Elastic image registration for guiding focal laser ablation of prostate cancer: Preliminary results

PURPOSE To guide ultrasound-driven prostate photodynamic therapy using information from MRI-based treatment planning. METHODS Robust points matching (RPM) and thin plate splines (TPS) are used to solve correspondences and to map optimally positioned landmarks from MR images to transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) images. The algorithm uses a reduced number of anatomical markers that are initialized on the images. RESULTS Both phantom and patient data were used to evaluate precision and robustness of the method. Mean registration error (±standard deviation) was of 2.18±0.25 mm and 1.55±0.31 mm for patient prostate and urethra, respectively. Repeated tests with different markers initialization conditions showed that the quality of registration was neither influenced by the number of markers nor to the human observer. CONCLUSION This method allows for satisfyingly accurate and robust non rigid registration of MRI and TRUS and provides practitioners with substantial help in mapping treatment planning from pre-operative MRI to interventional TRUS.

[1]  Jocelyne Troccaz,et al.  Mapping of Transrectal Ultrasonographic Prostate Biopsies , 2009, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[2]  I. Kaplan,et al.  Real time MRI-ultrasound image guided stereotactic prostate biopsy. , 2002, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[3]  Sheng Xu,et al.  Closed-Loop Control in Fused MR-TRUS Image-Guided Prostate Biopsy , 2007, MICCAI.

[4]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Principal Warps: Thin-Plate Splines and the Decomposition of Deformations , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  Oliver Sartor,et al.  Focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: a critical appraisal of rationale and modalities. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[6]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  MRI-ultrasound registration for targeted prostate biopsy , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[7]  B. G. Blijenberg,et al.  Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  Matching 3-D anatomical surfaces with non-rigid deformations using octree-splines , 1993, Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Biomedical Image Analysis.

[9]  Anand Rangarajan,et al.  A new point matching algorithm for non-rigid registration , 2003, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[10]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[11]  Jocelyne Troccaz,et al.  MRI/TRUS data fusion for prostate brachytherapy. Preliminary results , 2004, Medical physics.

[12]  Jean Duchon,et al.  Splines minimizing rotation-invariant semi-norms in Sobolev spaces , 1976, Constructive Theory of Functions of Several Variables.

[13]  Anand Rangarajan,et al.  A new algorithm for non-rigid point matching , 2000, Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2000 (Cat. No.PR00662).

[14]  Anand Rangarajan,et al.  The Softassign Procrustes Matching Algorithm , 1997, IPMI.

[15]  Robert A Weersink,et al.  Treatment planning and dose analysis for interstitial photodynamic therapy of prostate cancer , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Sheng Xu,et al.  Fusion of real-time transrectal ultrasound with pre-acquired MRI for multi-modality prostate imaging , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[17]  Nacim Betrouni,et al.  A model to estimate the outcome of prostate cancer photodynamic therapy with TOOKAD Soluble WST11 , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  Zeike A. Taylor,et al.  MR to ultrasound registration for image-guided prostate interventions , 2012, Medical Image Anal..

[19]  Maximilien Vermandel,et al.  Ultrasound image guided patient setup for prostate cancer conformal radiotherapy , 2007, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[20]  Eric Mjolsness,et al.  New Algorithms for 2D and 3D Point Matching: Pose Estimation and Correspondence , 1998, NIPS.