How Users, Facility Managers, and Bystanders Perceive and Accept a Navigation Robot for Visually Impaired People in Public Buildings

Autonomous navigation robots have a considerable potential to offer a new form of mobility aid to people with visual impairments. However, to deploy such robots in public buildings, it is imperative to receive acceptance from not only robot users but also people that use the buildings and managers of those facilities. Therefore, we conducted three studies to investigate the acceptance and concerns of our prototype robot, which looks like a regular suitcase. First, an online survey revealed that people could accept the robot navigating blind users. Second, in the interviews with facility managers, they were cautious about the robot’s camera and the privacy of their customers. Finally, focus group sessions with legally blind participants who experienced the robot navigation revealed that the robot may cause trouble when it collides with those who may not be aware of the user’s blindness. Still, many participants liked the design of the robot which assimilated into the surroundings.

[1]  Koushil Sreenath,et al.  Robotic Guide Dog: Leading a Human with Leash-Guided Hybrid Physical Interaction , 2021, 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[2]  Joseph B. Lyons,et al.  Trusting Autonomous Security Robots: The Role of Reliability and Stated Social Intent , 2020, Hum. Factors.

[3]  Sabyasachee Mishra,et al.  Evaluating public acceptance of autonomous delivery robots during COVID-19 pandemic , 2020, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[4]  Apu Kapadia,et al.  Privacy Considerations of the Visually Impaired with Camera Based Assistive Technologies: Misrepresentation, Impropriety, and Fairness , 2020, ASSETS.

[5]  Frode Eika Sandnes,et al.  Tools and Technologies for Blind and Visually Impaired Navigation Support: A Review , 2020, IETE Technical Review.

[6]  Hong-Yuan Mark Liao,et al.  YOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detection , 2020, ArXiv.

[7]  Susanne Boll,et al.  Social Acceptability in HCI: A Survey of Methods, Measures, and Design Strategies , 2020, CHI.

[8]  Kyungjun Lee,et al.  Pedestrian Detection with Wearable Cameras for the Blind: A Two-way Perspective , 2020, CHI.

[9]  Apu Kapadia,et al.  "I am uncomfortable sharing what I can't see": Privacy Concerns of the Visually Impaired with Camera Based Assistive Applications , 2020, USENIX Security Symposium.

[10]  João Guerreiro,et al.  CaBot: Designing and Evaluating an Autonomous Navigation Robot for Blind People , 2019, ASSETS.

[11]  Virpi Oksman,et al.  A Social Robot in a Shopping Mall: Studies on Acceptance and Stakeholder Expectations , 2019, Human–Computer Interaction Series.

[12]  Tuuli Turja,et al.  Social Acceptance of Robots in Different Occupational Fields: A Systematic Literature Review , 2018, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[13]  Gerhard Weber,et al.  HapticRein: Design and Development of an Interactive Haptic Rein for a Guidance Robot , 2018, ICCHP.

[14]  Laura Giarré,et al.  Deep Trail-Following Robotic Guide Dog in Pedestrian Environments for People who are Blind and Visually Impaired - Learning from Virtual and Real Worlds , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[15]  Annuska Zolyomi,et al.  Technology-Mediated Sight: A Case Study of Early Adopters of a Low Vision Assistive Technology , 2017, ASSETS.

[16]  Gillian R. Hayes,et al.  (In)Visibility in Disability and Assistive Technology , 2017, ACM Trans. Access. Comput..

[17]  Jürgen Pripfl,et al.  A Long-Term Autonomous Robot at a Care Hospital: A Mixed Methods Study on Social Acceptance and Experiences of Staff and Older Adults , 2017, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[18]  Halley Profita,et al.  The AT Effect: How Disability Affects the Perceived Social Acceptability of Head-Mounted Display Use , 2016, CHI.

[19]  Maya Cakmak,et al.  Enabling building service robots to guide blind people a participatory design approach , 2016, 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[20]  Aleksandrs Slivkins,et al.  Incentivizing high quality crowdwork , 2015, SECO.

[21]  Serge Egelman,et al.  Information Disclosure Concerns in The Age of Wearable Computing , 2016 .

[22]  Gurvinder S. Virk,et al.  ISO 13482 - The new safety standard for personal care robots , 2014, ISR 2014.

[23]  Michael Decker,et al.  Service robots in the mirror of reflective research , 2012, Poiesis Prax..

[24]  Marion Hersh,et al.  A robotic guide for blind people. Part 1. A multi-national survey of the attitudes, requirements and preferences of potential end-users , 2010 .

[25]  Marcia J. Scherer,et al.  Living in the state of stuck : how assistive technology impacts the lives of people with disabilities , 2005 .

[26]  John Nicholson,et al.  A Robotic Wayfinding System for the Visually Impaired , 2004, AAAI.

[27]  M. Scherer,et al.  Assistive Technology Use and Stigma , 2004 .

[28]  Minoru Abe,et al.  Electrocutaneous Communication in a Guide Dog Robot (MELDOG) , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  John J. Clarke,et al.  ROAD TRAFFIC ACT , 1930 .