Influence of Pluronic F127 on the distribution and functionality of inkjet-printed biomolecules in porous nitrocellulose substrates.

The distribution of inkjet-printed biomolecules in porous nitrocellulose substrates often results in a non-homogeneous spot morphology commonly referred to as 'doughnut-shaped' spots. We have studied the influence of Pluronic F127 (an amphiphilic surfactant) on the functionality of inkjet-printed primary antibody molecules and on the final assay result by performing a one-step antibody binding assay in the nitrocellulose substrate. The primary antibody was printed with and without Pluronic, followed by the addition of double-labelled amplicons as antigen molecules and a fluorophore-labelled streptavidin as detection conjugate. The distribution of the fluorescence intensity down into the nitrocellulose substrate was investigated by confocal laser scanning microscopy in 'Z' stacking mode. Each horizontal slice was further analysed by applying a concentric ring format and the fluorescence intensity in each slice was represented in a colour-coded way. The mean and total fluorescence intensity of the antibody binding assay (fluorescent streptavidin) showed a peak at 0.2% (w/v) Pluronic F127. In addition, an improved spot morphology was observed also peaking at the same Pluronic concentration. Subsequently, we investigated the direct influence of Pluronic F127 on the location of the primary antibody molecules by labelling these molecules with the fluorophore Alexa-488. Our results show that upon increasing the concentration of Pluronic F127 in the printing buffer, the spot diameter increased and the number of primary antibody molecules bound in the spot area gradually decreased. This was confirmed by analysing the distribution of fluorescently labelled primary antibody molecules down into the membrane layers. We conclude that a particular ratio between primary antibody and Pluronic F127 molecules in combination with available substrate binding capacity results in an optimal orientation, that is Fab-UP, of the primary antibody molecules. Consequently, an increased number of antigen molecules (in our case the labelled amplicons) and of the fluorescent detection conjugate (streptavidin) will give an optimal signal. Moreover, distribution of the primary antibody molecules was more homogeneous at the optimal Pluronic F127 concentration, contributing to the better spot morphology observed.

[1]  T. Dupont,et al.  Capillary flow as the cause of ring stains from dried liquid drops , 1997, Nature.

[2]  Ming-Che Wu,et al.  Development of a Novel Biochip for Rapid Multiplex Detection of Seven Mastitis-Causing Pathogens in Bovine Milk Samples , 2008, Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.

[3]  J. She,et al.  Protein microarrays to detect protein-protein interactions using red and green fluorescent proteins. , 2002, Analytical biochemistry.

[4]  S. Levy,et al.  Effects of relative humidity and buffer additives on the contact printing of microarrays by quill pins. , 2003, Analytical biochemistry.

[5]  W. Norde,et al.  Interaction of bovine serum albumin and human blood plasma with PEO-tethered surfaces: influence of PEO chain length, grafting density, and temperature. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[6]  Koch,et al.  A Study of the Temperature-Dependent Micellization of Pluronic F127. , 1999, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[7]  Aart Amerongen,et al.  Rapid mastitis detection assay on porous nitrocellulose membrane slides , 2013, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[8]  Martin Dufva,et al.  Fabrication of high quality microarrays. , 2005, Biomolecular engineering.

[9]  J. Hoheisel,et al.  Manufacturing DNA microarrays of high spot homogeneity and reduced background signal. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.

[10]  M. Haine,et al.  Van Damme A. , 1986 .

[11]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[12]  Junhong Min,et al.  Signal enhancement in a protein chip array using a 3-D nanosurface. , 2010, Ultramicroscopy.

[13]  M. Tarlov,et al.  Determination of protein aggregation with differential mobility analysis: Application to IgG antibody , 2008, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[14]  A. Mishra,et al.  A fluorescence study on the interaction of telmisartan in triblock polymers pluronic P123 and F127. , 2014, Spectrochimica acta. Part A, Molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy.

