The repeatability of an intraoral dental colorimeter.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM Characterizing and reproducing color remain one of the most challenging aspects of dentistry. A relatively new intraoral colorimeter measures the color of natural teeth and metal-ceramic restorations and prints out a color recipe for the Vintage Halo Porcelain System. The reliability of the colorimeter is unknown. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of a contact dental colorimeter and to correlate the shade registered by the colorimeter with the shade selected by experienced clinicians. MATERIALS AND METHODS In part I of the study, 2 examiners (A and B) took 2 colorimeter measurements from the maxillary right central incisors of 11 subjects. The examiners were blinded to their own data and those of other investigators. The readings were repeated 3 weeks later with the same protocol. The Cronbach alpha reliability coefficient was used to analyze the collected data. In part II of the study, 2 experienced clinicians (examiners D and E) selected a shade from the classic Vita Lumin Vacuum shade guide for the maxillary right central incisors of the same 11 subjects. The clinicians were blinded to each other's selections and the colorimeter readings. It should be noted that the manufacturer of the colorimeter uses the terms shade, value, and hue to represent chroma, value, and hue, respectively, as defined in the Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms (J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:39-110). RESULTS The reliability analysis results for each of the combined trials for shade, value, and hue were all >.94. The interexaminer reliability alpha values were >.9 for shade and value and.64 to.74 for hue. The interexaminer alpha represented the value range of each of 4 measurements. The intraexaminer reliability alpha values for shade, value, and hue were.99,.95, and.96 for examiner A and.99,.93, and.97 for examiner B, respectively. In part II of the study, the colorimeter agreed with itself 82% of the time, whereas clinicians agreed with each other on the selected shade 73% of the time. Selections made by the colorimeter and the clinicians matched 55% to 64% of the time. CONCLUSIONS Within the limitations of this study, the colorimeter reliably measured the color of natural teeth.

[1]  L Miller,et al.  Organizing color in dentistry. , 1987, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[2]  R Lakowski,et al.  Instrumental colour measurement of vital and extracted human teeth. , 1981, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[3]  R J Goodkind,et al.  Three-dimensional color coordinates of natural teeth compared with three shade guides. , 1990, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[4]  D. L. Macadam,et al.  The measurement of appearance , 1975 .

[5]  J A Sorensen,et al.  Improved color matching of metal-ceramic restorations. Part I: A systematic method for shade determination. , 1987, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[6]  W M Johnston,et al.  Performance Assessment of Colorimetric Devices on Dental Porcelains , 1989, Journal of dental research.

[7]  W. J. O'brien,et al.  The assessment of Chroma sensitivity to porcelain pigments. , 1983, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  S R Okubo,et al.  Evaluation of visual and instrument shade matching. , 1998, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[9]  R. J. Goodkind,et al.  The conversion of Chromascan designations to CIE tristimulus values. , 1982, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[10]  R. Berns Billmeyer and Saltzman's Principles of Color Technology , 2000 .

[11]  R D Douglas,et al.  Predicting porcelain thickness required for dental shade matches. , 1999, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[12]  R R Seghi,et al.  Visual and Instrumental Colorimetric Assessments of Small Color Differences on Translucent Dental Porcelain , 1989, Journal of dental research.

[13]  W M Johnston,et al.  Assessment of Appearance Match by Visual Observation and Clinical Colorimetry , 1989, Journal of dental research.

[14]  W M Johnston,et al.  Double-layer Color Effects in Porcelain Systems , 1985, Journal of dental research.

[15]  G. Goldstein,et al.  Repeatability of a specially designed intraoral colorimeter. , 1993, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[16]  J D Preston,et al.  Current status of shade selection and color matching. , 1985, Quintessence international.

[17]  A. Yap Color attributes and accuracy of Vita-based manufacturers' shade guides. , 1998, Operative dentistry.

[18]  R R Seghi,et al.  Effects of Instrument-measuring Geometry on Colorimetric Assessments of Dental Porcelains , 1990, Journal of dental research.

[19]  C. Groh,et al.  A New, Small-color-difference Equation for Dental Shades , 1990, Journal of dental research.

[20]  R. C. Sproull,et al.  Color matching in dentistry. Part II. Practical applications of the organization of color. 1973. , 1973, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[21]  S Ishikawa-Nagai,et al.  Using a computer color-matching system in color reproduction of porcelain restorations. Part 3: A newly developed spectrophotometer designed for clinical application. , 1994, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[22]  R J Goodkind,et al.  Use of a fiber-optic colorimeter for in vivo color measurements of 2830 anterior teeth. , 1987, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[23]  S. Rosenstiel,et al.  The effects of manipulative variables on the color of ceramic metal restorations. , 1988, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[24]  W M Johnston,et al.  Spectrophotometric analysis of color differences between porcelain systems. , 1986, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[25]  T P van der Burgt,et al.  A comparison of new and conventional methods for quantification of tooth color. , 1990, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[26]  W D Culpepper,et al.  A comparative study of shade-matching procedures. , 1970, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.