The usefulness of Vistech and FACT contrast sensitivity charts for cataract and refractive surgery outcomes research

Aim: To investigate the repeatability and sensitivity of two commonly used sine wave patch charts for contrast sensitivity (CS) measurement in cataract and refractive surgery outcomes. Methods: The Vistech CS chart and its descendant, the Functional Acuity Contrast Test (FACT), were administered in three experiments: (1) Post-LASIK and age matched normal subjects; (2) Preoperative cataract surgery and age matched normal subjects; (3) Test-retest repeatability data in normal subjects. Results: Contrast sensitivity was similar between post-LASIK and control groups and between the Vistech and FACT charts. The percentage of subjects one month post-LASIK achieving the maximum score across spatial frequencies (1.5, 3, 6, 12, 18 cycles per degree) were (50, 33, 13, 13, 0 respectively) for FACT, but only (0, 0, 13, 4, 0 respectively) for Vistech. A small number of cataract patients also registered the maximum score on the FACT, but up to 60% did not achieve the minimum score. Test-retest intraclass correlation coefficients varied from 0.28 to 0.64 for Vistech and 0.18 to 0.45 for FACT. Bland-Altman limits of agreement across spatial frequencies were between ±0.30 and ±0.85 logCS for Vistech, and ±0.30 to ±0.75 logCS for FACT. Discussion: The Vistech was confirmed as providing poorly repeatable data. The FACT chart, likely because of a smaller step size, showed slightly better retest agreement. However, the reduced range of scores on the chart due to the smaller step size led to ceiling (post-LASIK) and floor (cataract) effects. These problems could mask subtle differences between groups of patients with near normal visual function as found post-refractive or cataract surgery. The Vistech and FACT CS charts are ill suited for refractive or cataract surgery outcomes research.

[1]  M. Bullimore,et al.  Improving the Reliability of the Pelli-Robson Contrast Sensitivity Test , 1991, Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System.

[2]  R A Applegate,et al.  Corneal first surface optical aberrations and visual performance. , 2000, Journal of refractive surgery.

[3]  L. Chylack,et al.  Contrast sensitivity and visual acuity in patients with early cataracts , 1993, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[4]  R. Eiferman,et al.  Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for myopia: six-month results. , 1991, Refractive & corneal surgery.

[5]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[6]  S. Lane,et al.  Use of the 193-NM excimer laser for myopic photorefractive keratectomy in sighted eyes: a multicenter study. , 1991, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[7]  GERALD M. LONG,et al.  Reliabilities of Alternate Measures of Contrast Sensitivity Functions , 1988, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[8]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  THE DESIGN OF A NEW LETTER CHART FOR MEASURING CONTRAST SENSITIVITY , 1988 .

[9]  T Kohnen,et al.  Measuring vision in refractive surgery. , 2001, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[10]  A. Hill,et al.  Vistech VCTS 6500 Charts—Within- and Between-Session Reliability , 1991, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[11]  J. Sparrow,et al.  Use of vision tests in clinical decision making about cataract surgery: results of a national survey , 2000, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[12]  A. El Maghraby,et al.  Comparison of iris-fixed Artisan lens implantation with excimer laser in situ keratomileusis in correcting myopia between -9.00 and -19.50 diopters: a randomized study. , 2002, Ophthalmology.

[13]  J. Werner,et al.  Effect of cataract surgery on contrast sensitivity and glare in patients with 20/50 or better Snellen acuity , 1994, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[14]  S. McLeod,et al.  Beyond snellen acuity: the assessment of visual function after refractive surgery. , 2001, Archives of ophthalmology.

[15]  J. Chen,et al.  Comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy to correct myopia from -1.25 to -6.00 diopters. , 1997, Journal of refractive surgery.

[16]  A. Ginsburg,et al.  Contrast sensitivity under photopic conditions in the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy (PERK) Study. , 1990, Refractive & corneal surgery.

[17]  David Whitaker,et al.  Clinical contrast sensitivity chart evaluation , 1992, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[18]  M. Raizman,et al.  One-year results of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for low to moderate myopia. , 1994, Archives of ophthalmology.

[19]  A Arditi,et al.  On the statistical reliability of letter-chart visual acuity measurements. , 1993, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[20]  Assessment of the Vistech contrast sensitivity test for repeated-measures applications. , 1990 .

[21]  W N Charman,et al.  Choice of spatial frequency for contrast sensitivity evaluation after corneal refractive surgery. , 2001, Journal of refractive surgery.

[22]  A. Smith.  Criteria for cataract surgery: the role of visual acuity and visual function , 1999, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[23]  R. Superstein,et al.  Functional complaints, visual acuity, spatial contrast sensitivity, and glare disability in preoperative and postoperative cataract patients. , 1999, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[24]  S. Mutyala,et al.  Contrast sensitivity evaluation after laser in situ keratomileusis. , 2000, Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.).

[25]  R. Krueger,et al.  Role of clearance and treatment zones in contrast sensitivity: significance in refractive surgery. , 1999, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[26]  A P Ginsburg,et al.  A New Contrast Sensitivity Vision Test Chart , 1984, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[27]  P. King-Smith,et al.  Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: Theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation , 1994, Vision Research.

