The moderating effects of task complexity on the relationship between regulatory foci and safety and production performance.

Regulatory foci of promotion and prevention have been shown to relate differentially to occupational safety and production. This research proposes that task complexity can help explain the differences reported between these 2 self-regulatory processes and safety and productivity performance. Results revealed that promotion is positively related to production and prevention is positively related to safety regardless of task complexity. However, when task complexity is high, promotion negatively relates to safety and prevention negatively relates production. Implications for work motivation theory and research, as well as avenues for future research, are discussed. Practical implications for managerial interventions to optimize both safety and productivity are also presented.

[1]  E. Higgins,et al.  Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance: distinct self-regulatory systems. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  Maddy Janssens,et al.  Confirmatory Cross-Cultural Research: Testing the Viability of a Corporation-Wide Safety Policy , 1995 .

[3]  M E Paté-Cornell,et al.  Organizational aspects of engineering system safety: the case of offshore platforms. , 1990, Science.

[4]  J. Brockner,et al.  Value from hedonic experience and engagement. , 2006, Psychological review.

[5]  Eleanor M. Smith,et al.  Relationships of goal orientation, metacognitive activity, and practice strategies with learning outcomes and transfer , 1998 .

[6]  M Kaminski,et al.  Unintended consequences: organizational practices and their impact on workplace safety and productivity. , 2001, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[7]  David A. Hofmann,et al.  Health and safety in organizations : a multilevel perspective , 2003 .

[8]  Tahira M Probst,et al.  Layoffs and tradeoffs: production, quality, and safety demands under the threat of job loss. , 2002, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[9]  Joel Brockner,et al.  Regulatory Focus Theory: Implications for the Study of Emotions at Work , 2001 .

[10]  J. L. Holland,et al.  Making vocational choices : a theory of vocational personalities and work environments , 1984 .

[11]  R. Wood.  Task complexity: Definition of the construct , 1986 .

[12]  Simcha Ronen,et al.  An underlying structure of motivational need taxonomies: A cross-cultural confirmation. , 1994 .

[13]  C. Burke,et al.  The impact of cross-training on team effectiveness. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[14]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Ego depletion: is the active self a limited resource? , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  C. Spielberger,et al.  Stress and Anxiety , 1981 .

[16]  E. Higgins,et al.  Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations : Promotion and Prevention in Decision-Making , 1997 .

[17]  J. Sinacore.  Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions , 1993 .

[18]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Self-control as limited resource: regulatory depletion patterns. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  Robert Sessions Woodworth,et al.  THE ACCURACY OF VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT , 1899 .

[20]  Gilad Chen,et al.  A multilevel integration of personality, climate, self-regulation, and performance. , 2006 .

[21]  C. Carver,et al.  Attention and Self-Regulation: A Control-Theory Approach to Human Behavior , 1981 .

[22]  Christian H. Jordan,et al.  Motivation by positive or negative role models: regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  John R. Hollenbeck,et al.  Cooperation, competition and team performance: Toward a contingency approach , 2002 .

[24]  M. D. Dunnette.  Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 2005 .

[25]  Lois E. Tetrick,et al.  Handbook of occupational health psychology , 2003 .

[26]  D. Zohar.  Modifying supervisory practices to improve subunit safety: a leadership-based intervention model. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[27]  D. Zohar.  A group-level model of safety climate: testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[28]  E. Higgins.  Making a good decision: value from fit. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[29]  S. Schwartz.  Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries , 1992 .

[30]  P. Ackerman,et al.  Motivation and cognitive abilities: an integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition , 1989 .

[31]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Effects of Training Goals and Goal Orientation Traits on Multidimensional Training Outcomes and Performance Adaptability. , 2001, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[32]  William M. Smith,et al.  A Study of Thinking , 1956 .

[33]  P. Ackerman,et al.  A self-regulatory skills perspective to reducing cognitive interference. , 1996 .

[34]  Jens Förster,et al.  Speed/accuracy decisions in task performance: Built-in trade-off or separate strategic concerns? , 2003 .

[35]  E. Higgins,et al.  Beyond pleasure and pain. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[36]  Gilad Chen,et al.  A multilevel examination of the relationships among training outcomes, mediating regulatory processes, and adaptive performance. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[37]  Scott Mondore,et al.  Safety climate as a mediator between foundation climates and occupational accidents: a group-level investigation. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[38]  Abraham H. Maslow,et al.  Eupsychian management : a journal , 1965 .