Clinical Level of Evidence Presented at the Lumbar Spine Research Society (LSRS) Annual Meeting Over 10 Years (2008-2017): A Systematic Review.

STUDY DESIGN Systematic Review OBJECTIVE.: The Lumbar Spine Research Society (LSRS) is dedicated to advancing knowledge of the lumbar spine to promote evidence-based care. We sought to systematically review the level of clinical evidence presented at LSRS annual meetings from 2008 through 2017. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Improvements in clinical evidence have been reported at similar bone and joint scientific meetings. METHODS A total of 458 paper abstracts presented at LSRS annual meetings were independently assessed by two reviewers. Only clinical studies being included for analysis. Reviewers designated a clinical level of evidence (LOE) to each included abstract from level I to level IV based on criteria set forth by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Reviewer agreement was assessed using Cohens Kappa coefficient (k). Student's t-test was used to assess for differences in mean LOE grades. Chi-squared testing was used to assess nonrandom changes in level of evidence. RESULTS A total of 299 abstracts met inclusion criteria. Over the last ten LSRS meetings, 2.68% of the presentations were level I, 22.4% were level II, 37.1% were level III, and 37.8% were level IV. We found the average LOE from 2008 to 2017 to be 3.10 (median = 3). Additionally, 63.9% presentations were Therapeutic Studies, 30.1% were Prognostic Studies, and 6.02% were Diagnostic studies. When comparing the first five years (2008-2012) to the last five years (2013-2017), we observed a significant increase in Level II (p < 0.05) and Level III (p < 0.05) evidence along with a corresponding decrease in level IV evidence (p < 0.01). The average LOE improved significantly from 3.28 (2008-2012) to 2.88 (2013-2017) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Emphasis on evidence-based medicine within spine surgery, specifically pertaining to the lumbar spine, has positively influenced the clinical LOE disseminated at LSRS annual meetings between 2008 and 2017. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4.

[1]  N. Simunovic,et al.  Level of Clinical Evidence Presented at the Arthroscopy Association of North America Annual Meeting Over 10 Years (2006-2015). , 2016, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[2]  N. Simunovic,et al.  Level of clinical evidence presented at the International Society for Hip Arthroscopy Annual Scientific Meeting over 5 years (2010–2014) , 2015, Journal of hip preservation surgery.

[3]  W. Pannell,et al.  Trends in the surgical treatment of lumbar spine disease in the United States. , 2015, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[4]  M. Bhandari,et al.  Design and execution of clinical trials in orthopaedic surgery , 2014, Bone & joint research.

[5]  C. Maulucci,et al.  Research in spinal surgery: Evaluation and practice of evidence-based medicine. , 2014, World journal of orthopedics.

[6]  S. Cro,et al.  Level of evidence of clinical spinal research and its correlation with journal impact factor. , 2013, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[7]  Brian P. Cunningham,et al.  Have Levels of Evidence Improved the Quality of Orthopaedic Research? , 2013, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  Gwo-Chin Lee,et al.  Level of evidence: does it change the rate of publication and time to publication of American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons presentations? , 2013, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  Gwo-Chin Lee,et al.  Level of evidence of presentations at American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons annual meetings. , 2012, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  Rod J. Rohrich,et al.  The Levels of Evidence and Their Role in Evidence-Based Medicine , 2011, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[11]  Marc F Swiontkowski,et al.  Introducing levels of evidence to the journal , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  K. Mulpuri,et al.  Levels of Evidence at the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America Annual Meetings , 2010, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[13]  G. Berlet,et al.  Understanding Levels of Evidence for Scientific Communication , 2010, Foot & ankle specialist.

[14]  C. Turkelson,et al.  Levels of evidence at the AAOS meeting: can authors rate their own submissions, and do other raters agree? , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  B. Levy,et al.  Levels of Evidence , 2008, BJU international.

[16]  James N Weinstein,et al.  United States’ Trends and Regional Variations in Lumbar Spine Surgery: 1992–2003 , 2006, Spine.

[17]  M. Bhandari,et al.  Level of evidence in orthopaedic journals. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  K. Schulz,et al.  Bias and causal associations in observational research , 2002, The Lancet.

[19]  Level of Clinical Evidence , 2016 .

[20]  J. Shaw,et al.  Level of evidence trends in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1980-2010. , 2014, The Iowa orthopaedic journal.

[21]  David Evans,et al.  Hierarchy of evidence: a framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventions. , 2003, Journal of clinical nursing.