Open and reproducible science practices in psychoneuroendocrinology: Opportunities to foster scientific progress

[1]  K. Roelofs,et al.  The STRESS-NL database: A resource for human acute stress studies across the Netherlands , 2022, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[2]  Jade S. Pickering,et al.  A community-sourced glossary of open scholarship terms , 2022, Nature Human Behaviour.

[3]  Max Kozlov.  NIH issues a seismic mandate: share data publicly , 2022, Nature.

[4]  E. Henderson.  A guide to preregistration and Registered Reports , 2022 .

[5]  Christian Merz,et al.  Fachgruppe Biologische Psychologie und Neuropsychologie. Mehr als nur fragwürdig: Reproduzierbarkeit und Open Science in der Lehre aus Sicht der Biologischen Psychologie und Neuropsychologie , 2022, Psychologische Rundschau.

[6]  S. Lupien,et al.  The Cortisol Assessment List (CoAL) A tool to systematically document and evaluate cortisol assessment in blood, urine and saliva , 2021, Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology.

[7]  D. Quintana.  Towards better hypothesis tests in oxytocin research: Evaluating the validity of auxiliary assumptions , 2021, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[8]  Matthew K. Lau,et al.  A large-scale study on research code quality and execution , 2021, Scientific Data.

[9]  C. Chambers,et al.  The past, present and future of Registered Reports , 2021, Nature Human Behaviour.

[10]  Dustin A. Fife,et al.  Understanding the exploratory/confirmatory data analysis continuum: Moving beyond the "replication crisis". , 2021, The American psychologist.

[11]  J. Logg,et al.  Pre-registration: Weighing costs and benefits for researchers , 2021 .

[12]  Michèle B. Nuijten,et al.  Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science. , 2021, Annual review of psychology.

[13]  J. Pruessner,et al.  Effects of psychological, sensory, and metabolic energy prime manipulation on the acute endocrine stress response in fasted women , 2021, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[14]  Rob Hudson,et al.  Explicating Exact versus Conceptual Replication , 2021, Erkenntnis.

[15]  A. R. Otto,et al.  Acute Psychosocial Stress Increases Cognitive-Effort Avoidance , 2021, Psychological science.

[16]  Timothy M. Errington,et al.  Initial evidence of research quality of registered reports compared with the standard publishing model , 2021, Nature Human Behaviour.

[17]  M. Higgs,et al.  Research on registered report research. , 2021, Nature human behaviour.

[18]  S. Lupien,et al.  Staying informed without a cost: No effect of positive news media on stress reactivity, memory and affect in young adults , 2021, PloS one.

[19]  Manuel Kuhn,et al.  Navigating the manifold of skin conductance response quantification approaches , 2021 .

[20]  P. Sachdev,et al.  The need for a reliable oxytocin assay , 2021, Molecular Psychiatry.

[21]  A. Keil,et al.  Open science in psychophysiology: An overview of challenges and emerging solutions. , 2021, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[22]  R. Ebstein,et al.  Intranasal oxytocin in the treatment of autism spectrum disorders: A multilevel meta-analysis , 2021, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[23]  M. Del Giudice,et al.  A Traveler’s Guide to the Multiverse: Promises, Pitfalls, and a Framework for the Evaluation of Analytic Decisions , 2021, Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science.

[24]  G. Domes,et al.  Effects of glucose intake on stress reactivity in young, healthy men , 2020, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[25]  J. Pruessner,et al.  The impact of maternal care and blood glucose availability on the cortisol stress response in fasted women , 2020, Journal of Neural Transmission.

[26]  Bethany Lassetter,et al.  Testosterone fluctuations in response to a democratic election predict partisan attitudes toward the elected leader , 2020, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[27]  Jordan C. Barone,et al.  How to study the menstrual cycle: Practical tools and recommendations , 2020, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[28]  Reinder Vos de Wael,et al.  Association between hippocampal structure and serum Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) in healthy adults: A registered report , 2019, NeuroImage.

[29]  Soric.  Replicability , 2021, Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology.

[30]  Pranjal H. Mehta,et al.  Estimating the Associations between Big Five Personality Traits, Testosterone, and Cortisol , 2020, Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology.

[31]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  Pre‐registration: Why and How , 2020, Journal of Consumer Psychology.

[32]  Cooper A. Smout,et al.  Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic , 2020, bioRxiv.

[33]  A. Holcombe,et al.  Where Are the Self-Correcting Mechanisms in Science? , 2020, Review of General Psychology.

