Achieving near-correct focus cues in a 3D display using multiple image planes

Focus cues specify inappropriate 3-D scene parameters in conventional displays because the light comes from a single surface, independent of the depth relations in the portrayed scene. This can lead to distortions in perceived depth, as well as discomfort and fatigue due to the differing demands on accommodation and vergence. Here we examine the efficacy of a stereo-display prototype designed to minimize these problems by using multiple image planes to present near-correct focus cues. Each eye’s view is the sum of several images presented at different focal distances. Image intensities are assigned based on the dioptric distance of each image plane from the portrayed object, determined along visual lines. The stimulus to accommodation is more consistent with the portrayed depth than with conventional displays, but it still differs from the stimulus in equivalent real scenes. Compared to a normal, fixed-distance display, observers showed improved stereoscopic performance in different psychophysical tasks including speed of fusing stereoscopic images, precision of depth discrimination, and accuracy of perceived depth estimates. The multiple image-planes approach provides a practical solution for some shortcomings of conventional displays.

[1]  M. Landy,et al.  Why Is Spatial Stereoresolution So Low? , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  Matthias Wöpking,et al.  Viewing comfort with stereoscopic pictures : an experimental study on the subjective effects of disparity magnitude and depth of focus , 1995 .

[3]  Mark Mon-Williams,et al.  Natural problems for stereoscopic depth perception in virtual environments , 1995, Vision Research.

[4]  Martin S. Banks,et al.  A stereo display prototype with multiple focal distances , 2004, SIGGRAPH 2004.

[5]  Marc O. Ernst,et al.  Screen cues to flatness do affect 3d percepts , 2002 .

[6]  Mark de Berg,et al.  Computational geometry: algorithms and applications , 1997 .

[7]  F. A. Miles,et al.  Changes in the Coupling between Accommodation and Vergence Eye Movements Induced in Human Subjects by Altering the Effective Interocular Separation , 1985, Perception.

[8]  David C. Knill Discrimination of planar surface slant from texture: human and ideal observers compared , 1998, Vision Research.

[9]  G. Hung,et al.  Convergence and Divergence Exhibit Different Response Characteristics to Symmetric Stimuli , 1997, Vision Research.

[10]  Myron W. Krueger,et al.  Dynamic focusing in head-mounted displays , 1999, Electronic Imaging.

[11]  Steven L. Wright IBM 9.2-megapixel flat-panel display: technology and infrastructure , 2002, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[12]  M. Landy,et al.  Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion , 1995, Vision Research.

[13]  G Smith,et al.  Effect of Defocus on Visual Acuity As Measured by Source and Observer Methods , 1989, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[14]  Pat Hanrahan,et al.  Achieving Near-Correct Focus Cues Using Multiple Image Planes , 2004 .

[15]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[16]  James M. Hillis,et al.  Slant from texture and disparity cues: optimal cue combination. , 2004, Journal of vision.