Diagnosis of cyber and non-physical bullying victimization: A lifestyles and routine activities theory approach to constructing effective preventative measures

Abstract Cyberbullying is a global phenomenon brought by the proliferation of digital technology and social networking sites (SNS). Defined as intentional and repeated harm via technology, cyberbullying has provided youth with another medium to experience bullying victimization. The purpose of this study is to examine both cyber and non-physical bullying victimization using Cohen, Kluegel, and Land's (1981) Lifestyles and Routine Activities Theory. Data were derived from the 2013 school crime supplement of the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) for delineating the pattern of cyber and non-physical bullying victimization. This study indicates that cyber and non-physical bullying victimization have similarities and differences reflecting lifestyle and routine activity factors. Youth who had illicit access to alcohol and drugs, used alcohol or drugs at school, and had an affiliation with gang membership involving violence, were more likely to be exposed to potential offenders for both cyberbullying and non-physical bullying victimization. Moreover, while involvement in the performing arts made youth more vulnerable to victimization, youth who followed school rules and were given teacher care were less likely to be targeted. In closing, the study offers effective preventive measures against both cyber and non-physical youth bullying activities.

[1]  J. Mitchell Miller,et al.  Trouble in the School Yard: a Study of the Risk Factors of Victimization at School , 2003 .

[2]  Robert J. Sampson,et al.  Deviant Lifestyles, Proximity to Crime, and the Offender-Victim Link in Personal Violence , 1990 .

[3]  Pekka Räsänen,et al.  Do routine activities help predict young adults’ online harassment: A multi-nation study , 2017 .

[4]  Aynur Bütün Ayhan,et al.  An examination of the predictive factors of cyberbullying in adolescents , 2017 .

[5]  Terance D. Miethe,et al.  Crime and its social context : toward an integrated theory of offenders, victims, and situations , 1995 .

[6]  Ramani S. Pilla,et al.  Bullying Behaviors Among US Youth: Prevalence and Association With Psychosocial Adjustment , 2001 .

[7]  Christopher J. Schreck,et al.  Specifying the Influence of Family and Peers on Violent Victimization , 2004, Journal of interpersonal violence.

[8]  Gary King,et al.  Logistic Regression in Rare Events Data , 2001, Political Analysis.

[9]  Marcus Felson,et al.  Crime and Everyday Life: Insights and Implications for Society , 1994 .

[10]  Ryan C. Meldrum,et al.  Traditional Bullying, Cyber Bullying, and Deviance: A General Strain Theory Approach , 2010 .

[11]  James R. Kluegel,et al.  Social Inequality and Predatory Criminal Victimization: An Exposition and Test of a Formal Theory , 1981 .

[12]  Lifestyles/Routine Activities and Bullying among South Korean Youths , 2016 .

[13]  Tim Field,et al.  Bullycide: Death at Playtime , 2000 .

[14]  Michael Arntfield,et al.  Towards a Cybervictimology: Cyberbullying, Routine Activities Theory, and the Anti-Sociality of Social Media , 2015 .

[15]  Kyung-shick Choi,et al.  Mobile Phone Technology and Online Sexual Harassment among Juveniles in South Korea: Effects of Self-control and Social Learning , 2017 .

[16]  D. Olweus Aggression in the schools : bullies and whipping boys , 1978 .

[17]  S Greenland,et al.  Problems due to small samples and sparse data in conditional logistic regression analysis. , 2000, American journal of epidemiology.

[18]  Shelley Keith,et al.  Analyzing Predictors of Bullying Victimization With Routine Activity and Social Bond Perspectives , 2019, Journal of interpersonal violence.

[19]  Terance D. Miethe,et al.  Opportunity, Choice, and Criminal Victimization: A Test of a Theoretical Model , 1990 .

[20]  Terance D. Miethe,et al.  Understanding Theories of Criminal Victimization , 1993, Crime and Justice.

[21]  Lawrence E. Cohen,et al.  Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach , 1979 .

[22]  Richard Tewksbury,et al.  PREDICTING RISKS OF LARCENY THEFT VICTIMIZATION: A ROUTINE ACTIVITY ANALYSIS USING REFINED LIFESTYLE MEASURES , 1998 .

[23]  Richard Tewksbury,et al.  Sexual Assault of College Women: A Feminist Interpretation of a Routine Activities Analysis , 2002 .

[24]  Justin W. Patchin,et al.  Bullies Move Beyond the Schoolyard , 2006 .

[25]  Justin W. Patchin,et al.  Bullying Beyond the Schoolyard: Preventing and Responding to Cyberbullying , 2008 .

[26]  Kyung-shick Choi,et al.  Demographic variables and risk factors in computer-crime: an empirical assessment , 2015, Cluster Computing.

[27]  Michael R. Gottfredson,et al.  Victims of Personal Crime: An Empirical Foundation for a Theory of Personal Victimization , 1977 .

[28]  T. Holt,et al.  Predicting Online Harassment Victimization Among a Juvenile Population , 2012 .

[29]  Kyung-shick Choi,et al.  Applying the Lifestyle Routine Activities Theory to Understand Physical and Nonphysical Peer Victimization , 2017 .

[30]  Jack R. Greene,et al.  SCHOOL DISORDER: THE INFLUENCE OF INDIVIDUAL, INSTITUTIONAL, AND COMMUNITY FACTORS* , 1999 .

[31]  J. Wooldredge,et al.  Lifestyles, Informal Controls, and Youth Victimization Risk in South Korea and the United States , 2018 .

[32]  Grace Chee,et al.  Assessing the Risk Factors of Cyber and Mobile Phone Bullying Victimization in a Nationally Representative Sample of Singapore Youth , 2016, International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology.

[33]  Kyung-shick Choi Computer Crime Victimization and Integrated Theory: An Empirical Assessment , 2008 .

[34]  Ann Marie Popp The Effects of Exposure, Proximity, and Capable Guardians on the Risk of Bullying Victimization , 2012 .

[35]  Kyung-shick Choi,et al.  Theoretical analysis of cyber-interpersonal violence victimization and offending using cyber-routine activities theory , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[36]  Gary F. Jensen,et al.  Gender, Lifestyles, and Victimization: Beyond Routine Activity , 1986, Violence and Victims.

[37]  Manuel Castells,et al.  The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society , 2001 .

[38]  J. Mulligan,et al.  Bullying in school: are short pupils at risk? Questionnaire study in a cohort , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.