[15]  Nagel,et al.  Contact line deposits in an evaporating drop , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[16]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Adsorption of pluronic F-127 on surfaces with different hydrophobicities probed by quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation. , 2009, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[17]  T. Scheper,et al.  Protein microarrays: Reduced autofluorescence and improved LOD , 2010 .

[18]  G. Marko‐Varga,et al.  Porous silicon protein microarray technology and ultra-/superhydrophobic states for improved bioanalytical readout. , 2007, Biotechnology annual review.

[19]  T. Scheper,et al.  Optimization of a Microarray Sandwich‐ELISA against hINF‐γ on a Modified Nitrocellulose Membrane , 2007 .

[20]  A. Raap,et al.  Quantitative assessment of a novel flow-through porous microarray for the rapid analysis of gene expression profiles. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[21]  Aart van Amerongen,et al.  Carbon nanoparticles as detection labels in antibody microarrays. Detection of genes encoding virulence factors in Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli. , 2011, Analytical chemistry.

[22]  E. B. Butler,et al.  Antibody microarray profiling of human prostate cancer sera: Antibody screening and identification of potential biomarkers , 2003, Proteomics.

[23]  A. Kabanov,et al.  A simple way to enhance Doxil® therapy: drug release from liposomes at the tumor site by amphiphilic block copolymer. , 2013, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[24]  W. Norde,et al.  Interfacial behaviour of proteins, with special reference to immunoglobulins. A physicochemical study. , 2012, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[25]  Aaron R Wheeler,et al.  Pluronic additives: a solution to sticky problems in digital microfluidics. , 2008, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[26]  Aart van Amerongen,et al.  Influence of buffer composition on the distribution of inkjet printed protein molecules and the resulting spot morphology. , 2012, Talanta.

[27]  Aart van Amerongen,et al.  Distribution of biomolecules in porous nitrocellulose membrane pads using confocal laser scanning microscopy and high-speed cameras. , 2013, Analytical chemistry.

[28]  Qi Zhang,et al.  Development of high concentrated aqueous silver nanofluid and inkjet printing on ceramic substrates , 2012 .

[29]  Jules Beekwilder,et al.  Antibody orientation on biosensor surfaces: a minireview. , 2013, The Analyst.

[30]  I. In,et al.  Triggered pH/redox responsive release of doxorubicin from prepared highly stable graphene with thiol grafted Pluronic. , 2013, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[31]  A. Guo,et al.  Transport at air/water interface is reason for rings in protein microarrays , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[32]  Eliane Souteyrand,et al.  Droplet evaporation study applied to DNA chip manufacturing. , 2005, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[33]  J. Petrik,et al.  Diagnostic applications of microarrays , 2006, Transfusion medicine.

[34]  T. A. Hatton,et al.  Poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(propylene oxide )-poly (ethylene oxide) block copolymer surfactants in aqueous solutions and at interfaces: thermodynamics, structure, dynamics, and modeling , 1995 .

[35]  David W Grainger,et al.  Comparison of hydroxylated print additives on antibody microarray performance. , 2006, Journal of proteome research.

[36]  R. Hilhorst,et al.  Peptide microarrays for detailed, high-throughput substrate identification, kinetic characterization, and inhibition studies on protein kinase A. , 2009, Analytical biochemistry.

[37]  W. Norde,et al.  Spot morphology of non-contact printed protein molecules on non-porous substrates with a range of hydrophobicities. , 2013, The Analyst.

[38]  Frances S Ligler,et al.  A microarray immunoassay for simultaneous detection of proteins and bacteria. , 2002, Analytical chemistry.

[39]  C. Frank,et al.  Antibody adsorption and orientation on hydrophobic surfaces. , 2012, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[40]  R. Deegan,et al.  Pattern formation in drying drops , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[41]  Reinhard Niessner,et al.  Preparation and characterization of functional poly(ethylene glycol) surfaces for the use of antibody microarrays. , 2007, Analytical chemistry.

[42]  J. Baumard,et al.  Inkjet-Printing-Engineered Functional Microdot Arrays Made of Mesoporous Hybrid Organosilicas , 2010 .