Developing a Metric of Usable Space for Zoo Exhibits

The size of animal exhibits has important effects on their lives and welfare. However, most references to exhibit size only consider floor space and height dimensions, without considering the space afforded by usable features within the exhibit. In this paper, we develop two possible methods for measuring the usable space of zoo exhibits and apply these to a sample exhibit. Having a metric for usable space in place will provide a better reflection of the quality of different exhibits, and enhance comparisons between exhibits.

[1]  S. Vick,et al.  Perception of available space during chimpanzee introductions: Number of accessible areas is more important than enclosure size. , 2015, Zoo biology.

[2]  P. Hemsworth,et al.  Little penguins, Eudyptula minor, show increased avoidance, aggression and vigilance in response to zoo visitors , 2015 .

[3]  S. MacDonald,et al.  Individual Effects of Seasonal Changes, Visitor Density, and Concurrent Bear Behavior on Stereotypical Behaviors in Captive Polar Bears (Ursus maritimus) , 2015, Journal of applied animal welfare science : JAAWS.

[4]  Megan Anderson.  Reaching New Heights: The Effect of an Environmentally Enhanced Outdoor Enclosure on Gibbons in a Zoo Setting , 2014, Journal of applied animal welfare science : JAAWS.

[5]  Bonnie M. Perdue,et al.  Zoo Animal Welfare , 2013, Animal Welfare.

[6]  D. Gaalema,et al.  Postoccupancy evaluations in zoological settings. , 2011, Zoo biology.

[7]  K. Leighty,et al.  How access to exhibit space impacts the behavior of female tigers (Panthera tigris). , 2011, Zoo biology.

[8]  F. Clark.  Space to choose: network analysis of social preferences in a captive chimpanzee community, and implications for management , 2011, American journal of primatology.

[9]  S. Schapiro,et al.  Space use selectivity by chimpanzees and gorillas in an indoor–outdoor enclosure , 2011, American journal of primatology.

[10]  S. Schapiro,et al.  Space use as an indicator of enclosure appropriateness: A novel measure of captive animal welfare , 2009 .

[11]  Dwight Scott,et al.  Facility design for Bachelor Gorilla groups. , 2009, Zoo biology.

[12]  J. Petherick,et al.  Spatial requirements of animals: Allometry and beyond , 2007 .

[13]  T. Maple.  Toward a Science of Welfare for Animals in the Zoo , 2007, Journal of applied animal welfare science : JAAWS.

[14]  G. Hosey.  How does the zoo environment affect the behaviour of captive primates , 2005 .

[15]  Sarah M. Bexell,et al.  Nest Building in Captive Gorilla gorilla gorilla , 2003, International Journal of Primatology.

[16]  A. M. Kitchen,et al.  The effects of cage size and complexity on the behaviour of captive common marmosets, Callithrix jacchus jacchus , 1996, Laboratory animals.

[17]  D. Balph,et al.  On spatial requirements of captive social animals , 1985, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  J. Eisenberg.  Orang-Utan Behavior , 1981 .

[19]  T. Maple.  Elevating the priority of zoo animal welfare: the chief executive as an agent of reform. , 2014, Zoo biology.

[20]  K. Bard,et al.  Orangutan Use of Vertical Space in an Innovative Habitat , 2000 .

[21]  D. Shepherdson,et al.  Environmental enrichment for felids: an integrated approach , 1997 .

[22]  Lorraine A. Perkins,et al.  Variables that influence the activity of captive orangutans , 1992 .

[23]  T. Poole.  Criteria for the provision of captive environments , 1991 .

[24]  T. Maple,et al.  Applied primatology in the modern zoo , 1989 .

[25]  F. Waal.  The myth of a simple relation between space and aggression in captive primates , 1989 .

[26]  Betty Goerke,et al.  Behavioral changes of a juvenile gorilla after a transfer to a more naturalistic environment , 1987 .

[27]  T. Maple,et al.  Evaluating the Environments of Captive Nonhuman Primates , 1986 .

[28]  R. L..  Wild Animals in Captivity , 1898, Nature.