Comparison of four methods for detection of oestrus in dairy cows with resynchronised oestrous cycles.

OBJECTIVE To compare the sensitivity and positive predictive value of four methods for detection of oestrus in dairy cows with resynchronised oestrous cycles. PROCEDURE Oestrous cycles in cows in three herds were synchronised for a first round of artificial insemination (AI) and then resynchronised for a second round of AI. Sensitivity and positive predictive value of four aids (pedometers, radiotelemetric transmitters [HeatWatch; HW], tail-paint and heatmount detectors) that were used to detect the resynchronised oestrus were compared. Milk progesterone concentration and pregnancy testing at 12 weeks were used as the reference standard for cows being in oestrus. RESULTS The mean sensitivity and positive predictive value for detecting the resynchronised oestrus, for each aid that was used, was > 80%. Tail-paint was significantly more sensitive at detecting oestrus compared to heatmount detectors (P = 0.002), but not significantly more sensitive than pedometers (P = 0.07) or HW (P = 0.55) for detecting oestrus (91.3, 85.7; 81.4 and 88.4%, respectively). Positive predictive value of HW for detecting oestrus was greater than tail-paint (P = 0.014) and heatmount detectors (P = 0.024) but not pedometers (P = 0.25; 100, 91.7, 92.9 and 87.5%, respectively). Positive predictive value of heatmount detectors was greater than pedometers in herd C (93.4% vs 73.3%; P = 0.035) but not in herds A (95.0% vs 90.0%; P = 0.56) or B (90.8% vs 100%; P = 0.10). No other significant differences in sensitivity or positive predictive value of detection of oestrus were found between aids. CONCLUSION Tail-paint, heatmount detectors, pedometers and HW provide a high sensitivity (> 80%) and positive predictive value (> 85%) of detecting oestrus in dairy cows with resynchronized oestrous cycles.

[1]  M. McGilliard,et al.  Effectiveness of rump-mounted devices and androgenized females for detection of estrus in dairy cattle. , 1990, Journal of dairy science.

[2]  J. Silcock,et al.  A comparison of three methods of oestrus detection in commercial dairy herds verified by serum progesterone analysis , 1986 .

[3]  I. Politis,et al.  Effects of Staphylococcus aureus toxins on the growth of bovine mammary epithelial cells (MAC-T) in culture. , 1995, Journal of dairy science.

[4]  R Vishwanath,et al.  Estrus detection using radiotelemetry or visual observation and tail painting for dairy cows on pasture. , 1998, Journal of dairy science.

[5]  P. L. Senger,et al.  The estrus detection problem: new concepts, technologies, and possibilities. , 1994, Journal of dairy science.

[6]  Gregory S. Lewis,et al.  Oestrus detection in cattle: recent developments , 1992 .

[7]  K. L. Macmillan,et al.  Role of the sensitivity of detection of oestrus in the submission rate of cows treated to resynchronise oestrus. , 2003, Australian veterinary journal.

[8]  W. Fulkerson,et al.  The accuracy of several aids in detecting oestrus in dairy cattle , 1983 .

[9]  C. Galina,et al.  Factors affecting the reproductive efficiency of artificial insemination programmes in a seasonal breeding pasture-based dairy system with the aid of milk progesterone. , 2001, Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene.

[10]  J. Cavalieri,et al.  Oestrus detection techniques and insemination strategies in Bos indicus heifers synchronised with norgestomet-oestradiol. , 1995, Australian veterinary journal.

[11]  H. L. Barr.  Influence of estrus detection on days open in dairy herds. , 1975, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  D. R. Barnes,et al.  Detecting estrus in synchronized heifers-using tailpaint and an aerosol raddle. , 1988, Theriogenology.

[13]  J. Cavalieri,et al.  Synchronisation of oestrus and reproductive performance of dairy cows following administration of oestradiol benzoate or gonadotrophin releasing hormone during a synchronised pro-oestrus. , 2002, Australian veterinary journal.