[28]  J. Salonen,et al.  Contrast sensitivity in different types of early lens opacities. , 2009, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[29]  Theo Seiler,et al.  Clinical results of wavefront‐guided laser in situ keratomileusis 3 months after surgery , 2001, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[30]  M. Vetrugno,et al.  Contrast sensitivity measured by 2 methods after photorefractive keratectomy , 2000, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[31]  P. Hartmann,et al.  Glare sensitivity and visual acuity after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for myopia , 1997, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[32]  Three Clinical Tests of the Spatial Contrast Sensitivity Function: A Comparison , 1986, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[33]  W. Hodge,et al.  Laser vision correction for low hyperopia. An 18-month assessment of safety and efficacy. , 1998 .

[34]  K. Pesudovs,et al.  Assessment of visual function in cataract patients with a mean visual acuity of 6/9. , 1996, Australian and New Zealand journal of ophthalmology.

[35]  D. Evans,et al.  Test-retest reliability of the CSV-1000 contrast test and its relationship to glaucoma therapy. , 1994, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[36]  Corneal irregular astigmatism and contrast sensitivity after photorefractive keratectomy. , 2001, Ophthalmology.

[37]  M. D. Olson,et al.  Visual performance after photorefractive keratectomy with a 6-mm ablation zone. , 1999, American journal of ophthalmology.

[38]  T. Seiler,et al.  Ocular optical aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy for myopia and myopic astigmatism. , 2000, Archives of ophthalmology.

[39]  W. Charman,et al.  Mesopic contrast sensitivity function after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. , 2002, Journal of refractive surgery.

[40]  R. Superstein,et al.  Glare disability and contrast sensitivity before and after cataract surgery , 1997, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[41]  R. D. Stulting,et al.  A Multicenter Trial of Photorefracti*ve Keratectomy for Residual Myopia after Previous Ocular Surgery , 1995 .

[42]  Visual function before and after photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. , 1994, Journal of refractive and corneal surgery.

[43]  Bruce P. Rosenthal,et al.  Functional assessment of low vision , 1996 .

[44]  R. D. Stulting,et al.  Contrast sensitivity and glare disability after radial keratotomy and photorefractive keratectomy. , 1998, Archives of ophthalmology.

[45]  G O Waring,et al.  Results of phase III excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. The Summit PRK Study Group. , 1997, Ophthalmology.

[46]  D Williams,et al.  Visual benefit of correcting higher order aberrations of the eye. , 2000, Journal of refractive surgery.

[47]  G. Rubin.  RELIABILITY AND SENSITIVITY OF CLINICAL CONTRAST SENSITIVITY TESTS , 1988 .

[48]  J. Holladay,et al.  Functional vision and corneal changes after laser in situ keratomileusis determined by contrast sensitivity, glare testing, and corneal topography. , 1999, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[49]  G. Silvestri,et al.  Improvements in Measures of Vision and Self-Reported Visual Function After Cataract Extraction in Patients with Late-Stage Age-Related Maculopathy , 2001, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[50]  Assessment of the Vistech Contrast Sensitivity Test for Repeated‐Measures Applications , 1990, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[51]  Manuel B. Datiles III,et al.  Contrast and glare sensitivity. Association with the type and severity of the cataract. , 1992, Ophthalmology.

[52]  P T de Jong,et al.  Intraocular light scattering in age-related cataracts. , 1992, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[53]  A. Harris,et al.  Contrast sensitivity loss is coupled with capillary dropout in patients with diabetes. , 1997, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[54]  S. Kaushal,et al.  Is cataract surgery justified in patients with age related macular degeneration? A visual function and quality of life assessment , 2000, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[55]  R. D. Stulting,et al.  Videokeratography after excimer laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia. , 2000, Ophthalmology.

[56]  J. Frantz,et al.  Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy in high myopia. A multicenter study. , 1992, Archives of ophthalmology.

[57]  A E Patla,et al.  Improvements in Clinical and Functional Vision and Quality of Life after Second Eye Cataract Surgery , 2000, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[58]  M. Bullimore,et al.  Assessing the reliability, discriminative ability, and validity of disability glare tests. , 1993, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[59]  Alan Sugar,et al.  Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and astigmatism: safety and efficacy: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. , 2002, Ophthalmology.

[60]  F. Sabates,et al.  Excimer photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. , 1993, Ophthalmology.

[61]  Excimer laser retreatment of residual myopia following photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy for compound myopic astigmatism. , 2000, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[62]  S. McKee,et al.  Statistical properties of forced-choice psychometric functions: Implications of probit analysis , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[63]  M A Bullimore,et al.  Improvements in clinical and functional vision and perceived visual disability after first and second eye cataract surgery , 1997, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[64]  M. Lawless.  Refining visual quality assessment in refractive surgery. , 1999, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[65]  G. Rubin,et al.  Comparison of acuity, contrast sensitivity, and disability glare before and after cataract surgery. , 1993, Archives of ophthalmology.

[66]  J. Alió,et al.  Contrast sensitivity after laser in situ keratomileusis , 1998, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[67]  Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia and astigmatism. American Academy of Ophthalmology. , 1999, Ophthalmology.

[68]  J. Marshall,et al.  Hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy with the erodible mask and Axicon system: two year follow‐up , 2000, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.