[34]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  Specification curve analysis , 2020, Nature Human Behaviour.

[35]  Jenna A. Harder,et al.  The Multiverse of Methods: Extending the Multiverse Analysis to Address Data-Collection Decisions , 2020, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[36]  M. Gollwitzer.  DFG Priority Program SPP 2317 Proposal: A meta-scientific program to analyze and optimize replicability in the behavioral, social, and cognitive sciences (META-REP) , 2020 .

[37]  Michèle B. Nuijten,et al.  “statcheck”: Automatically detect statistical reporting inconsistencies to increase reproducibility of meta‐analyses , 2020, Research synthesis methods.

[38]  Daniel S Quintana,et al.  A synthetic dataset primer for the biobehavioural sciences to promote reproducibility and hypothesis generation , 2020, eLife.

[39]  U. Dirnagl.  Preregistration of exploratory research: Learning from the golden age of discovery , 2020, PLoS biology.

[40]  C. Chambers,et al.  The past, present and future of Registered Reports , 2020, Nature Human Behaviour.

[41]  Anne M. Scheel,et al.  An Excess of Positive Results: Comparing the Standard Psychology Literature With Registered Reports , 2020, Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science.

[42]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Ensuring the quality and specificity of preregistrations , 2018, PLoS biology.

[43]  D. Mehler,et al.  Correction: Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond , 2019, PLoS biology.

[44]  Bradley C. Love,et al.  Variability in the analysis of a single neuroimaging dataset by many teams , 2019, Nature.

[45]  Jan Richter,et al.  Navigating the garden of forking paths for data exclusions in fear conditioning research , 2019, eLife.

[46]  Jason M. Scimeca,et al.  Practical Considerations for Navigating Registered Reports , 2019, Trends in Neurosciences.

[47]  Matthew D. Lieberman,et al.  Null results of oxytocin and vasopressin administration across a range of social cognitive and behavioral paradigms: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial , 2019, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[48]  Stuart J. Ritchie,et al.  Preregistration of secondary data analysis: A template and tutorial , 2019, Meta-Psychology.

[49]  M. Fullana,et al.  Fear Extinction Retention: Is It What We Think It Is? , 2019, Biological Psychiatry.

[50]  Deborah E. Rupp,et al.  Answers to 18 Questions About Open Science Practices , 2019 .

[51]  Nicholas A. Coles,et al.  Analysis of Open Data and Computational Reproducibility in Registered Reports in Psychology , 2019, Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science.

[52]  Gabriel Popkin,et al.  Data sharing and how it can benefit your scientific career , 2019, Nature.

[53]  Amanda Kvarven,et al.  Comparing Meta-Analyses and Pre-Registered Multiple Labs Replication Projects , 2019 .

[54]  Herman Aguinis,et al.  HARKing: How Badly Can Cherry-Picking and Question Trolling Produce Bias in Published Results? , 2019 .

[55]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  The Costs of Reproducibility , 2019, Neuron.

[56]  Mathew H. Evans,et al.  Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results , 2018, Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science.

[57]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  A practical guide for transparency in psychological science , 2018 .

[58]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  The preregistration revolution , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[59]  Lei Feng,et al.  Systematic review and meta‐analysis of reported adverse events of long‐term intranasal oxytocin treatment for autism spectrum disorder , 2018, Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[60]  Michelle N. Meyer,et al.  Practical Tips for Ethical Data Sharing , 2018 .

[61]  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers,et al.  Data Sharing in Psychology: A Survey on Barriers and Preconditions , 2018 .

[62]  K. Adolph,et al.  Practical Solutions for Sharing Data and Materials From Psychological Research , 2018, Advances in methods and practices in psychological science.

[63]  Mark Rubin,et al.  When Does HARKing Hurt? Identifying When Different Types of Undisclosed Post Hoc Hypothesizing Harm Scientific Progress , 2017 .

[64]  S. Segerstrom,et al.  Psychosocial functioning and the cortisol awakening response: Meta-analysis, P-curve analysis, and evaluation of the evidential value in existing studies , 2017, Biological Psychology.

[65]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Evaluating Registered Reports: A Naturalistic Comparative Study of Article Impact , 2017 .

[66]  James A. J. Heathers,et al.  The GRIM Test , 2017 .

[67]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Making sense of replications , 2017, eLife.

[68]  John P. A. Ioannidis,et al.  A manifesto for reproducible science , 2017, Nature Human Behaviour.

[69]  Eric Dutilh.  Seven Selfish Reasons for Preregistration , 2016 .

