Combined uptake of [18F]FDG and [18F]FMISO correlates with radiation therapy outcome in head-and-neck cancer patients.

PURPOSE FDG PET is frequently used for radiotherapy (RT) planning to determine the tumour extent. Similarly, FMISO is used to assess the hypoxic sub-volume. The relationship between the volumes determined on the basis of FDG and FMISO was investigated. Additionally, the quantitative correlation of the tracers on a voxel basis was studied. METHODS Twelve head-and-neck cancer (HNC) patients underwent FDG and FMISO PET examinations prior to RT treatment. The tumour volumes assessed by the two tracers and also the voxel-based joint uptake values were investigated. The characteristic shapes and patterns of the determined scatter plots were analyzed. A number of different variables such as the maximum uptake values of FDG and FMISO, the FDG and FMISO positive volumes, the slope m of the regression line and the scatter width sigma of the scatter plots were tested for their ability to stratify the patient group with respect to treatment outcome. RESULTS A diversity of characteristic FDG-FMISO distributions was observed in the patient group. However, no general correlation of enhanced glucose metabolism and FMISO uptake was observed. The maximum uptake of FMISO (p=0.045) showed borderline significance for stratifying the patient group. FDG positive tumour volume, hypoxic fraction, maximum FDG uptake and m were not significant. Sigma turned out to be the most significant variable (p=0.008) to predict treatment success probabilities. CONCLUSION FMISO and FDG PET data provide independent information about the examined tumour. A quantification of the correlated tracer uptake seems to be meaningful.

[1]  Lester J. Peters,et al.  Utility of FMISO PET in advanced head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiation incorporating a hypoxia-targeting chemotherapy agent , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[2]  Matthias Reimold,et al.  Prognostic impact of hypoxia imaging with 18F-misonidazole PET in non-small cell lung cancer and head and neck cancer before radiotherapy. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  F. O’Sullivan,et al.  Hypoxia and Glucose Metabolism in Malignant Tumors , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[4]  D. Hedley,et al.  Tumor hypoxia has independent predictor impact only in patients with node-negative cervix cancer. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  H. Fukuda,et al.  Comparison of the distribution of fluorine-18 fluoromisonidazole, deoxyglucose and methionine in tumour tissue , 1999, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Alignment by Maximization of Mutual Information , 1997, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[7]  Paul Cumming,et al.  Effect of intratumoral heterogeneity in oxygenation status on FMISO PET, autoradiography, and electrode Po2 measurements in murine tumors. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  T K Lewellen,et al.  Quantifying regional hypoxia in human tumors with positron emission tomography of [18F]fluoromisonidazole: a pretherapy study of 37 patients. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  Daniela Thorwarth,et al.  Kinetic analysis of dynamic 18F-fluoromisonidazole PET correlates with radiation treatment outcome in head-and-neck cancer , 2005, BMC Cancer.

[10]  Anne Bol,et al.  Evaluation of a multimodality image (CT, MRI and PET) coregistration procedure on phantom and head and neck cancer patients: accuracy, reproducibility and consistency. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[11]  C Clifton Ling,et al.  Dependence of FDG uptake on tumor microenvironment. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Glucose metabolism of breast cancer assessed by 18F-FDG PET: histologic and immunohistochemical tissue analysis. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  S. Larson,et al.  Prognostic value of [18F]FDG-PET imaging in small cell lung cancer , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[14]  J. Eary,et al.  [18F]FMISO and [18F]FDG PET imaging in soft tissue sarcomas: correlation of hypoxia, metabolism and VEGF expression , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.