Sparse dictionary methods for EEG signal classification in face perception

This paper presents a systematic application of machine learning techniques for classifying high-density EEG signals elicited by face and non-face stimuli. The two stimuli used here are derived from the vase-faces illusion and share the same defining contours, differing only slightly in stimulus space. This emphasizes activity differences related to high-level percepts rather than low-level attributes. This design decision results in a difficult classification task for the ensuing EEG signals. Traditionally, EEG analyses are done on the basis of signal processing techniques involving multiple instance averaging and then a manual examination to detect differentiating components. The present study constitutes an agnostic effort based on purely statistical estimates of three major classifiers: L1-norm logistic regression, group lasso and k Nearest Neighbors (kNN); kNN produced the worst results. L1 regression and group lasso show significantly better performance, while being abl e to identify distinct spatio-temporal signatures. Both L1 regression and group lasso assert the saliency of samples in 170ms, 250ms, 400ms and 600ms after stimulus onset, congruent with the previously reported ERP components associated with face perception. Similarly, spatial locations of salient markers point to the occipital and temporal brain regions, previously implicated in visual object perception. The overall approach presented here can provide a principled way of identifying EEG correlates of other perceptual/cognitive tasks.

[1]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  An efficient P300-based brain–computer interface for disabled subjects , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[2]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent. , 2010, Journal of statistical software.

[3]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  S. Makeig Auditory event-related dynamics of the EEG spectrum and effects of exposure to tones. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  Support vector EEG classification in the Fourier and time-frequency correlation domains , 2003, First International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering, 2003. Conference Proceedings..

[6]  Benjamin Balas,et al.  EEG correlates of categorical and graded face perception , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  M. Yuan,et al.  Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables , 2006 .

[8]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  Classification of EEG signals using Dempster Shafer theory and a k-nearest neighbor classifier , 2009, 2009 4th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering.

[9]  Tzyy-Ping Jung,et al.  Independent Component Analysis of Electroencephalographic Data , 1995, NIPS.

[10]  Ahmet Alkan,et al.  Automatic seizure detection in EEG using logistic regression and artificial neural network , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[11]  M. Eimer Event-related brain potentials distinguish processing stages involved in face perception and recognition , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[12]  Tom Heskes,et al.  Interpreting single trial data using groupwise regularisation , 2009, NeuroImage.

[13]  Benjamin Balas,et al.  EEG correlates of categorical and graded face perception , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  K.-R. Muller,et al.  Optimizing Spatial filters for Robust EEG Single-Trial Analysis , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[15]  Volker Roth,et al.  The Group-Lasso for generalized linear models: uniqueness of solutions and efficient algorithms , 2008, ICML '08.

[16]  J. Haxby,et al.  Human neural systems for face recognition and social communication , 2002, Biological Psychiatry.

[17]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[18]  G. Rees,et al.  Neuroimaging: Decoding mental states from brain activity in humans , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.