Structural validation and cross-cultural robustness of the European Cyberbullying Intervention Project Questionnaire

Cyberbullying is a dynamic relationship between the aggressor and the victim.Establishing the prevalence of cyberbullying is difficult due to the instruments used.The instrument validated integrates the traditional bullying characteristics.Differences in prevalence of cyberbullying among countries using a single instrument. During the last decade, cyberbullying has become an increasing concern which has been addressed by diverse theoretical and methodological approaches. As a result there is a debate about its nature and rigorously validated assessment instruments have not yet been validated. In this context, in the present study an instrument composed of 22 items representing the different types of behaviours and actions that define cyberbullying has been structurally validated and its cross-cultural robustness has been calculated for the two main dimensions: cyber-victimization and cyber-aggression. To this end, 5679 secondary school students from six European countries (Spain, Germany, Italy, Poland, United Kingdom, and Greece) were surveyed through this self-report questionnaire which was designed based on previously existing instruments and the most relevant conceptual elements. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted and the global internal consistency was computed for the instrument and its two dimensions. Identical factor structures were found across all of the six subsamples. The results contribute to existing research by providing an instrument, the European Cyberbullying Intervention Project Questionnaire, which has been structurally validated in a wide sample from six different countries and that is useful to evaluate psycho-educative interventions against cyberbullying.

[1]  Pere J. Ferrando,et al.  FACTOR: A computer program to fit the exploratory factor analysis model , 2006, Behavior research methods.

[2]  J. Otto,et al.  Cross-Cultural Comparisons of Nouns Associated With Jealousy and the Related Emotions of Envy, Anger, and Fear , 1993 .

[3]  Ersilia Menesini,et al.  The Measurement of Cyberbullying: Dimensional Structure and Relative Item Severity and Discrimination , 2011, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[4]  Evaggelia D. Dafouli,et al.  Adolescent online cyberbullying in Greece: the impact of parental online security practices, bonding, and online impulsiveness. , 2013, The Journal of school health.

[5]  D. Flora,et al.  An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. , 2004, Psychological methods.

[6]  D. Olweus.  School bullying: development and some important challenges. , 2013, Annual review of clinical psychology.

[7]  E. Menesini,et al.  Cyberbullying definition and measurement: Some critical considerations , 2009 .

[8]  Jennifer D. Shapka,et al.  Are Cyberbullies really bullies? An investigation of reactive and proactive online aggression , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[9]  W. Heirman,et al.  Assessing Concerns and Issues about the Mediation of Technology in Cyberbullying , 2008 .

[10]  Vangie A. Foshee,et al.  Correlations Higher Order Factor Structure Of A Self-Control Test : Evidence From Confirmatory Factor Analysis With , 2003 .

[11]  C. Spiel,et al.  Traditional Bullying and Cyberbullying Identification of Risk Groups for Adjustment Problems , 2009 .

[12]  M Arsène,et al.  Cyberbullying (ou cyber harcèlement) et psychopathologie de l’enfant et de l’adolescent : état actuel des connaissances , 2014 .

[13]  Ulf Olsson,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation of the polychoric correlation coefficient , 1979 .

[14]  Albert Satorra,et al.  A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis , 1999 .

[15]  Christina Salmivalli,et al.  Different forms of bullying and victimization: Bully-victims versus bullies and victims , 2013 .

[16]  D. Olweus.  Cyberbullying: An overrated phenomenon? , 2012 .

[17]  Urbano Lorenzo-Seva,et al.  A factor simplicity index , 2003 .

[18]  M. Eisner,et al.  Effectiveness of a Universal School-Based Social Competence Program: The Role of Child Characteristics and Economic Factors , 2012 .

[19]  C. Pornari,et al.  Peer and cyber aggression in secondary school students: the role of moral disengagement, hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectancies. , 2010, Aggressive behavior.

[20]  Robert S. Tokunaga,et al.  Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[21]  Peter K. Smith,et al.  Cyberbullying: another main type of bullying? , 2008, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[22]  Lyndal M. Bullock,et al.  Cyberbullying: a cross-cultural perspective , 2014 .

[23]  Barbara M. Byrne,et al.  Structural equation modeling with EQS : basic concepts, applications, and programming , 2000 .

[24]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[25]  Tomasz Drabowicz.  Digital Inequalities as Class Inequalities? A comparison of youth in advanced societies in-and outside Europe , 2012 .

[26]  E. Menesini,et al.  Cyberbullying: Labels, Behaviours and Definition in Three European Countries , 2010, Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling.

[27]  Michele L. Ybarra,et al.  National Trends in Exposure to and Experiences of Violence on the Internet Among Children , 2011, Pediatrics.

[28]  Jan Pfetsch,et al.  Ethical Media Competence as a Protective Factor Against Cyberbullying and Cybervictimization Among German School Students , 2014, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[29]  Conor Mc Guckin,et al.  Tackling cyberbullying: Review of empirical evidence regarding successful responses by students, parents and schools , 2012 .

