Reduction of Monte-Carlo simulation runs for uncertainty estimation in hydrological modelling

Abstract. Monte-Carlo (MC) simulation based techniques are often applied for the estimation of uncertainties in hydrological models due to uncertain parameters. One such technique is the Generalised Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation technique (GLUE). A major disadvantage of MC is the large number of runs required to establish a reliable estimate of model uncertainties. To reduce the number of runs required, a hybrid genetic algorithm and artificial neural network, known as GAANN, is applied. In this method, GA is used to identify the area of importance and ANN is used to obtain an initial estimate of the model performance by mapping the response surface. Parameter sets which give non-behavioural model runs are discarded before running the hydrological model, effectively reducing the number of actual model runs performed. The proposed method is applied to the case of a simple two-parameter model where the exact parameters are known as well as to a widely used catchment model where the parameters are to be estimated. The results of both applications indicated that the proposed method is more efficient and effective, thereby requiring fewer model simulations than GLUE. The proposed method increased the feasibility of applying uncertainty analysis to computationally intensive simulation models. Keywords: parameters, calibration, GLUE, Monte-Carlo simulation, Genetic Algorithms, Artificial Neural Networks, hydrological modelling, Singapore

[1]  B. Bates,et al.  A Bayesian Approach to parameter estimation and pooling in nonlinear flood event models , 1999 .

[2]  R. Hecht-Nielsen,et al.  Theory of the Back Propagation Neural Network , 1989 .

[3]  Luceno Distributed Data.  RELIABILITY ESTIMATION FROM , 2003 .

[4]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Automatic calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models: The question of parameter observability and uniqueness , 1983 .

[5]  Elizabeth M. Shaw,et al.  Hydrology in Practice , 1983 .

[6]  Keith Beven,et al.  Changing ideas in hydrology — The case of physically-based models , 1989 .

[7]  F. Recknagel,et al.  Artificial neural network approach for modelling and prediction of algal blooms , 1997 .

[8]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  A Shuffled Complex Evolution Metropolis algorithm for optimization and uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model parameters , 2002 .

[9]  Richard J. Heggen,et al.  Neural Networks for River Flow Prediction , 1995 .

[10]  Keith Beven,et al.  Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modelling , 1993 .

[11]  G. Kuczera.  Efficient subspace probabilistic parameter optimization for catchment models , 1997 .

[12]  Keith Beven,et al.  Uncertainty and equifinality in calibrating distributed roughness coefficients in a flood propagation model with limited data , 1998 .

[13]  R. E. Dickinson,et al.  Storm-Water Management Model, Version 4. Part a: user's manual , 1988 .

[14]  K. Bevenb,et al.  Use of spatially distributed water table observations to constrain uncertainty in a rainfall – runoff model , 1998 .

[15]  R Govindaraju,et al.  ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS IN HYDROLOGY: II, HYDROLOGIC APPLICATIONS , 2000 .

[16]  Q. J. Wang.  The Genetic Algorithm and Its Application to Calibrating Conceptual Rainfall-Runoff Models , 1991 .

[17]  S. Liong,et al.  Peak-flow forecasting with genetic algorithm and SWMM , 1995 .

[18]  Enoch M. Dlamini,et al.  Effects of model complexity and structure, data quality, and objective functions on hydrologic modeling , 1997 .

[19]  Alfred Ultsch,et al.  Self-organizing feature maps predicting sea levels , 2002, Inf. Sci..

[20]  George Kuczera,et al.  Monte Carlo assessment of parameter uncertainty in conceptual catchment models: the Metropolis algorithm , 1998 .

[21]  Weng Tat Chan,et al.  Derivation of Pareto front with genetic algorithm and neural network , 2001 .

[22]  K. M. O'Connor,et al.  Analysis of the response surface of the objective function by the optimum parameter curve: how good can the optimum parameter values be? , 2000 .

[23]  M. Perk.  Effect of model structure on the accuracy and uncertainty of results from water quality models , 1997 .

[24]  S. Uhlenbrook,et al.  Prediction uncertainty of conceptual rainfall-runoff models caused by problems in identifying model parameters and structure , 1999 .

[25]  L. Belanchea,et al.  Prediction of the bulking phenomenon in wastewater treatment plants , 2000 .

[26]  A. Jakeman,et al.  How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall‐runoff model? , 1993 .

[27]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[28]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators , 1989, Neural Networks.

[29]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .