Assessing ecologically sustainable agricultural land-use in the Central Pyrénées at the field and landscape level

Abstract Sustainable land use in agricultural systems involves the implementation of agricultural practices at the landscape level instead of at a field level. To test the above hypothesis a case study was conducted in two valleys of the Central Pyrenees (France), with two villages using two contrasting farming patterns: one village used a strong group organisation of agricultural practices at the valley level, while the other used a collection of practices at the field level. Two indicators of landscape organisation were used on both villages. The first indicator was the statistical contribution of the environment to the choice of agricultural practices by farmers, and was calculated at the field level on the overall valley territory. The second indicator was based on relationships between agro-ecological units and farms, measured at the valley level. The comparison between the group practices organised at the valley level and the individual practices organised at the field level showed that the latter system, with fragile and unstable agro-ecological units, had spatially specialised farms, and environmentally independent agricultural practices. Conversely the group practices used at the valley level were linked to stable agro-ecological units, fragmented farms, and environmentally dependent agricultural practices. The ecological sustainability of larger territories seemed to be in opposition with the standard criteria judging economical sustainability of farms. This analysis showed that the dependence of agricultural practices on the environmental features (i.e. the valley level versus the individual farm) secured the sustainability of the resources and landscape, even if it was in contradiction with a farm’s economical criteria. The assessment of agro-environmental practices at a landscape level, intended as a natural level of organisation (such as valleys or watersheds) and larger than the plot level, is necessary, in order to enhance the effectiveness of future agricultural policies.

[1]  E. Newman,et al.  Towards a unified ecology: T.F.H. Allen and T.W. Hoekstra, 1992. Columbia University Press, New York. Paperback, xiv + 384 pp. Price: $32.50. ISBN 0-231-06919-7 , 1994 .

[2]  M. Hill,et al.  Data analysis in community and landscape ecology , 1987 .

[3]  M. Palmer PUTTING THINGS IN EVEN BETTER ORDER: THE ADVANTAGES OF CANONICAL CORRESPONDENCE ANALYSIS' , 1993 .

[4]  S. E. Jørgensen,et al.  Introduction to environmental management , 1991 .

[5]  F. D. Pietro,et al.  Dynamique des pratiques pastorales et des paysages : une approche pluri-échelles appliquée aux Pyrénées Ariégeoises (France) , 1997 .

[6]  M. Richardot-Coulet,et al.  L'analyse des relations espèces-milieu par l'analyse canonique des correspondances. I: Variables de milieu quantitatives , 1988 .

[7]  C. Braak Canonical Correspondence Analysis: A New Eigenvector Technique for Multivariate Direct Gradient Analysis , 1986 .

[8]  T. Allen,et al.  Toward a Unified Ecology. , 1994 .

[9]  Thomas B. Starr,et al.  Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity , 1982 .

[10]  W. Covington,et al.  Sustainable ecological systems: Implementing an ecological approach to land management, implications for ponderosa pine/bunchgrass ecological systems , 1993 .

[11]  Richard Lowrance,et al.  A hierarchical approach to sustainable agriculture , 1986 .

[12]  Jeffery W. Bentley,et al.  Wouldn't you like to have all of your land in one place? land fragmentation in Northwest Portugal , 1990 .

[13]  Teodoro Lasanta Martínez Organisation spatiale et dynamique récente de l'utilisation agraire du sol dans les Pyrénées centrales espagnoles , 1989 .

[14]  Louise O. Fresco,et al.  Time and spatial scales in ecological sustainability , 1992 .

[15]  R. O'Neill A Hierarchical Concept of Ecosystems. , 1986 .

[16]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  A Theory of Gradient Analysis , 2004 .

[17]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  The analysis of vegetation-environment relationships by canonical correspondence analysis , 1987 .

[18]  Hans-Hermann Bock,et al.  Classification and Related Methods of Data Analysis , 1988 .

[19]  S. Pickett,et al.  Ecological systems and the concept of biological organization. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  Partial canonical correspondence analysis , 1988 .