Influence of the metaphysis positioning in a new reverse shoulder prosthesis

Aim of this work is to investigate the behaviour of a new reverse shoulder prosthesis, characterized by a humeral metaphysis with a variable offset, designed to increase the range of movements and to reduce the impingement. In particular, by means of virtual prototypes of the prosthesis, different offset values of the humeral metaphysis have been analysed in order to find the best positioning able to maximize the range of movements of the shoulder joint. The abduction force of the deltoid, at different offset values, has been also estimated. The study has been organized as follows. In the first step, the point clouds of the surfaces of the different components of the prosthesis have been acquired by a 3D scanner. This kind of scanner allows to convert camera images into three-dimensional models by analysing the moire fringes. In the second step, the acquired point clouds have been post-processed and converted into CAD models. In the third step, all the 3D reconstructed models have been imported and assembled through a CAD system. After, a collision analysis has been performed to detect the maximum angular positions of the arm at different metaphysis offset values. In the last step, FEM models of shoulder joint with the new prosthesis have been created. Different analyses have been performed to estimate how the deltoid abduction force varies depending on the offset of the humeral tray. The study allowed to understand how the offset of the metaphysis affects the performances of the shoulder. The obtained results can be effectively used to give surgeons useful guidelines for the installation of these kinds of implants.

[1]  A. Pasta,et al.  Experimental and numerical analysis of aluminum-aluminum bolted joints subject to an indentation process , 2015 .

[2]  Tommaso Ingrassia,et al.  A comparison of simplex and simulated annealing for optimization of a new rear underrun protective device , 2013, Engineering with Computers.

[3]  Jonathan C. Levy,et al.  Center of Rotation Affects Abduction Range of Motion of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  James A. Johnson,et al.  Implant Design Variations in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Influence the Required Deltoid Force and Resultant Joint Load , 2015, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  Davide Tumino,et al.  Numerical study of the components positioning influence on the stability of a reverse shoulder prosthesis , 2012 .

[6]  Tommaso Ingrassia,et al.  DESIGN OPTIMIZATION AND ANALYSIS OF A NEW REAR UNDERRUN PROTECTIVE DEVICE FOR TRUCK , 2010 .

[7]  Thomas W Wright,et al.  How do deltoid muscle moment arms change after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty? , 2016, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[8]  J. Levy,et al.  Arc of motion and socket depth in reverse shoulder implants. , 2009, Clinical biomechanics.

[9]  Donatella Cerniglia,et al.  Detection of Disbonds in Multi-layer Structures by Laser-Based Ultrasonic Technique , 2008 .

[10]  Christian Gerber,et al.  Predictors of scapular notching in patients managed with the Delta III reverse total shoulder replacement. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  T. Ingrassia,et al.  Optimal positioning of the humeral component in the reverse shoulder prosthesis , 2014, MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY.

[12]  Darryl D D'Lima,et al.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty component center of rotation affects muscle function. , 2014, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[13]  P. Grammont,et al.  Delta shoulder prosthesis for rotator cuff rupture. , 1993, Orthopedics.

[14]  Davide Tumino,et al.  Contact between the components of a knee prosthesis: Numerical and experimental study [Contatto tra i componenti di una protesi di ginocchio: Studio numerico e sperimentale] , 2012 .

[15]  Giuseppe Vincenzo Marannano,et al.  Structural optimization and experimental analysis of composite material panels for naval use , 2008 .

[16]  F A Matsen,et al.  Glenoid loosening in total shoulder arthroplasty. Association with rotator cuff deficiency. , 1988, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[17]  Nigrelli,et al.  Methodical Redesign Of A Semitrailer , 2005 .

[18]  Davide Tumino,et al.  A multi-technique simultaneous approach for the design of a sailing yacht , 2017 .

[19]  Brian T Feeley,et al.  Biomechanics of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. , 2015, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[20]  Kent N Bachus,et al.  Effect of deltoid tension and humeral version in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical study. , 2012, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[21]  Jonathan C. Levy,et al.  Evaluation of abduction range of motion and avoidance of inferior scapular impingement in a reverse shoulder model. , 2008, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[22]  E Pennestrì,et al.  Virtual musculo-skeletal model for the biomechanical analysis of the upper limb. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  Mumin Song,et al.  Overview of three-dimensional shape measurement using optical methods , 2000 .