Joint Strength and Wall Deformation Characteristics of a Single-Cell Geocell Subjected to Uniaxial Compression

Geocells are three-dimensional expandable panels with a wide range of applications in geotechnical engineering. A geocell is made up of many internally connected single cells. The current study discusses the joint strength and the wall deformation characteristics of a single cell when it is subjected to uniaxial compression. The study helps to understand the causes for the failure of the single cell in a cellular confinement system. Experimental studies were conducted on single cells with cell pockets filled up with three different infill materials, namely silty clay, sand, and the aggregates. The results of the experimental study revealed that the deformation of the geocell wall decreases with the increase in the friction angle of the infill material. Experimental results were also validated using numerical simulations carried out using Lagrangian analysis software. The experiment and the numerical results were found to be in good agreement with each other. A simple analytical model based on the theory of thin cylinders is also proposed to calculate the accumulated strain of the geocell wall. This model operates under a simple elastic solution framework. The proposed model slightly overestimates the strains as compared with experimental and numerical values. (C) 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.

[1]  A. Emersleben,et al.  Interaction Between Hoop Stresses and Passive Earth Resistance in Single and Multiple Geocell Structures , 2009 .

[2]  François Nicot,et al.  Uniaxial compressive behavior of scrapped tire and sand-filled wire netted geocell with a geotextile envelope , 2011 .

[3]  Xiaoming Yang,et al.  Accelerated pavement testing of unpaved roads with geocell-reinforced sand bases , 2012 .

[4]  Nagaratnam Sivakugan,et al.  Behaviour of prestressed geotextile-reinforced sand bed supporting a loaded circular footing , 2010 .

[5]  N. R. Krishnaswamy,et al.  Experimental and Theoretical Investigations on Geocell-Supported Embankments , 2006 .

[6]  T. G. Sitharam,et al.  Design and construction of geocell foundation to support the embankment on settled red mud , 2013 .

[7]  Reza Ziaie Moayed,et al.  Numerical study on stability analysis of geocell reinforced slopes by considering the bending effect , 2013 .

[8]  Craig H. Benson,et al.  Laboratory evaluation of geocell-reinforced gravel subbase over poor subgrades , 2013 .

[9]  Alex T. Visser,et al.  The stress-strain behaviour of multiple cell geocell packs , 2009 .

[10]  Andrew Dawson,et al.  Combined use of geocell reinforcement and rubber–soil mixtures to improve performance of buried pipes , 2012 .

[11]  Ben Leshchinsky,et al.  Effects of Geocell Confinement on Strength and Deformation Behavior of Gravel , 2013 .

[12]  Xuejun Wen,et al.  Model studies on geogrid- or geocell-reinforced sand cushion on soft soil , 2008 .

[13]  T. G. Sitharam,et al.  Experimental and numerical studies on footings supported on geocell reinforced sand and clay beds , 2013 .

[14]  Sujit Kumar Dash,et al.  Bearing capacity of circular footing on geocell–sand mattress overlying clay bed with void , 2009 .

[15]  S. Dash Influence of Relative Density of Soil on Performance of Geocell-Reinforced Sand Foundations , 2010 .

[16]  Sujit Kumar Dash,et al.  Numerical Simulation of the Behavior of Geocell Reinforced Sand in Foundations , 2009 .

[17]  Sujit Kumar Dash,et al.  Effect of Geocell Type on Load-Carrying Mechanisms of Geocell-Reinforced Sand Foundations , 2012 .

[18]  Jie Han,et al.  Performance of Geocell-Reinforced RAP Bases over Weak Subgrade under Full-Scale Moving Wheel Loads , 2011 .