Mathematics Learning in Groups: Analyzing Equity in Two Cooperative Activity Structures

Many mathematics classrooms use cooperative learning to support equitable learning environments for all students. Past research in the field has focused primarily on increasing achievement rather than on contexts that support equitable interactions. This year-long study in 3 secondary mathematics classes compares 2 activity structures—a group quiz and a presentation—by examining group interaction within the 2 activities. The analysis shows that groups constructed a range of work practices, including a practice focused on collaboration, one focused on individual work, and one focused on “helping.” In addition, students adopted a variety of positions, including expert, novice, in-between, and facilitator. In this data corpus, experts tended to dominate interactions during group quizzes, whereas presentation preparations were more equitable, particularly when a student was positioned as a facilitator. Based on the analysis, suggestions are provided for structuring more equitable mathematics group work.

[1]  B. Davies,et al.  Positioning: The Discursive Production of Selves , 1990 .

[2]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Student Teams and Achievement Divisions. , 1978 .

[3]  Rachel A. Lotan,et al.  Working for Equity in Heterogeneous Classrooms: Sociological Theory in Practice (Sociology of Education Series) , 1997 .

[4]  Robert J. Stevens,et al.  The Cooperative Elementary School: Effects on Students’ Achievement, Attitudes, and Social Relations , 1995 .

[5]  Alexander W. Chizhik,et al.  Equity and Status in Group Collaboration: Learning Through Explanations Depends on Task Characteristics , 2001 .

[6]  A. Su,et al.  The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics , 1932, The Mathematical Gazette.

[7]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Bothered by abstraction: the effect of expertise on knowledge transfer and subsequent novice performance. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[8]  Paul Cobb,et al.  Cultivating Students' Discipline-Specific Dispositions as a Critical Goal for Pedagogy and Equity , 2006 .

[9]  N. Webb,et al.  The Development of Students' Helping Behavior and Learning in Peer-Directed Small Groups , 2003 .

[10]  Lauren R. Heller,et al.  Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on mathematics and school adjustment: A component analysis. , 1992 .

[11]  M. Azmitia.  Peer Interaction and Problem Solving: When Are Two Heads Better Than One?. , 1988 .

[12]  Frederick Erickson,et al.  Definition and Analysis of Data from Videotape: Some Research Procedures and Their Rationales , 2006 .

[13]  J. Wertsch.  Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind , 1985 .

[14]  J. Boaler.  How a Detracked Mathematics Approach Promoted Respect, Responsibility, and High Achievement , 2006 .

[15]  Patricia F. Vadasy,et al.  Cooperative Learning: Prevalence, Conceptualizations, and the Relation Between Research and Practice , 1998 .

[16]  Jo Boaler,et al.  Promoting ‘relational equity’ and high mathematics achievement through an innovative mixed‐ability approach , 2008 .

[17]  N. Webb.  Task-Related Verbal Interaction and Mathematics Learning in Small Groups. , 1991 .

[18]  J. Wertsch.  The zone of proximal development: Some conceptual issues† , 1984 .

[19]  Ed Elbers,et al.  Reshaping diversity in a local classroom: Communication and identity issues in multicultural schools in the Netherlands , 2005 .

[20]  E. Goffman,et al.  Forms of talk , 1982 .

[21]  Brigid Barron.  When Smart Groups Fail , 2003 .

[22]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[23]  Penelope Eckert,et al.  Jocks and Burnouts: Social Categories and Identity in the High School , 1989 .

[24]  G. Hatano,et al.  TWO COURSES OF EXPERTISE , 1984 .

[25]  Judit N. Moschkovich,et al.  A Situated and Sociocultural Perspective on Bilingual Mathematics Learners , 2002 .

[26]  Brigid Barron.  Achieving Coordination in Collaborative Problem-Solving Groups , 2000 .

[27]  Geoffrey B. Saxe,et al.  Ethnic and Academic Identities: A Cultural Practice Perspective on Emerging Tensions and Their Management in the Lives of Minority Students , 2003 .

[28]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Guided, Cooperative Learning and Individual Knowledge Acquisition , 2018, Knowing, Learning, and Instruction.

[29]  J. Boaler,et al.  Creating Mathematical Futures through an Equitable Teaching Approach: The Case of Railside School , 2008, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[30]  G. Saxe,et al.  Cognition, development, and cultural practices. , 1999, New directions for child and adolescent development.

[31]  Kris D. Gutiérrez,et al.  Cultural Ways of Learning: Individual Traits or Repertoires of Practice , 2003 .

[32]  R. A. Engle,et al.  Guiding Principles for Fostering Productive Disciplinary Engagement: Explaining an Emergent Argument in a Community of Learners Classroom , 2002 .

[33]  Amalya Nattiv.  Helping Behaviors and Math Achievement Gain of Students Using Cooperative Learning , 1994, The Elementary School Journal.

[34]  James P. Lantolf,et al.  Vygotsky's Educational Theory in Cultural Context: Intrapersonal Communication and Internalization in the Second Language Classroom , 2003 .

[35]  S. Wortham.  From Good Student to Outcast: The Emergence of a Classroom Identity , 2004 .

[36]  E. Cohen.  Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups , 1994 .

[37]  W. Damon.  Peer education: The untapped potential , 1984 .

[38]  Rachel A. Lotan,et al.  Complex instruction: Equity in cooperative learning classrooms , 1999 .

[39]  L. Resnick,et al.  Knowing, Learning, and Instruction , 2018 .

[40]  Alexander W. Chizhik,et al.  The Rise and Fall of Power and Prestige Orders: Influence of Task Structure* , 2003 .

[41]  A. King.  Effects of training in strategic questioning on children's problem-solving performance , 1991 .

[42]  Mary Jo Pugh,et al.  New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development , 2002 .

[43]  Noreen M. Webb,et al.  Helping and getting help - essential skills for effective group problem solving , 1994 .

[44]  최영한,et al.  미국 NCTM의 Principles and Standards for School Mathematics에 나타난 수학과 교수,학습의 이론 , 2002 .