Basin‐scale assessment of the land surface water budget in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction operational and research NLDAS‐2 systems

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the components of the land surface water budget in the four land surface models (Noah, SAC-Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting Model, (VIC) Variable Infiltration Capacity Model, and Mosaic) applied in the newly implemented National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) operational and research versions of the North American Land Data Assimilation System version 2 (NLDAS-2). This work focuses on monthly and annual components of the water budget over 12 National Weather Service (NWS) River Forecast Centers (RFCs). Monthly gridded FLUX Network (FLUXNET) evapotranspiration (ET) from the Max-Planck Institute (MPI) of Germany, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) total runoff (Q), changes in total water storage (dS/dt, derived as a residual by utilizing MPI ET and USGS Q in the water balance equation), and Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) observed total water storage anomaly (TWSA) and change (TWSC) are used as reference data sets. Compared to these ET and Q benchmarks, Mosaic and SAC (Noah and VIC) in the operational NLDAS-2 overestimate (underestimate) mean annual reference ET and underestimate (overestimate) mean annual reference Q. The multimodel ensemble mean (MME) is closer to the mean annual reference ET and Q. An anomaly correlation (AC) analysis shows good AC values for simulated monthly mean Q and dS/dt but significantly smaller AC values for simulated ET. Upgraded versions of the models utilized in the research side of NLDAS-2 yield largely improved performance in the simulation of these mean annual and monthly water component diagnostics. These results demonstrate that the three intertwined efforts of improving (1) the scientific understanding of parameterization of land surface processes, (2) the spatial and temporal extent of systematic validation of land surface processes, and (3) the engineering-oriented aspects such as parameter calibration and optimization are key to substantially improving product quality in various land data assimilation systems.

[1]  Eric F. Wood,et al.  An efficient calibration method for continental‐scale land surface modeling , 2008 .

[2]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models , 1994 .

[3]  M. Ek,et al.  Evaluation of NLDAS‐2 evapotranspiration against tower flux site observations , 2015 .

[4]  P. Jarvis.  The Interpretation of the Variations in Leaf Water Potential and Stomatal Conductance Found in Canopies in the Field , 1976 .

[5]  D. Lawrence,et al.  The CCSM4 Land Simulation, 1850-2005: Assessment of Surface Climate and New Capabilities , 2012 .

[6]  David Mocko,et al.  Quantifying the Added Value of Snow Cover Area Observations in Passive Microwave Snow Depth Data Assimilation , 2015 .

[7]  J. H. Steiger.  Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. , 1980 .

[8]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  NOAA's Merged Land-Ocean Surface Temperature Analysis , 2012 .

[9]  Hatim O. Sharif,et al.  Mass-Conserving Remapping of Radar Data onto Two-Dimensional Cartesian Coordinates for Hydrologic Applications , 2014 .

[10]  Kevin W. Manning,et al.  The community Noah land surface model with multiparameterization options (Noah-MP): 1. Model description and evaluation with local-scale measurements , 2011 .

[11]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[12]  J. D. Tarpley,et al.  Implementation of Noah land surface model advances in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction operational mesoscale Eta model , 2003 .

[13]  M. Ek,et al.  Comparative analysis of relationships between NLDAS‐2 forcings and model outputs , 2012 .

[14]  J. D. Tarpley,et al.  Evaluation of the North American Land Data Assimilation System over the southern Great Plains during the warm season , 2003 .

[15]  Praveen Kumar,et al.  A Catchment-Based Approach to Modeling Land Surface Processes in a Gcm, Part 2: Parameter Estimation and Model Demonstration , 2013 .

[16]  B. Scanlon,et al.  GRACE satellite monitoring of large depletion in water storage in response to the 2011 drought in Texas , 2013 .

[17]  K. Mitchell,et al.  Impact of Atmospheric Surface-layer Parameterizations in the new Land-surface Scheme of the NCEP Mesoscale Eta Model , 1997 .

[18]  S. Swenson,et al.  Methods for inferring regional surface‐mass anomalies from Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) measurements of time‐variable gravity , 2002 .

