Comparison of two image quality models

In recent years a number of different vision models have been proposed to assist in the evaluation of image quality. However, there have been few attempts to independently evaluate these models and to make comparisons between them. In this paper we first summarize the work that has been done in image quality modeling. We then select two of the leading image quality models, the Daly Visible Differences Predictor and the Sarnoff Visual Discrimination Model, for further study. We begin by describing our implementation, which was done from the published papers, of each of the models. We next discuss the similarities and the differences between the two models. The paper ends with a summary of the important advantages of each approach. The comparison of these two models is presented in the context of our research interests which are image quality evaluation for both computer imaging and computer graphics tasks. The paper includes illustrations drawn from these two areas.

[1]  Ernest L. Hall,et al.  A Nonlinear Model for the Spatial Characteristics of the Human Visual System , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[2]  Jeffrey Lubin,et al.  A VISUAL DISCRIMINATION MODEL FOR IMAGING SYSTEM DESIGN AND EVALUATION , 1995 .

[3]  Christoph Zetzsche,et al.  Multiple Channel Model For The Prediction Of Subjective Image Quality , 1989, Photonics West - Lasers and Applications in Science and Engineering.

[4]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  A filter design technique for steerable pyramid image transforms , 1996, 1996 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Conference Proceedings.

[5]  Jr. Thomas G. Stockham,et al.  Image processing in the context of a visual model , 1972 .

[6]  Charles J. C. Lloyd,et al.  Design of a spatial-chromatic human vision model for evaluating full-color display systems , 1990, Other Conferences.

[7]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  The Design and Use of Steerable Filters , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[8]  O. Faugeras Digital color image processing within the framework of a human visual model , 1979 .

[9]  A B Watson,et al.  Efficiency of a model human image code. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[10]  A B Watson,et al.  Estimation of local spatial scale. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[11]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  The Laplacian Pyramid as a Compact Image Code , 1983, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[12]  William F. Schreiber,et al.  Fundamentals of electronic imaging systems : some aspects of image processing , 1986 .

[13]  Peter G. J. Barten The Square Root Integral (SQRI): A New Metric To Describe The Effect Of Various Display Parameters On Perceived Image Quality , 1989, Photonics West - Lasers and Applications in Science and Engineering.

[14]  J. Bergen,et al.  A four mechanism model for threshold spatial vision , 1979, Vision Research.

[15]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Contrast masking in human vision. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[16]  Gary W. Meyer,et al.  A frequency based ray tracer , 1995, SIGGRAPH.