[70]  Gillian M. Raab,et al.  synthpop: Bespoke Creation of Synthetic Data in R , 2016 .

[71]  Francis Tuerlinckx,et al.  Increasing Transparency Through a Multiverse Analysis , 2016, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[72]  Susan Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Why Preregistration Makes Me Nervous , 2016 .

[73]  M. Munafo,et al.  Null is beautiful: On the importance of publishing null results , 2016, Journal of psychopharmacology.

[74]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments , 2016, Scientific Data.

[75]  Richard McElreath,et al.  The natural selection of bad science , 2016, Royal Society Open Science.

[76]  S. Goodman,et al.  Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations , 2016, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[77]  G. Nave,et al.  Is there a Publication Bias in Behavioural Intranasal Oxytocin Research on Humans? Opening the File Drawer of One Laboratory , 2016, Journal of neuroendocrinology.

[78]  Erik Schultes,et al.  The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship , 2016, Scientific Data.

[79]  E. Adam,et al.  Assessment of the cortisol awakening response: Expert consensus guidelines , 2016, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[80]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Does Oxytocin Increase Trust in Humans? A Critical Review of Research , 2015, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[81]  Wilhelm Gaus,et al.  Interpretation of Statistical Significance - Exploratory Versus Confirmative Testing in Clinical Trials, Epidemiological Studies, Meta-Analyses and Toxicological Screening (Using Ginkgo biloba as an Example) , 2015 .

[82]  I. Cockburn,et al.  The Economics of Reproducibility in Preclinical Research , 2015, PLoS biology.

[83]  R. Lanfear,et al.  The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science , 2015, PLoS biology.

[84]  Andrew H. Miller,et al.  The role of inflammation in depression: from evolutionary imperative to modern treatment target , 2015, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[85]  Adam R Ferguson,et al.  Big data from small data: data-sharing in the 'long tail' of neuroscience , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[86]  Neil Malhotra,et al.  Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer , 2014, Science.

[87]  J. Brian,et al.  Intranasal oxytocin in the treatment of autism spectrum disorders: A review of literature and early safety and efficacy data in youth , 2014, Brain Research.

[88]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  P-Curve and Effect Size: Correcting for Publication Bias Using Only Significant Results , 2014 .

[89]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  p-Curve and Effect Size , 2014, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[90]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Registered Reports A Method to Increase the Credibility of Published Results , 2014 .

[91]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  P-Curve: A Key to the File Drawer , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[92]  A. El-Menyar,et al.  Registration of Clinical Trials: Is it Really Needed? , 2013, North American journal of medical sciences.

[93]  F. Plessow,et al.  Classification Criteria for Distinguishing Cortisol Responders From Nonresponders to Psychosocial Stress: Evaluation of Salivary Cortisol Pulse Detection in Panel Designs , 2013, Psychosomatic medicine.

[94]  F. Plessow,et al.  Transformation techniques for cross-sectional and longitudinal endocrine data: Application to salivary cortisol concentrations , 2013, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[95]  C. Chambers.  Registered Reports: A new publishing initiative at Cortex , 2013, Cortex.

[96]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Scientific Utopia , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[97]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling , 2012, Psychological science.

[98]  O. Wolkowitz,et al.  Maintenance of a positive outlook during acute stress protects against pro-inflammatory reactivity and future depressive symptoms , 2012, Brain, Behavior, and Immunity.

[99]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  False-Positive Psychology , 2011, Psychological science.

[100]  Daniele Fanelli,et al.  Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries , 2011, Scientometrics.

[101]  R. Brand,et al.  Testing for the presence of positive-outcome bias in peer review: a randomized controlled trial. , 2010, Archives of internal medicine.

[102]  E. Maywood,et al.  Circadian clocks: regulators of endocrine and metabolic rhythms. , 2007, The Journal of endocrinology.

[103]  Markus Schwaninger,et al.  A mechanism converting psychosocial stress into mononuclear cell activation , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[104]  D. Rennie.  CONSORT revised--improving the reporting of randomized trials. , 2001, JAMA.

[105]  Gerry White,et al.  The Past , 2000 .

[106]  N. Kerr.  HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known , 1998, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[107]  C. Kirschbaum,et al.  The 'Trier Social Stress Test'--a tool for investigating psychobiological stress responses in a laboratory setting. , 1993, Neuropsychobiology.

[108]  R. Rosenthal.  The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results , 1979 .

[109]  K. Pearson,et al.  Statistical Tests , 1935, Nature.