[19]  M. Ek,et al.  Comparison of NLDAS-2 Simulated and NASMD Observed Daily Soil Moisture. Part II: Impact of Soil Texture Classification and Vegetation Type Mismatches , 2015 .

[20]  Luke J. Marzen,et al.  Validation of evaporation estimates from a modified surface energy balance algorithm for land (SEBAL) model in the south-eastern United States , 2012 .

[21]  Claude N. Williams,et al.  Improved Historical Temperature and Precipitation Time Series for U.S. Climate Divisions , 2014 .

[22]  A. Slater,et al.  A multimodel simulation of pan-Arctic hydrology , 2007 .

[23]  A. Bondeau,et al.  Towards global empirical upscaling of FLUXNET eddy covariance observations: validation of a model tree ensemble approach using a biosphere model , 2009 .

[24]  A. Arneth,et al.  Global patterns of land-atmosphere fluxes of carbon dioxide, latent heat, and sensible heat derived from eddy covariance, satellite, and meteorological observations , 2011 .

[25]  R. Neale,et al.  Improvements in a half degree atmosphere/land version of the CCSM , 2010 .

[26]  Randal D. Koster,et al.  A Catchment-Based Approach to Modeling Land Surface Processes in a Gcm, Part 1: Model Structure , 2013 .

[27]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Global intercomparison of 12 land surface heat flux estimates , 2011 .

[28]  S. Swenson,et al.  A comparison of terrestrial water storage variations from GRACE with in situ measurements from Illinois , 2006 .

[29]  M. Ek,et al.  Improved NLDAS‐2 Noah‐simulated hydrometeorological products with an interim run , 2015 .

[30]  Michael H. Cosh,et al.  Assimilation of Remotely Sensed Soil Moisture and Snow Depth Retrievals for Drought Estimation , 2014 .

[31]  Youlong Xia,et al.  Improvement of the Noah land surface model for warm season processes: evaluation of water and energy flux simulation , 2013 .

[32]  M. Ek,et al.  Continental‐scale water and energy flux analysis and validation for North American Land Data Assimilation System project phase 2 (NLDAS‐2): 2. Validation of model‐simulated streamflow , 2012 .

[33]  Praveen Kumar,et al.  A catchment‐based approach to modeling land surface processes in a general circulation model: 1. Model structure , 2000 .

[34]  Victor Zlotnicki,et al.  Time‐variable gravity from GRACE: First results , 2004 .

[35]  Lifeng Luo,et al.  An intercomparison of soil moisture fields in the North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS) , 2003 .

[36]  Victor Koren,et al.  Physically-based modifications to the Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting model. Part A: Modeling the effects of frozen ground on the runoff generation process , 2014 .

[37]  Thomas C. Brown,et al.  The complementary relationship in estimation of regional evapotranspiration: An enhanced advection‐aridity model , 2001 .

[38]  Alain Royer,et al.  Surface temperature spatial and temporal variations in North America from homogenized satellite SMMR-SSM/I microwave measurements and reanalysis for 1979-2008 , 2010 .

[39]  F. Landerer,et al.  Accuracy of scaled GRACE terrestrial water storage estimates , 2012 .

[40]  Kevin W. Manning,et al.  The community Noah land surface model with multiparameterization options (Noah-MP): 2. Evaluation over global river basins , 2011 .

[41]  M. Ek,et al.  Validation of Noah-Simulated Soil Temperature in the North American Land Data Assimilation System Phase 2 , 2013 .

[42]  W. Oechel,et al.  FLUXNET: A New Tool to Study the Temporal and Spatial Variability of Ecosystem-Scale Carbon Dioxide, Water Vapor, and Energy Flux Densities , 2001 .

[43]  Sujay V. Kumar,et al.  High-performance Earth system modeling with NASA/GSFC’s Land Information System , 2007, Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering.

[44]  D. Saville.  Multiple Comparison Procedures: The Practical Solution , 1990 .

[45]  Youlong Xia,et al.  Drought Indices Based on the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis and Ensemble NLDAS , 2011 .

[46]  Eric F. Wood,et al.  Hydrological modeling of continental-scale basins , 1997 .

