Requirements management: an enabler for concurrent engineering in the automotive industry

Defining and agreeing the product requirements is especially important when the design and manufacture of a system is part of an Extended Enterprise. To realize an all-inclusive concurrent engineering process, tools for the upstream design activities are needed. In practice, it is often difficult for the companies to have a shared understanding of what needs to be developed, and so specifications contain ambiguities in describing the product requirements. This paper clarifies the problem domain in the context of a complex product, designed and manufactured in a pan-national Extended Enterprise and serving a highly competitive market. The authors show how the challenge can be addressed through the application of ontology. A model of a requirements-management tool is proposed that will allow the various systems and associated levels of a product to be described and then shared through the supply chain. A prototype system is presented and illustrated through a case study from the automotive industry.

[1]  N. F. Noy,et al.  Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology , 2001 .

[2]  Mitsuo Nagamachi,et al.  Supplier involvement in automotive component design: are there really large US Japan differences? , 1996 .

[3]  Kristin A. Farry,et al.  Customer Centered Products: Creating Successful Products Through Smart Requirements Management (Продукты для клиента: создание успешных продуктов с помощью грамотного управления требованиями) , 2000 .

[4]  Seungwha Chung,et al.  Performance effects of partnership between manufacturers and suppliers for new product development: the supplier's standpoint , 2003 .

[5]  Graeme Holmes Putting Concurrent Engineering into Practice , 1994 .

[6]  W. Ouchi,et al.  JAPANESE-STYLE PARTNERSHIPS -- GIVING COMPANIES A COMPETITIVE EDGE. , 1993 .

[7]  Timothy W. Finin,et al.  Enabling Technology for Knowledge Sharing , 1991, AI Mag..

[8]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[9]  Jesualdo Tomás Fernández-Breis,et al.  A cooperative tool for facilitating knowledge management , 2000 .

[10]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  ENUMERATING THE COMPONENT SPACE: FIRST STEPS TOWARD A DESIGN NAMING CONVENTION FOR MECHANICAL PARTS , 2003 .

[11]  Mark R. Cutkosky,et al.  SHARE: A Methodology and Environment for Collaborative Product Development , 1994, Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst..

[12]  Anjo Anjewierden,et al.  The KACTUS View on the 'O' word , 1995, IJCAI 1995.

[13]  Hans L Johannesson,et al.  Computer modelling of design specifications , 2000 .

[14]  Jesualdo Tomás Fernández-Breis,et al.  A cooperative framework for integrating ontologies , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[15]  Hans L Johannesson,et al.  A Product and Process Model Supporting Main and Sub-supplier Collaboration , 2001 .

[16]  Shuang Song,et al.  IDENTIFYING SHARED UNDERSTANDING IN DESIGN USING DOCUMENT ANALYSIS , 2001 .

[17]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A translation approach to portable ontology specifications , 1993, Knowl. Acquis..

[18]  Silvio Roberto Ignácio Pires,et al.  Outsourcing in the automotive industry: From JIT to Modular Consortia , 1997 .

[19]  Vassilis Agouridas,et al.  Methods and Tools for Requirements Engineering of Made-to-Order Mechanical Products , 2002 .

[20]  Gregory R. Olsen,et al.  An Ontology for Engineering Mathematics , 1994, KR.

[21]  Rajkumar Roy,et al.  A Product Ontology for Automotive Seat Specification , 2004, DAC 2004.

[22]  Klas Eric Soderquist,et al.  Lean supply and price-based global sourcing — the interconnection , 2001 .

[23]  Balakrishnan Chandrasekaran,et al.  What are ontologies, and why do we need them? , 1999, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[24]  Staffan Sunnersjö,et al.  Requirement-Driven Design Processes With Integrated Knowledge Structures , 2003 .

[25]  S. Sengupta,et al.  Organizing Successful Co-Marketing Alliances , 1993 .

[26]  K. Clark Project scope and project performance: the effect of parts strategy and supplier involvement on product development , 1989 .

[27]  M A Musen,et al.  Domain Ontologies in Software Engineering: Use of Protégé with the EON Architecture , 1998, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[28]  Lawrence D. Pohlmann,et al.  Customer‐Centered Products – Creating Successful Products through Smart Requirements Management , 2001 .

[29]  Sándor Vajna,et al.  Relationship Between Process and Product Structures: A New and Flexible Approach for an Integrated Dynamic Process Management , 2002 .

[30]  Mike Uschold,et al.  A Framework for Understanding and Classifying Ontology Applications , 1999 .