Deep turbulence effects compensation experiments with a cascaded adaptive optics system using a 3.63 m telescope.

Compensation of extended (deep) turbulence effects is one of the most challenging problems in adaptive optics (AO). In the AO approach described, the deep turbulence wave propagation regime was achieved by imaging stars at low elevation angles when image quality improvement with conventional AO was poor. These experiments were conducted at the U.S. Air Force Maui Optical and Supercomputing Site (AMOS) by using the 3.63 m telescope located on Haleakala, Maui. To enhance compensation performance we used a cascaded AO system composed of a conventional AO system based on a Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor and a deformable mirror with 941 actuators, and an AO system based on stochastic parallel gradient descent optimization with four deformable mirrors (75 control channels). This first-time field demonstration of a cascaded AO system achieved considerably improved performance of wavefront phase aberration compensation. Image quality was improved in a repeatable way in the presence of stressing atmospheric conditions obtained by using stars at elevation angles as low as 15 degrees.

[1]  Vorontsov,et al.  Adaptive optics based on analog parallel stochastic optimization: analysis and experimental demonstration , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[2]  David L. Fried,et al.  Branch point problem in adaptive optics , 1998 .

[3]  David L Fried,et al.  Evaluation of the performance of Hartmann sensors in strong scintillation. , 2002, Applied optics.

[4]  Mikhail A. Vorontsov,et al.  Stochastic parallel-gradient-descent technique for high-resolution wave-front phase-distortion correction , 1998 .

[5]  M A Vorontsov,et al.  Adaptive phase-distortion correction based on parallel gradient-descent optimization. , 1997, Optics letters.

[6]  Mikhail A. Vorontsov,et al.  Pocket Deformable Mirror for Adaptive Optics Applications , 2006 .

[7]  Lewis C. Roberts,et al.  Characterization of the AEOS Adaptive Optics System , 2002 .

[8]  Gert Cauwenberghs,et al.  Micro-scale Adaptive optics: Wavefront Control with μ-mirror Array and VLSI Stochastic Gradient Descent Controller , 2001 .

[9]  Mikhail A Vorontsov,et al.  Adaptive wavefront control with asynchronous stochastic parallel gradient descent clusters. , 2006, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[10]  G. Tyler,et al.  Reconstruction and assessment of the least-squares and slope discrepancy components of the phase. , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[11]  D. Fried.  Anisoplanatism in adaptive optics , 1982 .

[12]  S. Kireev,et al.  Variations of refraction angles from observations of the Moon from space. , 1994, Applied optics.

[13]  T Weyrauch,et al.  Microscale Adaptive Optics: Wave-Front Control with a mu-Mirror Array and a VLSI Stochastic Gradient Descent Controller. , 2001, Applied optics.

[14]  O. Tikhomirova,et al.  Theory of singular-phase reconstruction for an optical speckle field in the turbulent atmosphere. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[15]  R. Muller,et al.  Real-time correction of atmospherically degraded telescope images through image sharpening , 1974 .

[16]  Strehl ratios with various types of anisoplanatism , 1992 .

[17]  Mikhail A Vorontsov,et al.  Atmospheric compensation with a speckle beacon in strong scintillation conditions: directed energy and laser communication applications. , 2005, Applied optics.

[18]  Mingzhou Chen,et al.  Detection of phase singularities with a Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor. , 2007, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.