THE BASIC BIOLOGICAL DATA TRANSMISSION AND CONTROL SYSTEM INFLUENCED BY ELECTRICAL FORCES *

Over the past decade, there has been a growing awareness that electrical and magnetic forces have specific effects on living organisms. These effects are produced by forces of very low magnitude and are not explainable in such simplistic terms a s Joule heating. They appear to indicate sensitivities on the part of living organisms several orders of magnitude greater than predictable by present concepts of cellular or organismal physiology. The effects are apparently separable into two broad categories: those that involve general or specialized functions of the central nervous system (CNS) and those that involve postembryonic growth and healing processes. C N S effects include the production of general anesthesia by electrical currents that traverse the brain,l the production of local or regional anesthesia by currents injected a t classical acupuncture sites,* the direction of migratory behavior of the Atlantic eel by the earth's electrostatic field,3 the navigational aid furnished the homing pigeon by the earth's magnetic field,4 the apparent cue for the timing of biological cycles by the earth's magnetic field,5 and the direct relationship between reversals of the earth's magnetic field and the extinction of whole species in the geological past.6 Growth effects include the stimulation of bone growth by direct current injection,' the stimulation of cartilage regeneration by similar means,8 the restoration of partial limb regeneration to mammals by small direct c ~ r r e n t s , ~ the stimulation of bone growth by electrical fields,1° the inhibition of growth of implanted tumors in mammals by electrical currents with a polarity dependence" and by exposure to nonuniform magnetic fields,12 the effect upon cephalocaudal axis development in the regenerating flatworm in a polarity-dependent fashion by applied direct and the production of morphological alterations in embryonic development by manipulation of the electrochemical species present in the environment." The lists are not intended to be all inclusive but were chosen to illustrate the great variety of effects produced. It should be noted that several of the effects a re clinically applicable, and, indeed, some are in clinical use today. Unfortunately, none of the effects (except possibly bone growth stimulation) are based on an adequate foundation of biological theory, and, in fact, the key proposition of these effects, namely, that cells are capable of sensing and responding, in a specific fashion, to levels of electrical current/voltage or electrical or magnetic fields, is hardly universally accepted. I should like to consider, not the question of what effects occur or how they occur, but rather why they occur a t all. Present physiological theories deal with

[1]  F. Northrop,et al.  The Electro-Dynamic Theory of Life , 1935, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[2]  I. Tasaki,et al.  Electric Response of Glia Cells in Cat Brain , 1958, Science.

[3]  B. Libet,et al.  The control of normal and "convulsive" brain potentials. , 1940 .

[4]  R. Becker,et al.  Photoelectric Effects in Human Bone , 1965, Nature.

[5]  R. Becker Search for Evidence of Axial Current Flow in Peripheral Nerves of Salamander , 1961, Science.

[6]  D. D.-B.,et al.  Degeneration and Regeneration of the Nervous System , 1930, Nature.

[7]  Robert O. Becker Some Observations Indicating the Possibility of Longitudinal Charge-Carrier Flow in the Peripheral Nerves , 1962 .

[8]  R. Becker The bioelectric factors in amphibian-limb regeneration. , 1961, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  P. Gyorgy,et al.  Introduction to a Submolecular Biology , 1961, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[10]  M. G. Anan'ev,et al.  PRELIMINARY DATA ON EXPERIMENTAL ELECTRONARCOSIS INDUCED WITH APPARATUS OF THE SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL SURGICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS , 1960, Anesthesiology.

[11]  R. Becker,et al.  Electrical stimulation of partial limb regeneration in mammals. , 1972, Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine.

[12]  M. Singer,et al.  The Influence of the Nerve in Regeneration of the Amphibian Extremity , 1952, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[13]  S. Goldring,et al.  D-C POTENTIALS OF THE BRAIN. , 1964, Physiological reviews.

[14]  C. E. Humphrey,et al.  Biophysical Approach toward Tumor Regression in Mice , 1959, Science.

[15]  H. W. Beams,et al.  Electrical control of morphogenesis in regenerating Dugesia tigrina. I. Relation of axial polarity to field strength. , 1952, Journal of cellular and comparative physiology.

[16]  R. Becker,et al.  Longitudinal Direct-Current Gradients of Spinal Nerves , 1962, Nature.

[17]  G. Cochran Experimental methods for stimulation of bone healing by means of electrical energy. , 1972, Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine.

[18]  D. D. Eley,et al.  The semiconductivity of organic substances. Part 2 , 1955 .

[19]  L. G. Barth,et al.  22 Sodium and 45 calcium uptake during embryonic induction in Rana pipiens. , 1972, Developmental biology.

[20]  M. Singer The acetylcholine content of the normal forelimb regenerate of the adult newt, Triturus , 1959 .

[21]  R. Becker,et al.  The Electrical Control System Regulating Fracture Healing in Amphibians , 1970, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  F. Cope Evidence for semiconduction in Aplysia nerve membrane. , 1968, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  N. Opdyke,et al.  Antarctic Radiolaria, Magnetic Reversals, and Climatic Change , 1967, Science.

[24]  W. Keeton,et al.  Magnets interfere with pigeon homing. , 1971, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  F. Brown, The "clocks" timing biological rhythms. , 1972, American scientist.

[26]  S. Rommel,et al.  Oceanic Electric Fields: Perception by American Eels? , 1972, Science.

[27]  Brown Fa The "clocks" timing biological rhythms. , 1972 .