Journal Article Retrieval in an Age of Open Access: How Journal Indexes Indicate Open Access Articles

As the number of Open Access (OA) journal articles increases dramatically, it is time to assess how journal article indexes, both free and subscription-based, retrieve and indicate OA full text. This study uses 471 samples of OA articles to compare OA article retrieval in Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scopus, with Scopus representing subscription-based journal indexes. This study divides journal articles into two categories: Gold OA and Green OA. Gold OA articles are published in journals that make all their articles freely available on the Internet, and all other OA articles are placed in the Green OA category. The study finds that all three indexes can indicate Gold OA availability in one way or another, but they differ dramatically when indicating Green OA availability: Google Scholar can offer free full-text indicators for 96 percent of Green OA articles, PubMed's rate is 29 percent, and Scopus's is zero. Subscription-based journal indexes and OpenURL link resolvers are, at present, incapable of indicating Green OA full-text availability. Vendors of subscription-based indexes and OpenURL link resolvers must overcome this challenge in order to stay relevant in the age of OA. In the meantime, librarians may want to take advantage of Google Scholar and PubMed to better serve library patrons.

[1]  Heather Morrison The Dramatic Growth of Open Access , 2006 .

[2]  Peter Suber Open Access in 2008 , 2009 .

[3]  Lisa A. Ennis The access principle: The case for open access to research and scholarship , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[4]  Péter Jacsó,et al.  Google Scholar revisited , 2008, Online Inf. Rev..

[5]  Szabolcs Dancs,et al.  Registry of Open Access Repositories , 2006 .

[6]  Jean-Claude Guedon,et al.  The “Green” and “Gold” Roads to Open Access: The Case for Mixing and Matching , 2004 .

[7]  Christy Caldwell,et al.  Shifting Sands: Science Researchers on Google Scholar, Web of Science, and PubMed, with Implications for Library Collections Budgets. , 2010 .

[8]  R. Steinbrook,et al.  Public access to NIH-funded research. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  S. Schroter,et al.  Perceptions of open access publishing: interviews with journal authors , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  B. Björk,et al.  Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009 , 2010, PloS one.

[11]  S. Harnad,et al.  Comparing the Impact of Open Access (OA) vs. Non-OA Articles in the Same Journals , 2004 .

[12]  Stevan Harnad,et al.  Waking OA's “Slumbering Giant”: The University's Mandate To Mandate Open Access , 2008 .

[13]  David W. Lewis,et al.  The Inevitability of Open Access , 2012, Coll. Res. Libr..

[14]  B. Björk,et al.  The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 , 2011, PloS one.

[15]  K. Antelman Do Open-Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact? , 2004 .

[16]  Stéfan Jacques Darmoni,et al.  Is the coverage of google scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews , 2013, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[17]  Xiaotian Chen Google Scholar's Dramatic Coverage Improvement Five Years after Debut 1 1 The author is grateful to Alice Chen of Duke University for editing this paper. , 2010 .

[18]  Tschera Harkness Connell,et al.  The Impact of Institutional Repositories on Technical Services , 2010 .

[19]  Branka Maravić,et al.  DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals , 2005 .