A Simulation-optimization Approach to Air Warfare Planning

How can computer-aided planning systems deal with the complexities, uncertainties, and rapidly shifting information needed to support air warfare operational planning? This paper uses a hierarchical decomposition of decision-making, coupled to a predictive simulation model that estimates the probability distribution of the outcomes of candidate operational plans. The approach will generate, evaluate, and improve Blue plans while assuming that Red intelligently reallocates its forces, using stochastic optimization, to counter Blue's moves. Evaluation of each Blue plan is accomplished via a Stochastic Evaluator that draws multiple samples of potential outcomes and Red force levels for a given Blue force structure and combined target composition. The evaluation metric is the net discounted value from enemy targets hit. Linear programming heuristics and simulation generate Red's adaptively optimized responses, outcomes, and inferred relative marginal force values. The results of this two-player, multi-level simulation-optimization approach for operational planning and decision-making demonstrate that automated plan optimization and embedding of optimization algorithms into an operational planning cycle operating over a multi-period conflict can be made practical for current computers by hierarchical decomposition of planning and on-line decision and optimization problems into computationally practical tasks.

[1]  Douglas A. Popken,et al.  Model identification and optimization for operational simulation , 2003, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[2]  Alex F. Sisti,et al.  Enabling Technologies for Simulation Science VII , 2003 .

[3]  Timothy E. Busch,et al.  Modeling of air operations for course-of-action determination , 2002, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[4]  Lee W. Schruben,et al.  A survey of simulation optimization techniques and procedures , 2000, 2000 Winter Simulation Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37165).

[5]  Alan R. Washburn,et al.  The LP/POMDP marriage: Optimization with imperfect information , 2000 .

[6]  Boris Stilman,et al.  LG-ANALYST: linguistic geometry for master air attack planning , 2003, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[7]  A. F. Sisti Enabling technologies for simulation science , 1998, 1998 IEEE Information Technology Conference, Information Environment for the Future (Cat. No.98EX228).

[8]  John M. D. Hill,et al.  Concept-Level Anticipatory Planning , 2002 .

[9]  Michail G. Lagoudakis,et al.  Value Function Approximation in Zero-Sum Markov Games , 2002, UAI.

[10]  M. Dresher The Mathematics of Games of Strategy: Theory and Applications , 1981 .

[11]  Philip M. Morse The Operations Research Society of America , 1952, Oper. Res..

[12]  J. B. Cruz,et al.  Moving horizon Nash strategies for a military air operation , 2002 .

[13]  Enver Yücesan,et al.  Global Optimization Performance Measures for Generalized Hill Climbing Algorithms , 2004, J. Glob. Optim..

[14]  Namrata Vaswani Bound on errors in particle filtering with incorrect model assumptions and its implication for change detection , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[15]  K. Ito,et al.  Stochastic games and inverse Lyapunov methods in air operations , 2000, Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.00CH37187).

[16]  H. S. Morse,et al.  The DARPA JFACC program: modeling and control of military operations , 2000, Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.00CH37187).

[17]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  Rollout Algorithms for Combinatorial Optimization , 1997, J. Heuristics.

[18]  Accelerated randomized stochastic optimization , 2003 .

[19]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  FOX-GA: A Genetic Algorithm for Generating and Analyzing Battlefield Courses of Action , 1999, Evolutionary Computation.

[20]  Timothy E. Busch,et al.  Theoretical underpinnings of predictive battlespace awareness , 2003, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[21]  Udo W. Pooch,et al.  Simulations Technologies in the Mission Operational Environment , 2000, Simul..

[22]  W.M. McEneaney,et al.  Stochastic game approach to air operations , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[23]  Richard Hillestad,et al.  Experiments in Variable-Resolution Combat Modeling , 1940 .

[24]  Louis R. Moore,et al.  The Theater-Level Campaign Model: A Research Prototype for a New Generation of Combat Analysis Model , 1997 .

[25]  Samuel Karlin,et al.  Mathematical Methods and Theory in Games, Programming, and Economics , 1961 .

[26]  Douglas A. Popken,et al.  An Investigation of System Identification Techniques for Simulation Model Abstraction , 2000 .

[27]  Paul K. Davis,et al.  Meta models to aid planning of intelligent machines , 2001 .

[28]  Lowell Bruce Anderson,et al.  COMBAT: a Computer Program to Investigate Aimed Fire Attrition Equations, Allocations of Fire, and the Calculation of Weapons Scores (CD-ROM) , 1989 .

[29]  C. J. Ancker,et al.  A proposed foundation for a theory of combat , 1995 .

[30]  I. Tunay,et al.  Game-theoretic linear quadratic method for air mission control , 2000, Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.00CH37187).

[31]  Christos G. Cassandras,et al.  A receding horizon approach for dynamic UAV mission management , 2003, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.