ACTION OF X-RAYS ON MAMMALIAN CELLS

Survival curves of normal human cells from a variety of tissues exposed to varying doses of x-irradiation have been constructed, which permit definition of the intrinsic radiation sensitivity of the reproductive power of each cell type. The mean lethal dose of x-irradiation for all the cells employed, including those from normal and cancerous organs, those exhibiting diploid and polyploid chromosome number; those from embryonic and adult tissues, including recently isolated cells and cultures which had been maintained in vitro for many years, and cells exhibiting either epithelioid or fibroblastic morphology, was found to be contained between the limits of 50 to 150 r. Other similarities in the pattern of radiation effects, such as giant formation and abortive colonial growth, in these cells and that of the HeLa S3, previously studied, confirm the hypothesis that the pattern of reaction to x-irradiation previously elucidated, is representatative, at least in over-all outline, for a large variety of human cells. While the radiation survival curves of various human cells are similar in the gross, small but important characterizing differences have been found. All epithelioid cells so far studied are approximately 2-hit, and more radioresistant than the fibroblast-like cells whose survival data correspond to a mean lethal dose of around 60 r, and which so far can be fitted by either 1-hit or 2-hit curves. The earlier prediction that the major radiobiologic damage to mammalian cells is lodged in the genetic apparatus was confirmed by the demonstration of high frequency of mutants among the survivors of doses of 500 to 900 r. All the data on the x-radiosensitivity of these cells can be explained on the basis of a defect resulting from primary damage localized in one or more chromosomes. These considerations afford a convincing explanation of several aspects of the mammalian radiation syndrome.

[1]  J. Graham,et al.  Cytological prognosis in cancer of the uterine cervix treated radiologically , 1955, Cancer.

[2]  T. Hsu,et al.  Mammalian chromosomes in vitro. VII. Heteroploidy in human cell strains. , 1957, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[3]  A. N. Stroud,et al.  Radiation effects in tissue culture. , 1954, Texas reports on biology and medicine.

[4]  T. Puck,et al.  CLONAL GROWTH IN VITRO OF EPITHELIAL CELLS FROM NORMAL HUMAN TISSUES , 1956, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[5]  R. E. Zirkle,et al.  Irradiation of parts of individual cells. III. Effects of chromosomal and extrachromosomal irradiation on chromosome movements. , 1955, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[6]  H. M. Patt,et al.  Influence of temperature on the response of frogs to X irradiation. , 1948, The American journal of physiology.

[7]  T. Puck,et al.  CLONAL GROWTH IN VITRO OF HUMAN CELLS WITH FIBROBLASTIC MORPHOLOGY , 1957, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[8]  H. Newcombe,et al.  Factors Responsible for the Delayed Appearance of Radiation-Induced Mutants in Escherichia Coli. , 1949, Genetics.

[9]  T. Puck,et al.  A RAPID METHOD FOR VIABLE CELL TITRATION AND CLONE PRODUCTION WITH HELA CELLS IN TISSUE CULTURE: THE USE OF X-IRRADIATED CELLS TO SUPPLY CONDITIONING FACTORS. , 1955, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  R. Paterson The treatment of malignant disease by radium and X-Rays : being a practice of radiotherapy , 1948 .

[11]  T. R. Reid,et al.  A quantitative study of the effects of x radiation on cells in vitro. , 1952, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[12]  J. Snyder,et al.  Continuous Subcultivation of Epithelial-like Cells from Normal Human Tissues.∗ , 1954, Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine.

[13]  T. Puck,et al.  CLONAL GROWTH OF MAMMALIAN CELLS IN VITRO , 1956, The Journal of experimental medicine.