Relative positioning of variational part models for design analysis

Abstract A collection of functionally oriented assembly relations serves as an implicit representation for part positions in an assembly. The actual determination of part positions from the assembly relations has been extensively researched for assemblies in which parts are at their nominal shapes and sizes. However, design-analysis algorithms such as those used in tolerance analysis require the determination of the final assembly configuration, where the individual part geometries incorporate simulated manufacturing variations. The paper describes a constrained-optimization technique for the determination of part positions in assemblies of nonideal parts. Because the manufacturing variations are relatively small, the authors' technique linearizes the rotational elements in the constraint formulation. The constraint-optimization formulation seeks to satisfy the assembly relations to the maximum extent possible that is consistent with their relative functional significance. Noninterference constraints between the mating parts are enforced.

[1]  Joshua U. Turner Relative positioning of parts in assemblies using mathematical programming , 1990, Comput. Aided Des..

[2]  Alan Fleming,et al.  Geometric Relationships Between Toleranced Features , 1988, Artif. Intell..

[3]  Alan Fleming Analysis of Uncertainties in a Structure of Parts , 1985, IJCAI.

[4]  J.U. Turner,et al.  Constraint representation and reduction in assembly modeling and analysis , 1992, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[5]  Ann Patricia Fothergill,et al.  An Interpreter for a Language for Describing Assemblies , 1980, Artif. Intell..

[6]  Ann Patricia Fothergill,et al.  Reasoning About the Spatial Relationships Derived From a RAPT Program for Describing Assembly by a Robot , 1983, IJCAI.

[7]  Kunwoo Lee,et al.  Inference of the positions of components in an assembly: part 2 , 1985 .

[8]  Frederick S. Hillier,et al.  Introduction of Operations Research , 1967 .

[9]  Jarek Rossignac,et al.  Constraints in constructive solid geometry , 1987, I3D '86.

[10]  Ann Patricia Fothergill,et al.  Inferring the Positions of Bodies from Specified Spatial Relationships , 1974, Artif. Intell..

[11]  R. Paul Robot manipulators : mathematics, programming, and control : the computer control of robot manipulators , 1981 .

[12]  Masatomo Inui,et al.  Algebraic reasoning of position uncertainties of parts in an assembly , 1991, SMA '91.

[13]  Glen Mullineux Optimization scheme for assembling components , 1987 .

[14]  Kunwoo Lee,et al.  An assembly modelling system for dynamic and kinematic analysis , 1989 .

[15]  J. U. Turner A Feasibility Space Approach for Automated Tolerancing , 1993 .

[16]  Joshua U. Turner,et al.  Variational solid modeling for tolerance analysis , 1993, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[17]  David N. Rocheleau,et al.  System for interactive assembly modelling , 1987 .

[18]  Robin J. Popplestone,et al.  RAPT, A Language for Describing Assemblies , 1978 .