Assessing the Performance of Local Government

We consider the measurement of performance in the public sector in general, focussing on local government and the provision of library services by English local authorities in particular. We will consider two methodologies that assess the performance of local authorities in terms of the efficiency with which they provide services and consider methods that allow us to account for exogenous influences on performance, such as the socio-economic profile of the population served by the authority. We find that although both methods' results appear similar, the implications for potential cost savings vary widely. Omitting to account for background factors leads to an overstatement of the level of inefficiency and hence the scope for reducing expenditure.

[1]  Lennart Hjalmarsson,et al.  Deterministic parametric and nonparametric estimation of efficiency in service production: A comparison , 1990 .

[2]  A. U.S.,et al.  FORMULATION AND ESTIMATION OF STOCHASTIC FRONTIER PRODUCTION FUNCTION MODELS , 2001 .

[3]  J. Cubbin,et al.  Public Sector Efficiency Measurement: Applications of Data Envelopment Analysis , 1992 .

[4]  A. Worthington.  Performance Indicators and Efficiency Measurement in Public Libraries , 1999 .

[5]  G. Smith,et al.  Measuring Multiple Deprivation at the Small-Area Level , 2006 .

[6]  Peter Schmidt,et al.  One-Step and Two-Step Estimation of the Effects of Exogenous Variables on Technical Efficiency Levels , 2002 .

[7]  K. Kerstens,et al.  Cost efficiency of Belgian local governments: A comparative analysis of FDH, DEA, and econometric approaches , 1996 .

[8]  T. R. Nunamaker,et al.  Using data envelopment analysis to measure the efficiency of non‐profit organizations: A critical evaluation , 1985 .

[9]  Philip Stevens.  Accounting for Background Variables in Stochastic Frontier Analysis , 2004 .

[10]  Peter Smith,et al.  Model misspecification in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1997, Ann. Oper. Res..

[11]  Timothy Coelli,et al.  An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis , 1997 .

[12]  T. Sexton,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: Critique and Extensions , 1986 .

[13]  G. Battese,et al.  A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data , 1995 .

[14]  T. Coelli,et al.  Accounting for Environmental Influences in Stochastic Frontier Models: With Application to International Airlines , 1999 .

[15]  R. Wilkinson,et al.  Economics and Consumer Behaviour , 1981 .

[16]  Donald F. Vitaliano,et al.  Assessing Public Library Efficiency Using Data Envelopment Analysis , 1998 .

[17]  D. Reifschneider,et al.  SYSTEMATIC DEPARTURES FROM THE FRONTIER: A FRAMEWORK FOR THE ANALYSIS OF FIRM INEFFICIENCY* , 1991 .

[18]  J. Chilingerian.  Evaluating physician efficiency in hospitals : a multivariate analysis of best practices , 1995 .

[19]  D. Vitaliano.  X-Inefficiency in the Public Sector: the Case of Libraries , 1997 .

[20]  A. Worthington,et al.  Efficiency Measurement in the Local Public Sector: Econometric and Mathematical Programming Frontier Techniques , 2000 .

[21]  Ramu Ramanathan,et al.  An Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis , 2003 .

[22]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Efficiency Analysis for Exogenously Fixed Inputs and Outputs , 1986, Oper. Res..

[23]  Peter Smith,et al.  Data envelopment analysis applied to quality in primary health care , 1996, Ann. Oper. Res..

[24]  E. Wailand Bessent,et al.  Determining the Comparative Efficiency of Schools through Data Envelopment Analysis , 1980 .

[25]  Mervyn Stone,et al.  How not to measure the efficiency of public services (and how one might) , 2002 .

[26]  CL Huang,et al.  Estimation of a non-neutral stochastic frontier production function , 1994 .

[27]  S. Kumbhakar,et al.  A Generalized Production Frontier Approach for Estimating Determinants of Inefficiency in U.S. Dairy Farms , 1991 .