A Robust Identity-by-Descent Procedure Using Affected Sib Pairs: Multipoint Mapping for Complex Diseases

Multipoint linkage analysis is a powerful tool to localize susceptibility genes for complex diseases. However, the conventional lod score method relies critically on the correct specification of mode of inheritance for accurate estimation of gene position. On the other hand, allele-sharing methods, as currently practiced, are designed to test the null hypothesis of no linkage rather than estimate the location of the susceptibility gene(s). In this paper, we propose an identity-by-descent (IBD)-based procedure to estimate the location of an unobserved susceptibility gene within a chromosomal region framed by multiple markers. Here we deal with the practical situation where some of the markers might not be fully informative. Rather the IBD statistic at an arbitrary within the region is imputed using the multipoint marker information. The method is robust in that no assumption about the genetic mechanism is required other than that the region contains no more than one susceptibility gene. In particular, this approach builds upon a simple representation for the expected IBD at any arbitrary locus within the region using data from affected sib pairs. With this representation, one can carry out a parametric inference procedure to locate an unobserved susceptibility gene. In addition, here we derive a sample size formula for the number of affected sib pairs needed to detect linkage with multiple markers. Throughout, the proposed method is illustrated through simulated data. We have implemented this method including exploratory and formal model-fitting procedures to locate susceptibility genes, plus sample size and power calculations in a program, GENEFINDER, which will be made available shortly.

[1]  R C Elston,et al.  Lods, wrods, and mods: The interpretation of lod scores calculated under different models , 1994, Genetic epidemiology.

[2]  Frederick R. Forst,et al.  On robust estimation of the location parameter , 1980 .

[3]  P. J. Huber The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions , 1967 .

[4]  L Kruglyak,et al.  Parametric and nonparametric linkage analysis: a unified multipoint approach. , 1996, American journal of human genetics.

[5]  S E Hodge,et al.  The essence of single ascertainment. , 1996, Genetics.

[6]  N. Risch Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. I. Multilocus models. , 1990, American journal of human genetics.

[7]  C. A. Smith,et al.  Testing for heterogeneity of recombination fraction values in Human Genetics , 1963, Annals of human genetics.

[8]  A S Whittemore,et al.  Genome scanning for linkage: an overview. , 1996, American journal of human genetics.

[9]  T Reich,et al.  The generalized sib pair IBD distribution: its use in the detection of linkage , 1978, Annals of human genetics.

[10]  M. Boehnke,et al.  Genetic linkage analysis of complex genetic traits by using affected sibling pairs. , 1998, Biometrics.

[11]  Paul J. Rathouz,et al.  Determining linkage and mode of inheritance: Mod scores and other methods , 1996 .

[12]  A. Whittemore,et al.  A class of tests for linkage using affected pedigree members. , 1994, Biometrics.

[13]  N J Cox,et al.  Allele-sharing models: LOD scores and accurate linkage tests. , 1997, American journal of human genetics.

[14]  S. Zeger,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models , 1986 .

[15]  N. Schork,et al.  Two-trait-locus linkage analysis: a powerful strategy for mapping complex genetic traits. , 1993, American journal of human genetics.

[16]  E. Lander,et al.  Genetic dissection of complex traits: guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results , 1995, Nature Genetics.

[17]  C. Maclean,et al.  Distribution of lod scores under uncertain mode of inheritance. , 1993, American journal of human genetics.

[18]  R. Elston,et al.  The investigation of linkage between a quantitative trait and a marker locus , 1972, Behavior genetics.

[19]  N. Risch Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. II. The power of affected relative pairs. , 1990, American journal of human genetics.

[20]  D Siegmund,et al.  Multipoint linkage analysis using affected relative pairs and partially informative markers. , 1998, Biometrics.

[21]  V. Vieland,et al.  Adequacy of single‐locus approximations for linkage analyses of oligogenic traits , 1992, Genetic epidemiology.

[22]  G. Vogler,et al.  Detection of linkage under heterogeneity: Comparison of the two‐locus vs. admixture models , 1992, Genetic epidemiology.