The Role of Façade Materials in Blast-Resistant Buildings: An Evaluation Based on Fuzzy Delphi and Fuzzy EDAS

Blast-resistant buildings are mainly used to protect main instruments, controllers, expensive equipment, and people from explosion waves. Oil and gas industry projects almost always include blast-resistant buildings. For instance, based on a hazard identification (HAZID) and hazard and operability (HAZOP) analysis of a plant, control rooms and substations are sometimes designed to withstand an external free air explosion that generates blast over pressure. In this regard, a building facade is considered to be the first barrier of resistance against explosion waves, and therefore a building facade has an important role in reducing a building’s vulnerability and human casualties. In case of a lack of enough resistance, explosion waves enter a building and bring about irreparable damage to the building. Consequently, it seems important to study and evaluate various materials used in a facade against the consequences of an explosion. This study tried to make a comparison between different types of building facades against explosion waves. The materials used in a building play a key role in the vulnerability of a building. In this research, a literature review and the fuzzy Delphi method were applied to find the most critical criteria, and then a fuzzy evaluation based on the distance from the average solution (EDAS) was applied in order to assess various materials used in building facades from the perspective of resiliency. A questionnaire was presented to measure effective indices in order to receive experts’ ideas. Finally, by implementing this methodology in a case study, it was concluded that a stone facade performs much better against explosions.

[1]  Mahdi Bitarafan,et al.  Role of architectural space in blast-resistant buildings , 2013 .

[2]  İbrahim Zeki Akyurt,et al.  Hydrogen mobility roll-up site selection using intuitionistic fuzzy sets based WASPAS, COPRAS and EDAS , 2019, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[3]  Morteza Yazdani,et al.  Intuitionistic fuzzy edas method: an application to solid waste disposal site selection , 2017 .

[4]  Mahdi Bitarafan,et al.  The architectural evaluation of buildings’ indices in explosion crisis management , 2016 .

[5]  Norbert Gebbeken,et al.  Explosion Protection—Architectural Design, Urban Planning and Landscape Planning , 2010 .

[6]  Jurgita Antucheviciene,et al.  A Dynamic Fuzzy Approach Based on the EDAS Method for Multi-Criteria Subcontractor Evaluation , 2018, Inf..

[7]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification Using a New Method of Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) , 2015, Informatica.

[8]  Mahdi Bitarafan,et al.  Evaluation of Types of Shapes of Building Roof against Explosion , 2013 .

[9]  Mahdi Bitarafan,et al.  Selecting the optimal composition of architectural forms from the perspective of civil defense using AHP and IHWP methods , 2015 .

[10]  Ping-Teng Chang,et al.  The fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy statistics and membership function fitting and an application to the human resources , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[11]  Jurgita Antucheviciene,et al.  A new multi-criteria model based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets and EDAS method for supplier evaluation and order allocation with environmental considerations , 2017, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[12]  M. Barakat and J.G. Hetherington New Architectural Forms To Reduce The EffectsOf Blast Waves And Fragments On Structures , 1970 .

[13]  Norman Jones,et al.  Structures Under Shock and Impact XV , 2018 .

[14]  Jurgita Antucheviciene,et al.  A new hybrid fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluation of construction equipment with sustainability considerations , 2018 .

[15]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Extended EDAS Method for Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision-making: An Application to Supplier Selection , 2016, Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control.

[16]  Mahdi Bitarafan,et al.  Choosing the best urban tunnels as safe space in crisis using AHP method: a case study in Iran , 2015 .

[17]  Ilija Tanackov,et al.  EVALUATION OF SUPPLIERS UNDER UNCERTAINTY: A MULTIPHASE APPROACH BASED ON FUZZY AHP AND FUZZY EDAS , 2019, Transport.

[18]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Evaluation types of exterior walls to reconstruct Iran earthquake areas (Ahar Heris Varzeqan) by using AHP and fuzzy methods , 2016 .

[19]  Bibiana Luccioni,et al.  Analysis of building collapse under blast loads , 2004 .

[20]  Mahdi Bitarafan,et al.  Model for rapid assessment of vulnerability of office buildings to blast using SWARA and SMART methods (a case study of swiss re tower) , 2016 .