Calculating impacts of energy standards on energy demand in U.S. buildings with uncertainty in an integrated assessment model

In this paper, an IAM (integrated assessment model) uses a newly-developed Monte Carlo analysis capability to analyze the impacts of more aggressive U.S. residential and commercial building-energy codes and equipment standards on energy consumption and energy service costs at the state level, explicitly recognizing uncertainty in technology effectiveness and cost, socioeconomics, presence or absence of carbon prices, and climate impacts on energy demand. The paper finds that aggressive building-energy codes and equipment standards are an effective, cost-saving way to reduce energy consumption in buildings and greenhouse gas emissions in U.S. states. This conclusion is robust to significant uncertainties in population, economic activity, climate, carbon prices, and technology performance and costs.

[1]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[2]  B. Gerke,et al.  A retrospective investigation of energy efficiency standards: policies may have accelerated long term declines in appliance costs , 2014 .

[3]  E. Hanak,et al.  Climate policy at the local level: Insights from California , 2013 .

[4]  Adam Wynne,et al.  Components in the Pipeline , 2011, IEEE Software.

[5]  W. G. Strand,et al.  How Much More Global Warming and Sea Level Rise? , 2005, Science.

[6]  L. Clarke,et al.  Climate Policy and the Long-Term Evolution of the U.S. Buildings Sector , 2007 .

[7]  D. McCollum,et al.  Probabilistic cost estimates for climate change mitigation , 2013, Nature.

[8]  Wenji Zhou,et al.  How policy choice affects investment in low-carbon technology: The case of CO2 capture in indirect coal liquefaction in China , 2014 .

[9]  Socrates Kypreos,et al.  The Economics of Low Stabilization: Model Comparison of Mitigation Strategies and Costs , 2010 .

[10]  Christopher M. Jones,et al.  Deep carbon reductions in California require electrification and integration across economic sectors , 2013 .

[11]  R. Loulou,et al.  Climate mitigation under an uncertain technology future: A TIAM-World analysis , 2012 .

[12]  Bruce Tonn,et al.  State-Level Benefits of Energy Efficiency , 2007 .

[13]  W. Collins,et al.  Global climate projections , 2007 .

[14]  Son H. Kim,et al.  China's building energy demand: Long-term implications from a detailed assessment , 2012 .

[15]  Ian Gorton,et al.  Velo: A Knowledge-Management Framework for Modeling and Simulation , 2012, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[16]  S. Klein,et al.  GFDL's CM2 Global Coupled Climate Models. Part I: Formulation and Simulation Characteristics , 2006 .

[17]  Bishwa S. Koirala,et al.  Estimating the net implicit price of energy efficient building codes on U.S. households , 2014 .

[18]  Jiyong Eom,et al.  Evaluating sub-national building-energy efficiency policy options under uncertainty: Efficient sensitivity testing of alternative climate, technological, and socioeconomic futures in a regional integrated-assessment model , 2014 .

[19]  L. Clarke,et al.  Assessing Transformation Pathways , 2014 .

[20]  Elizabeth L. Malone,et al.  Incorporating stakeholder decision support needs into an integrated regional Earth system model , 2012, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[21]  F. Gracceva,et al.  Exploring the uncertainty around potential shale gas development – A global energy system analysis based on TIAM (TIMES Integrated Assessment Model) , 2013 .

[22]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[23]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  Analyzing price and efficiency dynamics of large appliances with the experience curve approach , 2010 .

[24]  Haewon C. McJeon,et al.  Trapped between two tails: trading off scientific uncertainties via climate targets , 2013 .

[25]  Jordan Macknick,et al.  The power of efficiency: Optimizing environmental and social benefits through demand-side-management , 2014 .

[26]  John P. Weyant,et al.  Comparison of integrated assessment models: Carbon price impacts on U.S. energy , 2015 .

[27]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  Analysis of climate policy targets under uncertainty , 2012, Climatic Change.

[28]  The Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative: Emission Leakage and the Effectiveness of Interstate Border Adjustments , 2009 .

[29]  Edeltraud Guenther,et al.  THE ECONOMICS OF MITIGATING CLIMATE CHANGE: WHAT CAN WE KNOW? , 2015, Tạp chí Nghiên cứu dân tộc.

[30]  Daiju Narita,et al.  Uncertainty in Integrated Assessment Models of Climate Change: Alternative Analytical Approaches , 2011, Environmental Modeling & Assessment.

[31]  Barbara Atkinson,et al.  A methodological framework for comparative assessments of equipment energy efficiency policy measures , 2012, Energy Efficiency.

[32]  M. Dettinger,et al.  Downscaling With Constructed Analogues: Daily Precipitation and Temperature Fields Over The United States , 2008 .

[33]  John E. Hathaway,et al.  Calculating Impacts of Energy Standards on Energy Demand in U.S. Buildings under Uncertainty with an Integrated Assessment Model: Technical Background Data , 2014 .

[34]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Climate change 2014 : mitigation of climate change , 2014 .

[35]  Niven Winchester,et al.  Leackage from Sub-national Climate Initiatives: The Case of California , 2012 .

[36]  P. Kyle,et al.  Modeling the effect of climate change on U.S. state-level buildings energy demands in an integrated assessment framework , 2014 .

[37]  Sonja Peterson Uncertainty and economic analysis of climate change: A survey of approaches and findings , 2006 .

[38]  Chunlian Jin,et al.  Investigating the nexus of climate, energy, water, and land at decision-relevant scales: the Platform for Regional Integrated Modeling and Analysis (PRIMA) , 2015, Climatic Change.

[39]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  Issues related to mitigation in the long-term context , 2007 .

[40]  A. Haurie,et al.  Modeling Uncertainty and the Economics of Climate Change: Recommendations for Robust Energy Policy , 2012, Environmental Modeling & Assessment.