Ingroup/outgroup membership modulates fairness consideration: neural signatures from ERPs and EEG oscillations

Previous studies have shown that ingroup/outgroup membership influences individual’s fairness considerations. However, it is not clear yet how group membership influences brain activity when a recipient evaluates the fairness of asset distribution. In this study, subjects participated as recipients in an Ultimatum Game with alleged members of both an experimentally induced ingroup and outgroup. They either received extremely unequal, moderately unequal, or equal offers from proposers while electroencephalogram was recorded. Behavioral results showed that the acceptance rates for unequal offers were higher when interacting with ingroup partners than with outgroup partners. Analyses of event related potentials revealed that proposers’ group membership modulated offer evaluation at earlier processing stages. Feedback-related negativity was more negative for extremely and moderately unequal offers compared to equal offers in the ingroup interaction whereas it did not show differential responses to different offers in the outgroup interaction. Analyses of event related oscillations revealed that the theta power (4–6 Hz) was larger for moderately unequal offers than equal offers in the ingroup interaction whereas it did not show differential responses to different offers in the outgroup interaction. Thus, early mechanisms of fairness evaluation are strongly modulated by the ingroup/outgroup membership of the interaction partner.

[1]  W. Güth,et al.  An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining , 1982 .

[2]  R. Cattell.  The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors. , 1966, Multivariate behavioral research.

[3]  I. Daum,et al.  It is less than you expected: The feedback-related negativity reflects violations of reward magnitude expectations , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  Colin Camerer.  Strategizing in the Brain , 2003, Science.

[5]  A. Sanfey,et al.  Independent Coding of Reward Magnitude and Valence in the Human Brain , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Maarten A. S. Boksem,et al.  Fairness concerns predict medial frontal negativity amplitude in ultimatum bargaining , 2010, Social neuroscience.

[7]  Yarrow Dunham,et al.  Group bias in cooperative norm enforcement , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  Johannes Hewig,et al.  Decision-making in Blackjack: an electrophysiological analysis. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  D. Povinelli,et al.  Chimpanzees are indifferent to the welfare of unrelated group members , 2005, Nature.

[10]  E. Basar,et al.  Detection of P300 Waves in Single Trials by the Wavelet Transform (WT) , 1999, Brain and Language.

[11]  Xiaolin Zhou,et al.  Brain Activity in Fairness Consideration during Asset Distribution: Does the Initial Ownership Play a Role? , 2012, PloS one.

[12]  M. Brewer.  The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate? , 1999 .

[13]  J. Hewig,et al.  A neural signature of the creation of social evaluation. , 2014, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[14]  Chao C. Chen,et al.  Chinese Guanxi: The Good, the Bad and the Controversial , 2012 .

[15]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Brain potentials associated with expected and unexpected good and bad outcomes. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[16]  A. Leleu,et al.  Social identity-based motivation modulates attention bias toward negative information: an event-related brain potential study , 2011, Socioaffective neuroscience & psychology.

[17]  D. Amodio,et al.  For Members Only , 2014 .

[18]  Joydeep Srivastava,et al.  Role of Information Asymmetry and Situational Salience in Reducing Intergroup Bias , 2012, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[19]  Yuk Fai Cheong,et al.  HLM 6: Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling , 2000 .

[20]  Robert J. Oxoby,et al.  Social Interactions and the Salience of Social Identity , 2008, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[21]  D. Mobbs,et al.  Overlapping and distinct representations of advantageous and disadvantageous inequality , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[22]  Serge A R B Rombouts,et al.  Unfair? It depends: neural correlates of fairness in social context. , 2010, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[23]  Atsushi Sato,et al.  Effects of value and reward magnitude on feedback negativity and P300 , 2005, Neuroreport.

[24]  Quan Quan,et al.  Novel anti-thrombotic agent for modulation of protein disulfide isomerase family member ERp57 for prophylactic therapy , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[25]  Ping Zhang,et al.  Social distance and anonymity modulate fairness consideration: An ERP study , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[26]  John J. B. Allen,et al.  Theta lingua franca: a common mid-frontal substrate for action monitoring processes. , 2012, Psychophysiology.

[27]  J. Henrich,et al.  Costly Punishment Across Human Societies , 2006, Science.

[28]  Toshio Yamagishi,et al.  The private rejection of unfair offers and emotional commitment , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  P. Read Montague,et al.  When Things Are Better or Worse than Expected: The Medial Frontal Cortex and the Allocation of Processing Resources , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  Albert Newen,et al.  Hypnotic ingroup–outgroup suggestion influences economic decision-making in an Ultimatum Game , 2012, Consciousness and Cognition.

[31]  Matthew S. Tata,et al.  Right frontal cortex generates reward-related theta-band oscillatory activity , 2009, NeuroImage.

[32]  Xiaolin Zhou,et al.  Social distance modulates recipient's fairness consideration in the dictator game: An ERP study , 2011, Biological Psychology.

[33]  Joseph Dien,et al.  The ERP PCA Toolkit: An open source program for advanced statistical analysis of event-related potential data , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[34]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Why humans deviate from rational choice. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[35]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[36]  Joseph Dien,et al.  Evaluating two-step PCA of ERP data with Geomin, Infomax, Oblimin, Promax, and Varimax rotations. , 2010, Psychophysiology.

[37]  S. Makeig,et al.  Mining event-related brain dynamics , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  Giuseppe Sartori,et al.  Mentalizing in economic decision-making , 2008, Behavioural Brain Research.

[39]  Joseph Dien,et al.  Applying Principal Components Analysis to Event-Related Potentials: A Tutorial , 2012, Developmental neuropsychology.

[40]  Uta Sailer,et al.  Manipulation of feedback expectancy and valence induces negative and positive reward prediction error signals manifest in event-related brain potentials. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[41]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  The feedback-related negativity reflects the binary evaluation of good versus bad outcomes , 2006, Biological Psychology.

[42]  Jian Li,et al.  The Price of Racial Bias , 2013, Psychological science.

[43]  Michel J. J. Handgraaf,et al.  Less power or powerless? Egocentric empathy gaps and the irony of having little versus no power in social decision making. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[44]  Michael X. Cohen,et al.  Reward expectation modulates feedback-related negativity and EEG spectra , 2007, NeuroImage.

[45]  F. Fregni,et al.  Responding to Unfair Offers Made by a Friend: Neuroelectrical Activity Changes in the Anterior Medial Prefrontal Cortex , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  Johannes Hewig,et al.  Feedback-related potentials are sensitive to sequential order of decision outcomes in a gambling task. , 2012, Psychophysiology.

[47]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The Neural Basis of Economic Decision-Making in the Ultimatum Game , 2003, Science.

[48]  H. Tajfel.  Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations , 1982 .

[49]  S. Ferrari,et al.  Author contributions , 2021 .

[50]  E. Van Dijk,et al.  Social Comparison Affects Brain Responses to Fairness in Asset Division: An ERP Study with the Ultimatum Game , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[51]  J. Cavanagh,et al.  Frontal midline theta reflects anxiety and cognitive control: Meta-analytic evidence , 2015, Journal of Physiology-Paris.