Gestational age affects the cerebellum development in neonatal infants: establishment of cerebellar extrauterine reference values as a function of gestational age

This studyaims toprovide the cerebellar extrauterine reference value related to gestational age by analysing the neonatal cerebellum development with di ferent gestational age, by means of cranial ultrasound. A total of 376 eligible cranial ultrasound images of neonates with gestational age of 25 to 41 weeks were selected. Transverse cerebellar diameter, vermis height, vermis diameter, vermis circumference, vermis area and vermis eccentricity ratio were measured and followed by statistical analysis. Transverse cerebellar diameter formed a linear equation with the gestational age, which was Y = 0.104X + 0.176, R = 0.735 (P< 0.001). Vermis height formed a linear equation with the gestational age, which was Y = 0.069X 0.328, R = 0.825 (P< 0.001). Vermis diameter formed a linear equation with the gestational age, which was Y = 0.051X 0.604, R = 0.749 (P < 0.001). Vermis circumference formed a linear equationwith the gestational age, which was Y = 0.284X 1.709, R = 0.788 (P < 0.001). Vermis area formeda linear equationwith thegestational age,which was Y = 0.227X 4.445, R = 0.82 (P < 0.001). Vermis eccentricity ratio formed a linear equation with the gestational age, which was Y = -0.01X + 0.909, R = 0.142 (P< 0.001). The positive correlation between vermis height and gestational age was the strongest (r = 0.908, P<0.001). The results provided that the cerebellar extrauterine reference range, between transverse cerebellar diameter, vermis height, vermis diameter, vermis circumference, vermis area, vermis eccentricity ratio of neonates of appropriate for gestational age. Gestational age is helpful for clinical diagnosis andevaluationof cerebellum growth and development of newborns.

[1]  Jörn Diedrichsen,et al.  A representative template of the neonatal cerebellum , 2019, NeuroImage.

[2]  R. Sillitoe,et al.  Insights into cerebellar development and connectivity , 2019, Neuroscience Letters.

[3]  A. Qiu,et al.  Cerebellar development and its mediation role in cognitive planning in childhood , 2018, Human brain mapping.

[4]  J. Dudink,et al.  Prenatal cerebellar growth trajectories and the impact of periconceptional maternal and fetal factors , 2017, Human reproduction.

[5]  Petronella Anbeek,et al.  Brain Volumes at Term-Equivalent Age in Preterm Infants: Imaging Biomarkers for Neurodevelopmental Outcome through Early School Age. , 2016, The Journal of pediatrics.

[6]  J. Dudink,et al.  Periconception Maternal Folate Status and Human Embryonic Cerebellum Growth Trajectories: The Rotterdam Predict Study , 2015, PloS one.

[7]  C. Limperopoulos,et al.  Developmental Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome in Ex-preterm Survivors Following Cerebellar Injury , 2015, The Cerebellum.

[8]  A. Shakiba The role of the cerebellum in neurobiology of psychiatric disorders. , 2014, Neurologic clinics.

[9]  Aleksandra Badura,et al.  The Cerebellum, Sensitive Periods, and Autism , 2014, Neuron.

[10]  M. Hayran,et al.  Nomograms of cerebellar vermis height and transverse cerebellar diameter in appropriate-for-gestational-age neonates. , 2013, Early human development.

[11]  S. Martinez,et al.  Cellular and molecular basis of cerebellar development , 2013, Front. Neuroanat..

[12]  Andrew W. Fitzgibbon,et al.  Direct Least Square Fitting of Ellipses , 1999, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..