[30]  Lourdes Villardón-Gallego,et al.  Cyberbullying in adolescents: Modalities and aggressors' profile , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[31]  J. Pyżalski.  From cyberbullying to electronic aggression: typology of the phenomenon , 2012 .

[32]  D. Cross,et al.  Cyberbullying Versus Face-to-Face Bullying A Theoretical and Conceptual Review , 2009 .

[33]  Julia Davidson,et al.  Cyber safety for adolescent girls: bullying, harassment, sexting, pornography, and solicitation , 2014, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.

[34]  David R. Williams,et al.  The Development and Validation of the Online Victimization Scale for Adolescents , 2010 .

[35]  Julian Dooley,et al.  Bullying in schools and in cyberspace: Associations with depressive symptoms in Swiss and Australian adolescents , 2010 .

[36]  Peter K. Smith.  The nature of school bullying : a cross-national perspective , 1999 .

[37]  Barbara M. Byrne,et al.  Cross-Cultural Comparisons and the Presumption of Equivalent Measurement and Theoretical Structure , 1999 .

[38]  Bitte Modin,et al.  Cyberbullying and subjective health : A large-scale study of students in Stockholm, Sweden , 2013 .

[39]  Jennifer D. Shapka,et al.  The changing face of bullying: An empirical comparison between traditional and internet bullying and victimization , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[40]  Conor Mc Guckin,et al.  f2f and cyberbullying among children in Northern Ireland: Data from the Kids Life and Times Surveys , 2017 .

[41]  A. G. Harbaugh,et al.  Bullying prevalence across contexts: a meta-analysis measuring cyber and traditional bullying. , 2014, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[42]  E. Konijn,et al.  Adolescents' media exposure may increase their cyberbullying behavior: a longitudinal study. , 2015, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[43]  Manuel Gámez-Guadix,et al.  Longitudinal and reciprocal relations of cyberbullying with depression, substance use, and problematic internet use among adolescents. , 2013, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[44]  Michele L. Ybarra,et al.  How Risky Are Social Networking Sites? A Comparison of Places Online Where Youth Sexual Solicitation and Harassment Occurs , 2008, Pediatrics.

[45]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  On the estimation of polychoric correlations and their asymptotic covariance matrix , 1994 .

[46]  F. Dehue.  Cyberbullying Research: New Perspectives and Alternative Methodologies. Introduction to the Special Issue , 2013 .

[47]  Heidi Vandebosch,et al.  Defining Cyberbullying: A Qualitative Research into the Perceptions of Youngsters , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[48]  Peter K. Smith,et al.  3. Definitions of bullying and cyberbullying: how useful are the terms? , 2013 .

[49]  F. Holgado-Tello,et al.  Construct Validity of Likert Scales through Confirmatory Factor Analysis: A Simulation Study Comparing Different Methods of Estimation Based on Pearson and Polychoric Correlations , 2013 .

[50]  Michael L. Sulkowski,et al.  Differences between Peer Victimization in Cyber and Physical Settings and Associated Psychosocial Adjustment in Early Adolescence , 2009 .

[51]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[52]  Robert Slonje,et al.  The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[53]  A. Stone,et al.  The science of self-report. Implications for research and practice , 1999 .

[54]  Russell A. Sabella,et al.  Cyberbullying myths and realities , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[55]  Niki Harré,et al.  Factors associated with young people's successful resolution of distressing electronic harassment , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[56]  Stephen G West,et al.  Evaluating model fit for growth curve models: Integration of fit indices from SEM and MLM frameworks. , 2009, Psychological methods.

[57]  José A. Casas,et al.  Bullying and cyberbullying: Convergent and divergent predictor variables , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[58]  F. Holgado-Tello,et al.  Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables , 2008 .

[59]  D. Cross,et al.  Bullying in school and cyberspace: Associations with depressive symptoms in Swiss and Australian adolescents , 2010, Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health.

[60]  Francisco Pablo Holgado Tello,et al.  Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables , 2010 .

[61]  Kristin M. Holland,et al.  A systematic review and content analysis of bullying and cyber-bullying measurement strategies. , 2014, Aggression and violent behavior.

[62]  D. Olweus,et al.  Bullying at school : what we know and what we can do / Dan Olweus , 1993 .

[63]  B. Byrne.  Book Review: Structural Equation Modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming , 1994 .

[64]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  Factor simplicity index and transformations , 1977 .

[65]  Elizabeth Levin,et al.  Cyberbullying: Eliciting harm without consequence , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[66]  C. Bolman,et al.  Coping with Cyberbullying: Differences Between Victims, Bully‐victims and Children not Involved in Bullying , 2013 .

[67]  D. Bandalos,et al.  Factors Influencing Cross-Validation of Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models. , 1993, Multivariate behavioral research.

[68]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[69]  M. Furlong,et al.  The Assessment of School Bullying , 2006 .

[70]  Ann Frisén,et al.  Cyberbullying assessment instruments: A systematic review , 2013 .