Post Hoc Analysis of Lorlatinib Intracranial Efficacy and Safety in Patients With ALK-Positive Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer From the Phase III CROWN Study

PURPOSE Lorlatinib significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus crizotinib and showed robust intracranial activity in patients with previously untreated advanced ALK-positive non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the phase III CROWN trial. Here, we report post hoc efficacy outcomes in patients with and without brain metastases at baseline, and present data on the incidence and management of CNS adverse events (AEs) in CROWN. METHODS Eligible patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to first-line lorlatinib (100 mg once daily) or crizotinib (250 mg twice a day); no crossover between treatment arms was permitted. Tumor assessments, including CNS magnetic resonance imaging, were performed at screening and then at 8-week intervals. Regular assessments of patient-reported outcomes were conducted. RESULTS PFS by blinded independent central review was improved with lorlatinib versus crizotinib in patients with and without brain metastases at baseline (12-month PFS rates: 78% v 22% and 78% v 45%, respectively). Lorlatinib was associated with lower 12-month cumulative incidence of CNS progression versus crizotinib in patients with (7% v 72%) and without (1% v 18%) brain metastases at baseline. In total, 35% of patients had CNS AEs with lorlatinib, most of grade 1 severity. Occurrence of CNS AEs did not result in a clinically meaningful difference in patient-reported quality of life. At analysis, 56% of CNS AEs had resolved (33% without intervention; 17% with lorlatinib dose modification), and 38% were unresolved; most required no intervention. Lorlatinib dose modification did not notably influence PFS. CONCLUSION First-line lorlatinib improved PFS outcomes and reduced CNS progression versus crizotinib in patients with advanced ALK-positive non–small-cell lung cancer with or without brain metastases at baseline. Half of all CNS AEs resolved without intervention or with lorlatinib dose modification.

[1]  Ying Cheng,et al.  Ensartinib vs Crizotinib for Patients With Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase−Positive Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2021, JAMA oncology.

[2]  L. James,et al.  Lorlatinib Exposure‐Response Analyses for Safety and Efficacy in a Phase I/II Trial to Support Benefit–Risk Assessment in Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2021, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[3]  S. Ou,et al.  Lorlatinib Should Be Considered as the Preferred First-Line Option in Patients With Advanced ALK-Rearranged NSCLC. , 2021, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[4]  D. Camidge Lorlatinib Should Not be Considered as the Preferred First-Line Option in Patients With Advanced ALK Rearranged NSCLC. , 2021, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[5]  A. Shaw,et al.  MA11.08 Patient-Reported Outcomes from the Randomized Phase 3 CROWN Study of First-Line Lorlatinib versus Crizotinib in ALK+ NSCLC , 2021 .

[6]  A. Shaw,et al.  First-Line Lorlatinib or Crizotinib in Advanced ALK-Positive Lung Cancer. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  Jie Yang,et al.  Brigatinib Versus Crizotinib in Advanced ALK Inhibitor–Naive ALK-Positive Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Second Interim Analysis of the Phase III ALTA-1L Trial , 2020, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  A. Shaw,et al.  TEMPORARY REMOVAL: Updated overall survival and final progression-free survival data for patients with treatment-naïve advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer in the ALEX study. , 2020, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[9]  Young Hak Kim,et al.  Final progression-free survival results from the J-ALEX study of alectinib versus crizotinib in ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2019, Lung cancer.

[10]  A. Shaw,et al.  Clinical Management of Adverse Events Associated with Lorlatinib. , 2019, The oncologist.

[11]  A. Shaw,et al.  Lorlatinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: results from a global phase 2 study. , 2018, The Lancet. Oncology.

[12]  A. Drilon,et al.  Frequency of Brain Metastases and Multikinase Inhibitor Outcomes in Patients With RET–Rearranged Lung Cancers , 2018, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[13]  C. Gridelli,et al.  Brigatinib versus Crizotinib in ALK‐Positive Non–Small‐Cell Lung Cancer , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  A. Shaw,et al.  Alectinib versus crizotinib in treatment-naive anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) non-small-cell lung cancer: CNS efficacy results from the ALEX study , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[15]  S Morin-Ben Abdallah,et al.  Brain metastases in non-small-cell lung cancer: are tyrosine kinase inhibitors and checkpoint inhibitors now viable options? , 2018, Current oncology.

[16]  M. Gubens,et al.  Economic impact of preventing brain metastases with alectinib in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer. , 2018, Lung cancer.

[17]  A. Shaw,et al.  Lorlatinib in ALK- or ROS1-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer: an international, multicenter, open-label phase 1 trial , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[18]  E. Walters,et al.  Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  L. Schwartzberg,et al.  Effect of Brain Metastasis on Patient‐Reported Outcomes in Advanced NSCLC Treated in Real‐World Community Oncology Settings , 2017, Clinical lung cancer.

[20]  Rafal Dziadziuszko,et al.  Alectinib versus Crizotinib in Untreated ALK‐Positive Non–Small‐Cell Lung Cancer , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  Serafino Pantano,et al.  First-line ceritinib versus platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (ASCEND-4): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study , 2017, The Lancet.

[22]  D. Costa,et al.  Brain metastases in patients with EGFR-mutated or ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancers. , 2015, Lung cancer.

[23]  E. Wu,et al.  Brain metastases in patients with ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer: clinical symptoms, treatment patterns and economic burden , 2015, Journal of medical economics.

[24]  A. Roughley,et al.  Impact of Brain Metastases on Quality of Life and Estimated Life Expectancy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. , 2014, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[25]  A. Hauschild,et al.  Dabrafenib in patients with Val600Glu or Val600Lys BRAF-mutant melanoma metastatic to the brain (BREAK-MB): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. , 2012, The Lancet. Oncology.

[26]  T. Noh,et al.  Brain metastasis: clinical manifestations, symptom management, and palliative care. , 2018, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[27]  D. Osoba,et al.  Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.