Consciousness Is Not Key in the Serial-versus-Parallel Debate

[1]  Elizabeth R Schotter,et al.  Eye Movements and Comprehension Are Important to Reading , 2019, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  The sentence superiority effect revisited , 2017, Cognition.

[3]  Alex L. White,et al.  Evidence of Serial Processing in Visual Word Recognition , 2018, Psychological science.

[4]  J. Grainger,et al.  OB1-Reader: A Model of Word Recognition and Eye Movements in Text Reading , 2018, Psychological review.

[5]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Readers Are Parallel Processors , 2019, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. , 2005, Psychological review.

[7]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Parallel, cascaded, interactive processing of words during sentence reading , 2019, Cognition.

[8]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Parafoveal-foveal overlap can facilitate ongoing word identification during reading: evidence from eye movements. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  A Thousand Words Are Worth a Picture , 2015, Psychological science.

[10]  Geoffrey M. Boynton,et al.  You Can’t Recognize Two Words Simultaneously , 2019, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  K. Rayner,et al.  Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. , 1998 .

[12]  John Palmer,et al.  Parallel spatial channels converge at a bottleneck in anterior word-selective cortex , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  You That Read Wrong Again! A Transposed-Word Effect in Grammaticality Judgments , 2018, Psychological science.