A two‐phase sampling design for increasing detections of rare species in occupancy surveys

Summary 1. Occupancy estimation is a commonly used tool in ecological studies owing to the ease at which data can be collected and the large spatial extent that can be covered. One major obstacle to using an occupancy-based approach is the complications associated with designing and implementing an efficient survey. These logistical challenges become magnified when working with rare species when effort can be wasted in areas with none or very few individuals. 2. Here, we develop a two-phase sampling approach that mitigates these problems by using a design that places more effort in areas with higher predicted probability of occurrence. We compare our new sampling design to traditional single-season occupancy estimation under a range of conditions and population characteristics. We develop an intuitive measure of predictive error to compare the two approaches and use simulations to assess the relative accuracy of each approach. 3. Our two-phase approach exhibited lower predictive error rates compared to the traditional single-season approach in highly spatially correlated environments. The difference was greatest when detection probability was high (0·75) regardless of the habitat or sample size. When the true occupancy rate was below 0·4 (0·05–0·4), we found that allocating 25% of the sample to the first phase resulted in the lowest error rates. 4. In the majority of scenarios, the two-phase approach showed lower error rates compared to the traditional single-season approach suggesting our new approach is fairly robust to a broad range of conditions and design factors and merits use under a wide variety of settings. 5. Synthesis and applications. Conservation and management of rare species are a challenging task facing natural resource managers. It is critical for studies involving rare species to efficiently allocate effort and resources as they are usually of a finite nature. We believe our approach provides a framework for optimal allocation of effort while maximizing the information content of the data in an attempt to provide the highest conservation value per unit of effort.

[1]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  A Bayesian state-space formulation of dynamic occupancy models. , 2007, Ecology.

[2]  A. Peterson,et al.  Predicting distributions of known and unknown reptile species in Madagascar , 2003, Nature.

[3]  J Andrew Royle,et al.  Modeling the effects of environmental disturbance on wildlife communities: avian responses to prescribed fire. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[4]  J. Kershner,et al.  Propagule pressure and stream characteristics influence introgression: cutthroat and rainbow trout in British Columbia. , 2010, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[5]  Fred A. Johnson,et al.  BAYESIAN INFERENCE AND DECISION THEORY—A FRAMEWORK FOR DECISION MAKING IN NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT , 2003 .

[6]  I. MacKenzie Occupancy estimation and modeling , 2013 .

[7]  H. P. Possingham,et al.  State-Dependent Decision Analysis for Conservation Biology , 1997 .

[8]  W. Thompson Sampling rare or elusive species : concepts, designs, and techniques for estimating population parameters , 2004 .

[9]  J. Nichols,et al.  IMPROVING INFERENCES IN POPULATION STUDIES OF RARE SPECIES THAT ARE DETECTED IMPERFECTLY , 2005 .

[10]  Hugh P Possingham,et al.  Zero tolerance ecology: improving ecological inference by modelling the source of zero observations. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[11]  Cindy E. Hauser,et al.  Active adaptive conservation of threatened species in the face of uncertainty. , 2010, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[12]  Göran Englund,et al.  Network connectivity and dispersal barriers: Using geographical information system (GIS) tools to predict landscape scale distribution of a key predator (Esox lucius) among lakes , 2007 .

[13]  Adrian Baddeley,et al.  spatstat: An R Package for Analyzing Spatial Point Patterns , 2005 .

[14]  SCOTT A. FIELD,et al.  OPTIMIZING ALLOCATION OF MONITORING EFFORT UNDER ECONOMIC AND OBSERVATIONAL CONSTRAINTS , 2005 .

[15]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Inference About Species Richness and Community Structure Using Species-Specific Occupancy Models in the National Swiss Breeding Bird Survey MHB , 2009 .

[16]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Species richness and occupancy estimation in communities subject to temporary emigration. , 2009, Ecology.

[17]  Byron J. T. Morgan,et al.  Design of occupancy studies with imperfect detection , 2010 .

[18]  James D. Nichols,et al.  Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time , 2001 .

[19]  J. Nichols,et al.  ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY, COLONIZATION, AND LOCAL EXTINCTION WHEN A SPECIES IS DETECTED IMPERFECTLY , 2003 .

[20]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Estimating Size and Composition of Biological Communities by Modeling the Occurrence of Species , 2005 .

[21]  Scott A. Sisson,et al.  Statistical Inference and Simulation for Spatial Point Processes , 2005 .

[22]  James D. Nichols,et al.  Conservation in the face of climate change: The roles of alternative models, monitoring, and adaptation in confronting and reducing uncertainty , 2011 .

[23]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Estimating species richness and accumulation by modeling species occurrence and detectability. , 2006, Ecology.

[24]  Darryl I MacKenzie,et al.  Sampling design trade-offs in occupancy studies with imperfect detection: examples and software. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[25]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Impacts of forest fragmentation on species richness: a hierarchical approach to community modelling , 2009 .

[26]  Darryl I. MacKenzie,et al.  Designing occupancy studies: general advice and allocating survey effort , 2005 .

[27]  M. Conroy,et al.  Analysis and Management of Animal Populations , 2002 .

[28]  James E. Hines,et al.  Identification and synthetic modeling of factors affecting American black duck populations , 2002 .

[29]  James F. Saracco,et al.  Occupancy modeling of Black‐backed Woodpeckers on burned Sierra Nevada forests , 2011 .

[30]  J. Rotenberry,et al.  GIS-based niche modeling for mapping species' habitat. , 2006, Ecology.

[31]  Michael C Runge,et al.  Structured decision making as a conceptual framework to identify thresholds for conservation and management. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[32]  A. Friedlander,et al.  Coupling ecology and GIS to evaluate efficacy of marine protected areas in Hawaii. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[33]  Robert M. Dorazio,et al.  Estimating Occupancy Dynamics in an Anuran Assemblage from Louisiana, USA , 2011 .

[34]  Daniel C Reed,et al.  Habitat continuity and geographic distance predict population genetic differentiation in giant kelp. , 2010, Ecology.

[35]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Prioritizing global conservation efforts , 2006, Nature.

[36]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Hierarchical Modeling and Inference in Ecology: The Analysis of Data from Populations, Metapopulations and Communities , 2008 .

[37]  J. Nichols,et al.  Monitoring for conservation. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[38]  Eve McDonald-Madden,et al.  Making robust decisions for conservation with restricted money and knowledge , 2008 .

[39]  J Andrew Royle,et al.  Models for inference in dynamic metacommunity systems. , 2010, Ecology.

[40]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY RATES WHEN DETECTION PROBABILITIES ARE LESS THAN ONE , 2002, Ecology.

[41]  James T. Peterson,et al.  INTROGRESSIVE HYBRIDIZATION BETWEEN NATIVE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND INTRODUCED RAINBOW TROUT , 2003 .

[42]  J. Lawton,et al.  Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies , 1993, Nature.