Initiation of chromosome replication in bacteria: analysis of an inhibitor control model

This article contains an analysis of a version of the well-known inhibitor-dilution model for the control of initiation of chromosome replication in bacteria. According to this model, an unstable inhibitor interacts with an initiation primer in a hit-and-destroy fashion to prevent successful initiation; both constituents are presumed to be RNA species that are synthesized constitutively. The model further postulates that the inhibitor interacts cooperatively with the primer, that the inhibitor gene is removed some distance from the origin of replication, and that an eclipse period exists during which the chromosome origin is not able to reinitiate. This unstable-inhibitor version is characterized by four parameters: the inhibitor half-life, the cooperativity index, the location of the inhibitor gene, and the eclipse period; computer simulations are used to study the effect of each of these on the DNA and interdivision time distributions in exponentially growing steady-state cultures. In neither case was any combination of parameter values found that could provide even moderately satisfactory agreement between the simulation results and experimental data. From the examples furnished and the associated discussion, it appears that there are none--that no combination of parameter values exists that can reasonably be expected to produce a significantly better fit than those tested. We conclude that the model in its present form cannot be a valid description of chromosome replication control in bacteria. It is pointed out that this does not necessarily apply to negative initiation control models in general, or even to all inhibitor-dilution systems, merely to the particular ColE1-like mechanism considered here. Nevertheless, recent experimental results, which can only be understood in terms of a very high degree of initiation synchrony within individual cells, offer strong evidence against stochastic models of this kind for the control of chromosome replication.

[1]  K. von Meyenburg,et al.  Messenger Ribonucleic Acid Synthesis and Degradation in Escherichia coli During Inhibition of Translation , 1973, Journal of bacteriology.

[2]  H. Margalit,et al.  Initiation of DNA replication in bacteria: analysis of an autorepressor control model. , 1984, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  G. Cesareni,et al.  Interaction between RNA1 and the primer precursor in the regulation of Co1E1 replication. , 1983, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  O. Maaløe,et al.  Autorepressor model for control of DNA replication. , 1973, Nature: New biology.

[5]  J. D. Harvey Parameters of the generation time distribution of Escherichia coli B-r. , 1972, Journal of general microbiology.

[6]  H. Steen Further developments of a microscope-based flow cytometer: light scatter detection and excitation intensity compensation. , 1980, Cytometry.

[7]  A. Zaritsky,et al.  Rate stimulation of deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis after inhibition , 1975, Journal of bacteriology.

[8]  H. E. Kubitschek,et al.  Chromosome Replication andtheDivision Cycle ofEscherichia coli B/r , 1971 .

[9]  W. Donachie,et al.  Relationship between Cell Size and Time of Initiation of DNA Replication , 1968, Nature.

[10]  G. Churchward,et al.  Growth rate-dependent control of chromosome replication initiation in Escherichia coli , 1981, Journal of bacteriology.

[11]  S. Molin,et al.  Control of replication of bacterial plasmids: genetics, molecular biology, and physiology of the plasmid R1 system. , 1984, Plasmid.

[12]  L. Plank,et al.  Generation time statistics of Escherichia coli B measured by synchronous culture techniques. , 1979, Journal of general microbiology.

[13]  H. Steen,et al.  Characteristics of a simple, high-resolution flow cytometer based o a new flow configuration. , 1979, Biophysical journal.

[14]  J. D. Harvey Synchronous growth of cells and the generation time distribution. , 1972, Journal of general microbiology.

[15]  L. Koppes,et al.  Positive correlation between size at initiation of chromosome replication in Escherichia coli and size at initiation of cell constriction , 1980, Journal of bacteriology.

[16]  W. Messer,et al.  Effect of dam methylation on the activity of the E. coli replication origin, oriC. , 1985, The EMBO journal.

[17]  Regulation of plasmid replication. , 1984, Microbiological reviews.

[18]  B. Polisky,et al.  Analysis of a recessive plasmid copy number mutant: evidence for negative control of col E1 replication , 1979, Cell.

[19]  H. Steen,et al.  Flow cytometry of bacteria: a promising tool in experimental and clinical microbiology. , 1983, Journal of general microbiology.

[20]  G. Churchward,et al.  Macromolecular composition of bacteria. , 1982, Journal of theoretical biology.

[21]  R. H. Pritchard Control of DNA Replication in Bacteria , 1978 .

[22]  C. Woldringh,et al.  Surface growth in rod-shaped bacteria. , 1978, Journal of theoretical biology.

[23]  H. Steen,et al.  Timing of initiation of chromosome replication in individual Escherichia coli cells. , 1986, The EMBO journal.

[24]  K. Nordström,et al.  Insertion of an R1 plasmid into the origin of replication of the E. coli chromosome: Random timing of replication of the hybrid chromosome , 1986, Cell.

[25]  C. Woldringh,et al.  Changes in cell diameter during the division cycle of Escherichia coli , 1980, Journal of bacteriology.

[26]  E. Ron,et al.  Control of cell division in Escherichia coli: effect of amino acid starvation , 1977, Journal of bacteriology.

[27]  T. Hashimoto-Gotoh,et al.  ColE1 plasmid incompatibility: localization and analysis of mutations affecting incompatibility , 1979, Journal of bacteriology.

[28]  H. E. Kubitschek,et al.  Chromosome Replication and the Division Cycle of Escherichia coli B/r , 1971, Journal of bacteriology.

[29]  S. Cooper,et al.  On the bacterial life sequence. , 1968, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.