[47]  M. F. Hutchinson,et al.  Interpolating Mean Rainfall Using Thin Plate Smoothing Splines , 1995, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[48]  M. Mccabe,et al.  Multi-site evaluation of terrestrial evaporation models using FLUXNET data , 2014 .

[49]  B. Cosgrove,et al.  Modification of Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting Heat Transfer Component (SAC-HT) for enhanced evapotranspiration , 2010 .

[50]  R. Koster,et al.  A catchment-based approach to modeling land surface processes in a general circulation model , 2000 .

[51]  Dennis P. Lettenmaier,et al.  Noah LSM Snow Model Diagnostics and Enhancements , 2010 .

[52]  R. Vogel,et al.  Annual hydroclimatology of the United States , 2000 .

[53]  G. Senay,et al.  A comprehensive evaluation of two MODIS evapotranspiration products over the conterminous United States: Using point and gridded FLUXNET and water balance ET , 2013 .

[54]  S. Bettadpur,et al.  Ensemble prediction and intercomparison analysis of GRACE time‐variable gravity field models , 2014 .

[55]  Zong-Liang Yang,et al.  Assessment of simulated water balance from Noah, Noah‐MP, CLM, and VIC over CONUS using the NLDAS test bed , 2014 .

[56]  Steven M. Quiring,et al.  Comparison of NLDAS-2 Simulated and NASMD Observed Daily Soil Moisture. Part I: Comparison and Analysis , 2015 .

[57]  Sujay V. Kumar,et al.  Land information system: An interoperable framework for high resolution land surface modeling , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[58]  Matthew Rodell,et al.  Water Balance in the Amazon Basin from a Land Surface Model Ensemble , 2014 .

[59]  Lifeng Luo,et al.  Streamflow and water balance intercomparisons of four land surface models in the North American Land Data Assimilation System Project , 2004 .

[60]  K. Mo,et al.  Continental-scale water and energy flux analysis and validation for the North American Land Data Assimilation System project phase 2 (NLDAS-2): 1. Intercomparison and application of model products , 2012 .

[61]  Bridget R. Scanlon,et al.  Evaluation of groundwater storage monitoring with the GRACE satellite: Case study of the High Plains aquifer, central United States , 2009 .

[62]  J. D. Tarpley,et al.  Real‐time and retrospective forcing in the North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS) project , 2003 .

[63]  Yudong Tian,et al.  Estimating evapotranspiration with land data assimilation systems , 2011 .

[64]  M. Ek,et al.  Evaluation of multi-model simulated soil moisture in NLDAS-2 , 2014 .

[65]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Evaluation of global observations‐based evapotranspiration datasets and IPCC AR4 simulations , 2011 .

[66]  J. D. Tarpley,et al.  The multi‐institution North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS): Utilizing multiple GCIP products and partners in a continental distributed hydrological modeling system , 2004 .

[67]  G. Senay,et al.  Analysis of long-term trends (1950–2009) in precipitation, runoff and runoff coefficient in major urban watersheds in the United States , 2013 .

[68]  B. Scanlon,et al.  Uncertainty in evapotranspiration from land surface modeling, remote sensing, and GRACE satellites , 2014 .

[69]  C. Daly,et al.  A Statistical-Topographic Model for Mapping Climatological Precipitation over Mountainous Terrain , 1994 .

[70]  A. Dalcher,et al.  A Simple Biosphere Model (SIB) for Use within General Circulation Models , 1986 .

[71]  N. Diffenbaugh,et al.  Near‐term acceleration of hydroclimatic change in the western U.S. , 2011 .

[72]  S. Swenson,et al.  Accuracy of GRACE mass estimates , 2006 .

[73]  David Mocko,et al.  Blending satellite‐based snow depth products with in situ observations for streamflow predictions in the Upper Colorado River Basin , 2015 .

[74]  Shih-Chieh Kao,et al.  A large-scale, high-resolution hydrological model parameter data set for climate change impact assessment for the conterminous US , 2013 .

[75]  David D. Parrish,et al.  NORTH AMERICAN REGIONAL REANALYSIS , 2006 .

[76]  Randal D. Koster,et al.  The components of a 'SVAT' scheme and their effects on a GCM's hydrological cycle , 1994 .