Non-Fourier Information in Bandpass Noise Patterns

Random dot patterns and white-noise luminance textures are widely used in psychophysical experiments to study low-level visual processes. Because these noise patterns are broadband, bandpass filtered versions are employed to limit their frequency content. It is not recognized, however, that bandpass noise patterns have amplitude-modulation (AM) components. The AM signal is not present in the Fourier spectrum, nonetheless, it is a valid signal for second-order mechanisms. We characterize the properties of the AM signal in bandpass noise textures: the relevant periodicities of the AM signal are always much lower than the actual passband; the upper frequency limit of the AM signal increases with the linear bandwidth. We present psychophysical data to demonstrate the perceptual significance of the AM signal in bandpass noise. We provide a method for obtaining AM-free bandpass patterns, and compare psychophysical performance in experiments employing AM-present and AM-free bandpass noise patterns as stereoscopic stimuli. The results show that the AM component contributes to stereoscopic discrimination performance at large disparities. We suggest that the low-frequency AM signal is a possible confounding factor in experiments employing bandpass noise textures, and that linear filtering can isolate spatial scales effectively only for linear systems.

[1]  Laurie M. Wilcox,et al.  Is the site of non-linear filtering in stereopsis before or after binocular combination? , 1996, Vision Research.

[2]  B. Julesz,et al.  Maturational Windows And Adult Cortical Plasticity , 1995 .

[3]  D. Broadbent,et al.  Some experiments bearing on the hypothesis that the visual system analyses spatial patterns in independent bands of spatial frequency , 1975, Vision Research.

[4]  G. Sperling,et al.  Drift-balanced random stimuli: a general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[5]  J. Mayhew,et al.  Convergent disparity discriminations in narrow-band-filtered random-dot stereograms , 1979, Vision Research.

[6]  G. Sperling,et al.  The functional architecture of human visual motion perception , 1995, Vision Research.

[7]  J G Daugman,et al.  Demodulation, predictive coding, and spatial vision. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[8]  J. Nachmias,et al.  Masking by spatially-modulated gratings , 1983, Vision Research.

[9]  A. Seebeck,et al.  Beobachtungen über einige Bedingungen der Entstehung von Tönen , 1841 .

[10]  B. Julesz.  Foundations of Cyclopean Perception , 1971 .

[11]  Keith Langley,et al.  Computational analysis of non-Fourier motion , 1994, Vision Research.

[12]  L. Glass.  Moiré Effect from Random Dots , 1969, Nature.

[13]  B. Julesz.  Binocular depth perception of computer-generated patterns , 1960 .

[14]  S. Nishida,et al.  Positive motion after-effect induced by bandpass-filtered random-dot kinematograms , 1992, Vision Research.

[15]  H. Smallman,et al.  Size-disparity correlation in stereopsis at contrast threshold. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[16]  C. Schor,et al.  Binocular sensory fusion is limited by spatial resolution , 1984, Vision Research.

[17]  C. Schor,et al.  Disparity range for local stereopsis as a function of luminance spatial frequency , 1983, Vision Research.

[18]  G. J. Burton,et al.  Evidence for non-linear response processes in the human visual system from measurements on the thresholds of spatial beat frequencies. , 1973, Vision research.

[19]  S. Klein,et al.  Evidence against narrow-band spatial frequency channels in human vision: the detectability of frequency modulated gratings , 1975, Vision Research.

[20]  David R. Badcock,et al.  Detection of spatial beats: Non-linearity or contrast increment detection? , 1986, Vision Research.

[21]  R D Freeman,et al.  Neuronal Mechanisms Underlying Stereopsis: How Do Simple Cells in the Visual Cortex Encode Binocular Disparity? , 1995, Perception.

[22]  R. Hess,et al.  D max for stereopsis depends on size, not spatial frequency content , 1995, Vision Research.

[23]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Stereoscopic depth discrimination in the visual cortex: neurons ideally suited as disparity detectors. , 1990, Science.

[24]  D. Burr,et al.  Feature detection in human vision: a phase-dependent energy model , 1988, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.