Effectiveness of vocational rehabilitation intervention on the return to work and employment of persons with multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND Multiple sclerosis is a neurological disease that frequently affects adults of working age, resulting in a range of physical, cognitive and psychosocial deficits that impact on workforce participation. Although, the literature supports vocational rehabilitation (VR) approaches in persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS), the evidence for its effectiveness is yet to be established. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effectiveness of VR programs compared to alternative programs or care as usual on return to work, workability and employment in pwMS; to evaluate the cost effectiveness of these programs. SEARCH STRATEGY Electronic searches included: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials "CENTRAL" 2008 issue 3, MEDLINE (PubMed) (1966- 2008), EMBASE (1988- 2008), CINAHL (1982- 2008), PEDro (1990- 2008), the Cochrane Rehabilitation and Related Therapies Field trials Register and the National Health Service National Research Register. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomized and controlled clinical trials, including before - after controlled trials, that compare VR rehabilitation with alternative intervention such as standard or a lesser form of intervention or waitlist controls. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two reviewers selected trials and rated their methodological quality independently. A 'best evidence' synthesis was performed, based on methodological quality. Trials were grouped in terms of type and setting of VR programs. MAIN RESULTS Two trials (one RCT and one CCT) (total 80 participants) met the review criteria. Both trials scored poorly on the methodological quality assessment. There was 'insufficient evidence' for VR programs for (a)'competitive employment', in altering rates of job retention, changes in employment, improvement in rates of re-entry into the labour force; (b) for altering 'work ability' by improving participants' confidence in the accommodation request process, or employability maturity or job seeking activity. No evidence could be assimilated for changes in proportions of persons in supported employment or on disability pensions, nor for cost-effectiveness. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There was inconclusive evidence to support VR for pwMS. However, the review highlights some of the challenges in providing VR for pwMS. Clinicians need to be aware of vocational issues, and to understand and manage barriers for maintaining employment. Proactive and timely VR programs should incorporate practical solutions to deal with work disability, workplace accommodation and educate employers, and the wider community. Liaison with policy makers is imperative for government initiatives that encourage work focused VR programs. Future research in VR should focus on improving methodological and scientific rigour of clinical trials; on the development of appropriate and valid outcome measures; and on cost effectiveness of VR programs.

[1]  D. Wade,et al.  Multi-disciplinary rehabilitation for acquired brain injury in adults of working age. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[2]  Taking part in life: enhancing participation in multiple sclerosis. , 2005, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.

[3]  P. Arnett,et al.  Factors related to employment status changes in individuals with multiple sclerosis , 2005, Multiple sclerosis.

[4]  J. Benito-León,et al.  A systematic approach to analyse health-related quality of life in multiple sclerosis: the GEDMA study , 2004, Multiple sclerosis.

[5]  S. Mellgren,et al.  Multivariate analyses of factors associated with unemployment in people with multiple sclerosis. , 1990, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[6]  J. Hobson Is Work Good for Your Health and Well-Being? , 2007 .

[7]  N. Larocca,et al.  A program to facilitate retention of employment among persons with multiple sclerosis. , 1996, Work.

[8]  I. Dyck,et al.  Hidden geographies: the changing lifeworlds of women with multiple sclerosis. , 1995, Social science & medicine.

[9]  George Davey Smith,et al.  meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies , 1998 .

[10]  Bryan G. Cook,et al.  Improving career re-entry outcomes for people with multiple sclerosis: a comparison of two approaches , 1998 .

[11]  A. Riazi,et al.  Vocational rehabilitation services for people with multiple sclerosis: what patients want from clinicians and employers , 2007, Multiple sclerosis.

[12]  Lynne Turner-Stokes,et al.  Vocational assessment and rehabilitation after acquired brain injury: Inter-agency Guidelines , 2004 .

[13]  G. Bond,et al.  Vocational rehabilitation for people with severe mental illness. , 2001, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[14]  L Turner-Stokes,et al.  Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for adults with multiple sclerosis. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[15]  A. Chamberlain,et al.  Factors determining job retention and return to work for disabled employees: a questionnaire study of opinions of disabled people's organizations in the UK. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[16]  N. Larocca,et al.  Factors associated with unemployment of patients with multiple sclerosis. , 1985, Journal of chronic diseases.

[17]  S. Poser,et al.  [Early retirement and occupational rehabilitation of patients with multiple sclerosis]. , 1993, Die Rehabilitation.

[18]  K. Aronson Quality of Life Among Persons with Multiple Sclerosis and their Caregivers , 1997, Neurology.

[19]  M. F. Jackson,et al.  Effects of multiple sclerosis on occupational and career patterns. , 1991, Axone.

[20]  P. Rumrill,et al.  Career adjustment via reasonable accommodations: the effects of an employee-empowerment intervention for people with disabilities. , 1997, Work.

[21]  R. Paul,et al.  Demographic, Clinical, and Cognitive Characteristics of Multiple Sclerosis Patients Who Continue to Work , 1995 .

[22]  Julie F Pallant,et al.  Use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to identify preliminary comprehensive and brief core sets for multiple sclerosis , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation.

[23]  B. Mcmahon,et al.  Progression of disability benefits: A perspective on multiple sclerosis , 2003 .

[24]  Kurt L. Johnson,et al.  Medical, Pyschological, Social, and Programmatic Barriers to Employment for People with Multiple Sclerosis , 2004 .

[25]  S. Brophy,et al.  Interventions for latent autoimmune diabetes (LADA) in adults. , 2011, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[26]  F. Khan,et al.  Use of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to describe patient-reported disability in multiple sclerosis and identification of relevant environmental factors. , 2007, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[27]  P. Gøtzsche Reference bias in reports of drug trials. , 1987, British medical journal.

[28]  C. Brand,et al.  Caregiver strain and factors associated with caregiver self-efficacy and quality of life in a community cohort with multiple sclerosis , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation.

[29]  Andrea Furlan,et al.  Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group , 2003, Spine.

[30]  C. Chan,et al.  Factors affecting vocational outcomes of people with chronic illness participating in a supported competitive open employment program in Hong Kong. , 2005, Work.

[31]  R. Roessler,et al.  Chronic illness and return to work: a social cognitive perspective. , 1997, Work.

[32]  D. Silberberg,et al.  New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines for research protocols , 1983, Annals of neurology.

[33]  H M Baum,et al.  Employment in individuals with multiple sclerosis , 1986, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[34]  M. Catanzaro,et al.  Economic status of families living with multiple sclerosis , 1992, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[35]  L. Doyle,et al.  Magnesium sulphate prior to preterm birth for neuroprotection of the fetus , 2004 .

[36]  R. Schilling,et al.  Occupational health practice , 1973 .