Mutualism versus Independence: Strategies of Mixed-Species Oral Biofilms In Vitro Using Saliva as the Sole Nutrient Source

ABSTRACT During initial dental plaque formation, the ability of a species to grow when others cannot would be advantageous, and enhanced growth through interspecies and intergeneric cooperation could be critical. These characteristics were investigated in three coaggregating early colonizers of the tooth surface (Streptococcus gordoniiDL1, Streptococcus oralis 34, and Actinomyces naeslundii T14V). Area coverage and cell cluster size measurements showed that attachment of A. naeslundii and of S. gordonii to glass flowcells was enhanced by a salivary conditioning film, whereas attachment of S. oralis was hindered. Growth experiments using saliva as the sole carbon and nitrogen source showed that A. naeslundii was unable to grow either in planktonic culture or as a biofilm, whereas S. gordonii grew under both conditions. S. oralis grew planktonically, but to a much lower maximum cell density than did S. gordonii;S. oralis did not grow reproducibly as a biofilm. Thus, only S. gordonii possessed all traits advantageous for growth as a solitary and independent resident of the tooth. Two-species biofilm experiments analyzed by laser confocal microscopy showed that neither S. oralis nor A. naeslundii grew when coaggregated pairwise with S. gordonii. However, both S. oralis and A. naeslundii showed luxuriant, interdigitated growth when paired together in coaggregated microcolonies. Thus, the S. oralis-A. naeslundiipair formed a mutualistic relationship, potentially contact dependent, that allows each to grow where neither could survive alone. S. gordonii, in contrast, neither was hindered by nor benefited from the presence of either of the other strains. The formation of mutually beneficial interactions within the developing biofilm may be essential for certain initial colonizers to be retained during early plaque development, whereas other initial colonizers may be unaffected by neighboring cells on the substratum.

[1]  R. Palmer,et al.  Spatial organization of oral bacteria in biofilms. , 1999, Methods in enzymology.

[2]  P. Kolenbrander,et al.  Effect of saliva on coaggregation of oral Actinomyces and Streptococcus species , 1984, Infection and immunity.

[3]  D. Beighton,et al.  Growth of Viridans Streptococci on Human Serum α1-Acid Glycoprotein , 1999 .

[4]  N. Pace A molecular view of microbial diversity and the biosphere. , 1997, Science.

[5]  S. Molin,et al.  Development and Dynamics of Pseudomonassp. Biofilms , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.

[6]  S. Molin,et al.  Spatial Organization of Microbial Biofilm Communities , 2000, Microbial Ecology.

[7]  B. Bassler How bacteria talk to each other: regulation of gene expression by quorum sensing. , 1999, Current opinion in microbiology.

[8]  J. S. van der Hoeven,et al.  Growth of oral Streptococcus species and Actinomyces viscosus in human saliva , 1984, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[9]  J. S. van der Hoeven,et al.  The Growth of Oral Bacteria on Saliva , 1987, Journal of dental research.

[10]  J. Cisar,et al.  Immunochemical and functional studies of Actinomyces viscosus T14V type 1 fimbriae with monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies directed against the fimbrial subunit. , 1991, Journal of general microbiology.

[11]  M. Levine,et al.  Pellicle receptors for Actinomyces viscosus type 1 fimbriae in vitro , 1989, Infection and immunity.

[12]  D. Kaiser,et al.  How and why myxobacteria talk to each other. , 1998, Current opinion in microbiology.

[13]  S. Molin,et al.  Role of commensal relationships on the spatial structure of a surface-attached microbial consortium. , 2000, Environmental microbiology.

[14]  R. Gibbons,et al.  Interbacterial aggregation of plaque bacteria. , 1970, Archives of oral biology.

[15]  R. Lamont,et al.  Intergeneric Communication in Dental Plaque Biofilms , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.

[16]  F. Scannapieco,et al.  Emergence in Human Dental Plaque and Host Distribution of Amylase-binding Streptococci , 1994, Journal of dental research.

[17]  R. Palmer,et al.  Retrieval of biofilms from the oral cavity. , 2001, Methods in enzymology.

[18]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Co-adhesion of Oral Microbial Pairs under Flow in the Presence of Saliva and Lactose , 1996, Journal of dental research.

[19]  M. Kilian,et al.  Microbiology of the early colonization of human enamel and root surfaces in vivo. , 1987, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[20]  K. Schleifer,et al.  Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. , 1995, Microbiological reviews.

[21]  S. Molin,et al.  Assessment of GFP fluorescence in cells of Streptococcus gordonii under conditions of low pH and low oxygen concentration. , 2001, Microbiology.

[22]  S. Møller,et al.  Impact of nutrient composition on a degradative biofilm community , 1997, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[23]  S. J. Caldwell,et al.  Multicellular Organization in a Degradative Biofilm Community , 1994, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[24]  W E Moore,et al.  The bacteria of periodontal diseases. , 1994, Periodontology 2000.

[25]  P. Kolenbrander,et al.  Identification of Saliva-Regulated Genes of Streptococcus gordonii DL1 by Differential Display Using Random Arbitrarily Primed PCR , 2000, Infection and Immunity.

[26]  S. Socransky,et al.  Comparison of the microbiota of supra- and subgingival plaque in health and periodontitis. , 2000, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[27]  P. Kolenbrander,et al.  Adhere today, here tomorrow: oral bacterial adherence , 1993, Journal of bacteriology.

[28]  W. B. Clark,et al.  Adherence of Actinomyces viscosus T14V and T14AV to Hydroxyapatite Surfaces In Vitro and Human Teeth In Vivo , 1979, Infection and immunity.

[29]  D. Relman,et al.  Bacterial diversity within the human subgingival crevice. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  P. Kolenbrander,et al.  Lactose-reversible coaggregation between oral actinomycetes and Streptococcus sanguis , 1981, Infection and immunity.

[31]  P. Kolenbrander,et al.  Specificity of coaggregation reactions between human oral streptococci and strains of Actinomyces viscosus or Actinomyces naeslundii , 1979, Infection and immunity.

[32]  B. Christensen,et al.  Establishment of New Genetic Traits in a Microbial Biofilm Community , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[33]  R. Palmer,et al.  A flowcell for the study of plaque removal and regrowth , 1995 .

[34]  M. Kilian,et al.  Adhesive Properties of Viridans Streptoccocal Species , 1994 .

[35]  F. Scannapieco,et al.  Prevalence of the Amylase-Binding Protein A Gene (abpA) in Oral Streptococci , 1999, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.