Demonstrating professional intersubjectivity: The instructor's work in simulator-based learning environments

Abstract Maritime traffic, like most traffic, is rule-governed. In situations in which multiple vessels traffic the same waters, anti-collision regulations enable bridge teams to coordinate their actions with those of other vessels. In maritime education, simulators provide a safe environment for students to begin practicing the application of anti-collision regulations to different traffic situations. This study explores how aspects of rule appliance, analytically understood as professional vision and professional intersubjectivity, are trained in a simulator environment by analyses of a video-recorded episode from a navigation course. The results show how instructions during the scenario are continuous achievements that build on an instructor's ability to recognize the fit between learning objectives and on-going activities in the simulator as they unfold. These embedded assessments and their subsequent demonstrations draw on several social and material resources in the simulator environment. In the simulator, the instructor demonstrates the rule system as a dialogical practice where one interprets each other in line with the rules in negotiations between vessels. This interpretation requires a level of professional intersubjectivity that goes beyond merely following rules, towards seeing oneself through the eyes of others with regard to the intentions projected in one's manoeuvring actions.

[1]  Patricia Reynolds,et al.  Exhibiting understanding: The body in apprenticeship , 2011 .

[2]  Christian Greiffenhagen,et al.  Making rounds: The routine work of the teacher during collaborative learning with computers , 2012, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[3]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions , 2006 .

[4]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[5]  Sten R. Ludvigsen,et al.  Analyzing students' interaction with a 3D geometry learning tool and their teacher , 2012 .

[6]  Oskar Lindwall,et al.  The sequential analysis of instruction , 2015 .

[7]  W. Sharrock,et al.  Do the right thing! Rule finitism, rule scepticism and rule following , 1999 .

[8]  R. Glavin,et al.  Low‐ to high‐fidelity simulation – a continuum of medical education? , 2003, Medical education.

[9]  James D. Hollan,et al.  Hands as molecules: Representational gestures used for developing theory in a scientific laboratory , 2005 .

[10]  Jon Hindmarsh,et al.  Video in Qualitative Research: Analysing Social Interaction in Everyday Life , 2010 .

[11]  P. Renshaw The social cultural and emotional dimensions of scaffolding , 2013 .

[12]  P. Belcher A sociological interpretation of the COLREGS , 2002, Journal of Navigation.

[13]  E. Hutchins Enaction, imagination, and insight , 2007 .

[14]  Ed Elbers,et al.  Scaffolding student learning: A micro-analysis of teacher–student interaction , 2013 .

[15]  William Housley,et al.  Navigation, Interaction and Bridge Team Work , 2006 .

[16]  E. Hutchins Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[17]  Magnus Hontvedt,et al.  Professional vision in simulated environments — Examining professional maritime pilots' performance of work tasks in a full-mission ship simulator , 2015 .

[18]  Donald H. Taylor,et al.  Rules and Regulations in Maritime Collision Avoidance: New Directions for Bridge Team Training , 1998, Journal of Navigation.

[19]  H. Mehan ‘What time is it, Denise?”: Asking known information questions in classroom discourse , 1979 .