Similarity and Physical Attractiveness on Opposite-Sex Attraction , 1991 .

[33]  R. Trivers Parental investment and sexual selection , 1972 .

[34]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[35]  Monica T. Whitty,et al.  Revealing the 'real' me, searching for the 'actual' you: Presentations of self on an internet dating site , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[36]  Robert L. Helmreich,et al.  The Strength of the Halo Effect in Physical Attractiveness Research , 1981 .

[37]  Marti A. Hearst,et al.  Assessing attractiveness in online dating profiles , 2008, CHI.

[38]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  Looks and Lies: The Role of Physical Attractiveness in Online Dating Self-Presentation and Deception , 2010, Commun. Res..

[39]  Kirsty Young,et al.  Online social networking, an Australian perspective , 2009 .

[40]  Michael A. Stefanone,et al.  Face off: Implications of visual cues on initiating friendship on Facebook , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[41]  E. Thorndike A constant error in psychological ratings. , 1920 .

[42]  E. Goffman The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[43]  A. Siibak Constructing the Self through the Photo selection - Visual Impression Management on Social Networking Websites , 2009 .

[44]  J. Langlois,et al.  Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.