Ethical issues in field trials of genetically modified disease-resistant mosquitoes.

Mosquito-borne diseases take a tremendous toll on human populations, especially in developing nations. In the last decade, scientists have developed mosquitoes that have been genetically modified to prevent transmission of mosquito-borne diseases, and field trials have been conducted. Some mosquitoes have been rendered infertile, some have been equipped with a vaccine they transmit to humans, and some have been designed to resist diseases. This article focuses on ethical issues raised by field trials of disease-resistant, genetically modified mosquitoes. Some of these issues include: protecting the public and the environment from harm, balancing benefits and risks, collaborating with the local community, avoiding exploitation, and safeguarding the rights and welfare of research subjects. One of the most difficult problems involves protecting the welfare of community members who will be impacted by the release of mosquitoes but who are not enrolled in the study as research subjects. To address this concern, field trials should take place only when the targeted disease is a significant public health problem in an isolated area, the benefits of the trial for the community are likely to outweigh the risks, community leaders approve of the trial, and there are measures in place to protect the welfare of un-enrolled community members, such as informing the community about the study and offering free treatment to people who contract mosquito-borne diseases. Since the justification of any field trial depends on a careful examination of the scientific and ethical issues, proposed studies should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

[1]  J. Brady,et al.  The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. , 2014, The Journal of the American College of Dentists.

[2]  C. Munthe Environmental Health Ethics. , 2013 .

[3]  A. Maxmen Florida abuzz over mosquito plan , 2012, Nature.

[4]  C. Elliott Justice for injured research subjects. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Lucas A. Nell,et al.  The Evolutionary Consequences of Blood-Stage Vaccination on the Rodent Malaria Plasmodium chabaudi , 2012, PLoS biology.

[6]  A. James,et al.  Transgenic Anopheles stephensi coexpressing single-chain antibodies resist Plasmodium falciparum development , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  D. Resnik Environmental Health Ethics: Conclusion , 2012 .

[8]  Megan Kearl,et al.  45 CFR 46: Protection of Human Subjects under United States Law (1974) , 2012 .

[9]  J. Sim,et al.  Informed consent and cluster-randomized trials. , 2012, American journal of public health.

[10]  J. Bryk,et al.  Scientific Standards and the Regulation of Genetically Modified Insects , 2012, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[11]  G. Dimopoulos,et al.  Engineered Anopheles Immunity to Plasmodium Infection , 2011, PLoS pathogens.

[12]  C. Donnelly,et al.  Field performance of engineered male mosquitoes , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[13]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Who is the research subject in cluster randomized trials in health research? , 2011, Trials.

[14]  M. Enserink Science and society. GM mosquito trial alarms opponents, strains ties in Gates-funded project. , 2010, Science.

[15]  A. Wertheimer Rethinking the Ethics of Clinical Research , 2010 .

[16]  T. Scott,et al.  Towards a framework for community engagement in global health research. , 2010, Trends in parasitology.

[17]  S. Yoshida,et al.  Flying vaccinator; a transgenic mosquito delivers a Leishmania vaccine via blood feeding , 2010, Insect molecular biology.

[18]  Michael A Tolle,et al.  Mosquito-borne diseases. , 2009, Current problems in pediatric and adolescent health care.

[19]  L. Gostin,et al.  A broader liberty: J.S. Mill, paternalism and the public's health. , 2009, Public health.

[20]  John M. Marshall,et al.  Malaria Control with Transgenic Mosquitoes , 2009, PLoS medicine.

[21]  T. Scott,et al.  Ethical, social, and cultural considerations for site selection for research with genetically modified mosquitoes. , 2008, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[22]  A. James,et al.  Guidance for contained field trials of vector mosquitoes engineered to contain a gene drive system: recommendations of a scientific working group. , 2008, Vector borne and zoonotic diseases.

[23]  D. Resnik,et al.  Protecting third parties in human subjects research. , 2006, IRB.

[24]  S. Sinkins,et al.  Gene drive systems for insect disease vectors , 2006, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[25]  E. Susser,et al.  Paternalism and the public's health , 2006, Chronic Illness.

[26]  D. Macer Ethical, legal and social issues of genetically modifying insect vectors for public health. , 2005, Insect biochemistry and molecular biology.

[27]  Ezekiel J Emanuel,et al.  What makes clinical research in developing countries ethical? The benchmarks of ethical research. , 2004, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[28]  N. Kass An ethics framework for public health. , 2001, American journal of public health.

[29]  E. Walker,et al.  Managing Risks of Arthropod Vector Research , 2000, Science.

[30]  C. Grady,et al.  What makes clinical research ethical? , 2000, JAMA.

[31]  C. Dolea,et al.  World Health Organization , 1949, International Organization.

[32]  R. Greco The protocol , 2008, Nature.

[33]  C. Foster,et al.  International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects , 1994, Bulletin of medical ethics.