Off on the Wrong Foot: Local Features in Biological Motion

Biological-motion perception consists of a number of different phenomena. They include global mechanisms that support the retrieval of the coherent shape of a walker, but also mechanisms which derive information from the local motion of its parts about facing direction and animacy, independent of the particular shape of the display. A large body of the literature on biological-motion perception is based on a synthetic stimulus generated by an algorithm published by James Cutting in 1978 (Perception 7 393–405). Here we show that this particular stimulus lacks a visual invariant inherent to the local motion of the feet of a natural walker, which in more realistic motion patterns indicates the facing direction of a walker independent of its shape. Comparing Cutting's walker to a walker derived from motion-captured data of real human walkers, we find no difference between the two displays in a detection task designed such that observers had to rely on global shape. In a direction discrimination task, however, in which only local motion was accessible to the observer, performance on Cutting's walker was at chance, while direction could still be retrieved from the stimuli derived from the real walker.

[1]  S. Runeson,et al.  Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person and action perception: Expe , 1983 .

[2]  Dorita H. F. Chang,et al.  Acceleration carries the local inversion effect in biological motion perception. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[3]  F. Simion,et al.  A predisposition for biological motion in the newborn baby , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  M. Lappe,et al.  Perception of biological motion from limited-lifetime stimuli , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  Q. Vuong,et al.  Incidental Processing of Biological Motion , 2004, Current Biology.

[6]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  The visual perception of human locomotion. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[7]  P. Holcomb,et al.  In: Understanding Events: How Humans See, Represent, and Act on Events. , 2007 .

[8]  M. P. Murray.  Gait as a total pattern of movement. , 1967, American journal of physical medicine.

[9]  M. Giese,et al.  Learning to discriminate complex movements: biological versus artificial trajectories. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[10]  Markus Lappe,et al.  The role of spatial and temporal information in biological motion perception , 2008, Advances in cognitive psychology.

[11]  Eric Hiris,et al.  Detection of biological and nonbiological motion. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[12]  G. Mather,et al.  Low-level visual processing of biological motion , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Visually Inexperienced Chicks Exhibit Spontaneous Preference for Biological Motion Patterns , 2005, PLoS biology.

[14]  M. Lappe,et al.  Recognition of Biological Motion from Blurred Natural Scenes , 2006, Perception.

[15]  Ayse Pinar Saygin,et al.  In the Footsteps of Biological Motion and Multisensory Perception , 2008, Psychological science.

[16]  K. Verfaillie.  Perceiving Human Locomotion: Priming Effects in Direction Discrimination , 2000, Brain and Cognition.

[17]  Bennett I. Bertenthal,et al.  Global Processing of Biological Motions , 1994 .

[18]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Eccentric perception of biological motion is unscalably poor , 2005, Vision Research.

[19]  P. Sinha,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of biological motion perception in humans , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  N. Troje,et al.  The Inversion Effect in Biological Motion Perception: Evidence for a “Life Detector”? , 2006, Current Biology.

[21]  Nikolaus F. Troje,et al.  Retrieving Information from Human Movement Patterns , 2008 .

[22]  J. Cutting.  Generation of Synthetic Male and Female Walkers through Manipulation of a Biomechanical Invariant , 1978, Perception.

[23]  Akihiro Yagi,et al.  Biological Motion Alters Coherent Motion Perception , 2008, Perception.

[24]  N. F. Troje,et al.  2.13 – Biological Motion Perception , 2008 .

[25]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Gravity bias in the interpretation of biological motion by inexperienced chicks , 2006, Current Biology.

[26]  G Johansson,et al.  Spatio-temporal differentiation and integration in visual motion perception , 1976, Psychological research.

[27]  Murray Mp,et al.  Gait as a total pattern of movement. , 1967 .

[28]  David C. Burr,et al.  Seeing biological motion , 1998, Nature.

[29]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display , 1977 .

[30]  W. Krieg.  Functional Neuroanatomy , 1953, Springer Series in Experimental Entomology.

[31]  J. Cutting.  Coding Theory Adapted to Gait Perception , 1981 .

[32]  Dorita H. F. Chang,et al.  Perception of animacy and direction from local biological motion signals. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[33]  Kiyoshi Fujimoto,et al.  Motion Induction from Biological Motion , 2003, Perception.

[34]  J A Beintema,et al.  Perception of biological motion without local image motion , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  N. Troje.  Decomposing biological motion: a framework for analysis and synthesis of human gait patterns. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[36]  G. Johansson.  Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[37]  Mark H Johnson,et al.  Biological Motion: A Perceptual Life Detector? , 2006, Current Biology.

[38]  J E Cutting,et al.  Masking the motions of human gait , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.