Reducing costs of emerging renewable energy technologies – an analysis of the dynamic development with wind power as case study

Renewable energy is considered important to improve environmental performance and the long-term security of energy supply. As most renewable energy technologies are not competitive in conventional power markets, they need public support in order to become so. The purpose of this paper is to discuss and understand the dynamic structure in development of renewable energy technologies in connection to public subsidy schemes. The complex causal relationships behind reduction of unit costs are described through causal-loop diagrams in order to explain some interactions between different support mechanisms. These along with classification of development phases are used to set up a framework to understand the trace of the dynamic process and determine optimal research strategy. A case study of Danish wind turbines will be discussed, and checked with the theoretic framework in order to discuss an optimal research policy. The outcome of the paper is suggestions of research strategies in renewable energy technologies based on lifetime and present characteristics of the respective technology.

[1]  E. Mansfield.  The economics of technological change , 1968 .

[2]  Lena Neij,et al.  Use of experience curves to analyse the prospects for diffusion and adoption of renewable energy technology , 1997 .

[3]  T. P. Wright,et al.  Factors affecting the cost of airplanes , 1936 .

[4]  K. Arrow.  The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing , 1962 .

[5]  L. Leydesdorff.  The triple helix: an evolutionary model of innovations , 2000 .

[6]  Stine Grenaa Jensen.  Quantitative analysis of technological development within renewable energy technologies , 2004 .

[7]  Paul B. Kantor,et al.  The learning curve: a new perspective , 2000 .

[8]  Clas-Otto Wene,et al.  ASSESSING NEW ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES USING AN ENERGY SYSTEM MODEL WITH ENDOGENIZED EXPERIENCE CURVES , 1997 .

[9]  Vicki Norberg-Bohm,et al.  Technology policy and renewable energy: public roles in the development of new energy technologies , 1999 .

[10]  C. Wene.  Experience Curves for Energy Technology Policy , 2000 .

[11]  Antonio Soria,et al.  Technical change dynamics: evidence from the emerging renewable energy technologies , 2001 .

[12]  Leo Schrattenholzer,et al.  Learning rates for energy technologies , 2001 .

[13]  Chihiro Watanabe,et al.  Industrial dynamism and the creation of a “virtuous cycle” between R&D, market growth and price reduction: The case of photovoltaic power generation (PV) development in Japan , 2000 .

[14]  Ulrika Claeson Colpier.  Analyzing technological change using experience curves - a study of the combined cycle gas turbine , 2000 .

[15]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[16]  Martin Junginger,et al.  Experience curves in the wind energy sector use : analysis and recommendations , 2000 .

[17]  C. Antonelli.  microdynamics of technological change , 1994 .

[18]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Perspectives on Technology. , 1978 .

[19]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[20]  W. Zangwill,et al.  Toward a Theory of Continuous Improvement and the Learning Curve , 1998 .