Risk constrained profit maximization under UI mechanism in India

The paper describes a risk constraint profit maximization model of a generator participating in day a-head electricity market under Availability Based Tariff regime (ABT) for Indian market. The Unscheduled Interchange (UI) mechanism introduced to control frequency deviation, thereby maintaining the security of the system in real time. The model described here considers the stochastic behavior of load schedules and unscheduled interchange along with other constraints on a season wise time frame. Stochastic programming technique is being used to solve the risk constraint expected profit maximization problem. Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) for the distribution of daily profit is used as a risk trade off measure. The effectiveness of this approach is tested for power producers in electricity market. A numerical example of a generating station is being illustrated to show the revenue maximization problem.

[1]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Security-constrained optimal generation scheduling for GENCOs , 2004 .

[2]  Jun Xu,et al.  Power Portfolio Optimization in Deregulated Electricity Markets With Risk Management , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[3]  S. Rourke,et al.  Optimal integrated generation bidding and scheduling with risk management under a deregulated power market , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[4]  Eileen Cashman,et al.  Influence of operational risk assessment on bidding strategies in power markets , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[5]  N. Vaitheeswaran,et al.  ANN-based block frequency prediction in ABT regime and optimal availability declaration , 2008, 2008 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting - Conversion and Delivery of Electrical Energy in the 21st Century.

[6]  A. Bakirtzis,et al.  Bidding strategies for electricity producers in a competitive electricity marketplace , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  S. N. Singh,et al.  Risk constraint profit maximization in a multi-electricity market , 2014, 2014 IEEE PES General Meeting | Conference & Exposition.

[8]  A. Conejo,et al.  A Stochastic Programming Approach to Electric Energy Procurement for Large Consumers , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[9]  Stan Uryasev,et al.  Conditional value-at-risk: optimization algorithms and applications , 2000, Proceedings of the IEEE/IAFE/INFORMS 2000 Conference on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering (CIFEr) (Cat. No.00TH8520).

[10]  N. Vaitheeswaran,et al.  Stochastic model for optimal declaration of day ahead station availability in power pools in India , 2006, 2006 IEEE Power India Conference.

[11]  Jun Xu.  An optimization-based approach for facility energy management with uncertainties, and, Power portfolio optimization in deregulated electricity markets with risk management , 2006 .

[12]  B. Wollenberg,et al.  Risk assessment of generators bidding in day-ahead market , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[13]  P. Luh,et al.  Optimal integrated generation bidding and scheduling with risk management under a deregulated daily power market , 2002, 2002 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37309).

[14]  C. Alexander,et al.  Market risk analysis IV: value-at-risk models , 2008 .

[15]  P. Nagaraju,et al.  Assessment of Risk involved with Bidding Strategies of a Genco in a Day Ahead Market , 2004 .

[16]  R. Rockafellar,et al.  Optimization of conditional value-at risk , 2000 .