Soil water content monitoring on a dike model using electrical resistivity tomography

We explore the viability of electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) to quantify soil water content in a full-scale dike model. While ERT is an established method to detect changes in soil water content, the retrieval of two-dimensional water content distributions from surface-based surveys is a much more challenging application. We conducted a series of experiments on a full-scale dike model comprising rainfall and flooding events. The dike was surveyed with an ERT line down the land-side slope and monitored with permanently installed spatial time-domain reflectometry (TDR) cables for comparison. Water content changes were calculated by applying Archie’s equation and agreed well with comparison measurements from spatial TDR measurements. The saturation exponent in Archie’s equation was estimated by combining spatial TDR and ERT measurements and agreed well with literature data of comparable sands. The choice of the inversion type, e.g., time-lapse inversion or least-squares versus robust constraint, as well as the influence of inversion parameters, such as regularization and the choice of convergence criterion, is discussed in the context of an apparent inversion artefact for the rainfall experiment, using forward modelling of synthetic data sets. The results indicate that ERT may be a feasible method to quantify water content changes under certain conditions, provided an initial water content estimate is available. © 2011 EAGE

[1]  H. Vereecken,et al.  Imaging and characterisation of subsurface solute transport using electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and equivalent transport models , 2002 .

[2]  C. Hauck,et al.  Inversion and interpretation of two‐dimensional geoelectrical measurements for detecting permafrost in mountainous regions , 2003 .

[3]  A. Sato,et al.  Three‐dimensional spatial and temporal monitoring of soil water content using electrical resistivity tomography , 2001 .

[4]  Alex Brandelik,et al.  Moisture Monitoring in Waste Disposal Surface Barriers , 2003, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[5]  A. Binley,et al.  Examination of Solute Transport in an Undisturbed Soil Column Using Electrical Resistance Tomography , 1996 .

[6]  A. Binley,et al.  Cross-hole electrical imaging of a controlled saline tracer injection , 2000 .

[7]  N. T. Vu,et al.  Multi-electrode measurements at Thai Binh dikes (Vietnam) , 2003 .

[8]  R. Greco Soil water content inverse profiling from single TDR waveforms , 2006 .

[9]  C. Ulrich,et al.  Induced polarization measurements on unsaturated, unconsolidated sands , 2004 .

[10]  S. Gorelick,et al.  Hydrogeophysical tracking of three‐dimensional tracer migration: The concept and application of apparent petrophysical relations , 2006 .

[11]  Douglas LaBrecque,et al.  Difference Inversion of ERT Data: a Fast Inversion Method for 3-D In Situ Monitoring , 2001 .

[12]  A. Binley,et al.  A 3D ERT study of solute transport in a large experimental tank , 2002 .

[13]  B. Oswald,et al.  Spatially resolved water content profiles from inverted time domain reflectometry signals , 2003 .

[14]  Andreas Weller,et al.  The effect of dike geometry on different resistivity configurations , 2005 .

[15]  Herve Perroud,et al.  On the use of combined geophysical methods to assess water content and water conductivity of near-surface formations , 2002 .

[16]  M. Toksöz,et al.  Velocity variations and water content estimated from multi-offset, ground-penetrating radar , 1996 .

[17]  A. Binley,et al.  Seasonal variation of moisture content in unsaturated sandstone inferred from borehole radar and resistivity profiles. , 2002 .

[18]  Anita Turesson,et al.  Water content and porosity estimated from ground-penetrating radar and resistivity , 2006 .

[19]  R. Wolke,et al.  Iteratively Reweighted Least Squares: Algorithms, Convergence Analysis, and Numerical Comparisons , 1988 .

[20]  U. Wollschläger,et al.  Estimation of Temporal Changes of Volumetric Soil Water Content from Ground-Penetrating Radar Reflections , 2005 .

[21]  Andreas Kemna,et al.  Imaging of Water Content Distributions inside a Lysimeter using GPR Tomography , 2004 .

[22]  J. Nitao,et al.  Electrical resistivity tomography of vadose water movement , 1992 .

[23]  J. D. Redman,et al.  Measuring and Modeling of Direct Ground Wave Depth Penetration Under Transient Soil Moisture Conditions , 2004, Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Grounds Penetrating Radar, 2004. GPR 2004..

[24]  T. Dahlin,et al.  A comparison of smooth and blocky inversion methods in 2D electrical imaging surveys , 2001 .

[25]  David Gustafsson,et al.  A new in situ sensor for large-scale snow-cover monitoring , 2004, Annals of Glaciology.

[26]  R. Barker,et al.  Least-squares deconvolution of apparent resistivity pseudosections , 1995 .

[27]  Koichi Suzuki,et al.  Groundwater flow after heavy rain in landslide-slope area from 2-D inversion of resistivity monitoring data , 2001 .

[28]  Kamini Singha,et al.  Effects of spatially variable resolution on field-scale estimates of tracer concentration from electrical inversions using Archie’s law , 2006 .

[29]  Christof Huebner,et al.  Combined TDR and Low-Frequency Permittivity Measurements for Continuous Snow Wetness and Snow Density Determination , 2005 .

[30]  Andrew Binley,et al.  Electrical resistance tomography. , 2000 .

[31]  S. Constable,et al.  Occam's inversion to generate smooth, two-dimensional models from magnetotelluric data , 1990 .

[32]  S. Schlaeger,et al.  A fast TDR-inversion technique for the reconstruction of spatial soil moisture content , 2005 .

[33]  Susan S. Hubbard,et al.  Field‐scale estimation of volumetric water content using ground‐penetrating radar ground wave techniques , 2003 .

[34]  Andrew Binley,et al.  Applying petrophysical models to radar travel time and electrical resistivity tomograms: Resolution‐dependent limitations , 2005 .

[35]  Torleif Dahlin,et al.  2.5D resistivity modeling of embankment dams to assess influence from geometry and material properties , 2006 .